Someone (with clue) from GoDaddy, please pick up the red courtesy phone?

2023-08-31 Thread Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
Hey there. I hate that I only use NANOG for this, but it seems right now that my day job can't add an additional nameserver to our NS-set. There's no email support or ticket system, and I've been told several untrue things about how the DNS and SRS work in text-based chat, and I Need An

Could people with experience with ARIN's IRR API contact me off-list?

2022-04-26 Thread Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
All, Dayjob uses RADB mainly but would like for authority purposes to put some things in ARIN. I've had an ARIN help desk ticket in for a couple days, and would like to move to letting our IPAM files be the source of truth and push everything in via the API, but I'm finding a few things about

Something observed while doing IRR cleanup (generic name collisions)

2022-04-11 Thread Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
All, The dayjob has a LOT of ASes (we peer with a unique AS per-site), so our IRR entries are kind of a lot. When "email templates" was the only way to do things, this was really annoying to update and maintain. I will say that having RPKI roas for the correct ASes for all of our entries

Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email

2022-04-05 Thread Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: Of course there's an argument that say "mom and pop should not run their own mailserver, there are professionals for that!" but at the end of the day what this really serves is deliberate and pre-mediated centralisation, slowly but steadily

Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT -

2022-04-05 Thread Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022, Owen DeLong wrote: On Apr 4, 2022, at 17:40 , John Curran wrote: On 4 Apr 2022, at 7:42 PM, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: Ironically, to find the way forward, ARIN would require incorporation, the signing of a RSA, and Moar Money for this same

Re: [nanog] Re: [nanog] 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT -

2022-04-04 Thread Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022, John Curran wrote: On 4 Apr 2022, at 9:52 PM, Jon Lewis wrote: ... I guess this legacy IP space, which is probably visible in ARIN's whois DB, but for which they provide no additional services unless you sign a LRSA and are then on the hook for annual membership fees?

Re: [nanog] Re: [nanog] Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT -

2022-04-04 Thread Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022, Jon Lewis wrote: On Mon, 4 Apr 2022, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: As one datapoint, two tiny /24's I (not-dayjob) originate are legacy resources. They cannot be added to either RPKI or the ARIN IRR objects without endeavoring to spend an at-least-this-much-money-price

Re: [nanog] Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40

2022-04-04 Thread Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote: I think all of us recognize a need to declaw "third party" IRR databases like RADB and ALTDB ("declawing" meaning that it is not desirable that anyone can just register *anything*); on the other hand our community also has to be cognizant about

Re: [nanog] opendkim (was: Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email)

2022-04-04 Thread Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022, Bjørn Mork wrote: "John Levine" writes: It appears that Michael Thomas said: On 4/3/22 12:12 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote: On a slightly related subject... This DKIM failure surprised me, but at least I verified that many NANOG subscribers have mailservers returning DMARC

Re: [nanog] Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email

2022-04-02 Thread Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
On Sat, 2 Apr 2022, Michael Thomas wrote: On 4/2/22 6:21 PM, John Levine wrote: It appears that Michael Thomas said: I'll be eager to see the papers substantiating this. Until then I remain completely skeptical. It's an experimental RFC for a reason. Let's see the data. ARC is not

Re: [nanog] Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email

2022-04-02 Thread Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
On Sun, 3 Apr 2022, Jeroen Massar wrote: Hi Dan, Hope the rest of the world is treating you decently! There are a lot of bits and bobs that one has to get right for mail to flow, amongst which: - IP -> PTR lookup -> that hostname lookup, and match to IP again

Re: [nanog] Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email

2022-04-02 Thread Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
On Sun, 3 Apr 2022, Niels Bakker wrote: I also run my own mail server. I had to firewall off Google's MXes for this exact reason: silent and not-so-silent email rejection when offered over IPv6. Every now and then they rotate their IP addresses, which causes mail to get dropped for a while.

Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email

2022-04-02 Thread Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
I've been seeing a long thread about why ipv6 adoption isn't there yet. This is half a "paging someone with clue" post and half a "...really, guys?" Picard-facepalm post. I just (earlier this week) had to disable ipv6 outbound on one of $dayjob's MX servers, because Gmail, who hosts

Could an Equinix Senior Management person please reach out to me ASAP

2020-10-06 Thread Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
Sorry to invoke the NANOG pager this way, but: This pertains to F-Root operations at my day job with isc.org, in both the US and Europe markets. Feel free to use dmahoney at isc.org instead of this, my personal email. Best (and stay safe), -Dan Mahoney -- Dan Mahoney

ISC DLV Registry now running a signed empty zone

2017-09-30 Thread Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
All, Just to let people know via this list: As of DNS-OARC 27 (where the change was done live) ISC's DLV Registry has now been replaced with a signed empty zone (SOA/NS/A/TXT/DNSKEY/RRSIG), which will be auto-re-signed with the same keys for the forseeable future. The IP address for the old