Just a bystander here, but what leads you to believe the packets aren't
going thru a router in Pittsburgh?
-- Dan
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024, 5:21 PM Neel Chauhan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got Fios installed today in my NYC apartment, as I just moved back
> from Seattle after a 4-month stay in Connecticut.
Someone at Intuit please look into why your DNS for this A record
hasn't been consistently resolving, this has been going on for several
days if not weeks
https://dnschecker.org/#A/smartlinks.intuit.com
-- Dan
One of the best things about this list is first hand accounts of our
internet lore
Does anyone have any stories about working with or near John they would
like to share with the list? It would definitely make my day to hear more
about the early internet
Thanks,
Dan
On Sun, Oct 16, 2022, 8:01 PM
I changed my hulu passwd and got this email from hulu (see below).
It notes what IP I used to change the passwd, but it's an internal IP!
Probably not as intended :)
email:
You've Changed Your Password
Hi Daniel,
As requested, your password has been changed. From now on, you'll use
this new pa
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 6:55 PM Josh Luthman
wrote:
> OK so an email address that isn't supposed to be used but works or a phone
> call that should be used and is pointless for the purposes of this issue?
>
Are you just asking to confirm this is disney’s position? 😂😂 it appears
so!
As an outsid
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 3:09 PM Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Not sure about that. To avoid cheaters, multiplayer games are likely to
> be mediated by a server running the same game engine to manage state of
> each player.
Probably veering off topic for the list here, but yes -- the advantage
to playin
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:50 PM Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Based on packet captures and customer experiences, that doesn't seem to be
> the case.
Aye, you're right I'm sure. Thank you for the correction.
Where P2P does NOT come into play is:
1. on xbox
2. standard multiplayer
3. CoD games since at l
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:47 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
> Games want to go peer-to-peer.
That was true up until about 2012.
As Martijn Schmidt noted, Activison contracts out to multiple managed
hosting companies to provide servers across the globe. If you launch
any recent call of duty game and hit
Matt Hoppes raises an interesting question,
At the risk of this being off-topic, in the latest call of duty games I've
played, their UDP-NAT-breaking algorithm seems to work rather well and
should function fine even behind CGNAT. Ironically turning on upnp makes
this *worse*, because when their al
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 7:17 AM Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Sorry, but I have some problems understanding this. AFAICT, you can't
> read anything about configuring IPv6 access without seeing DHCPv6-PD
> mentioned.
The point isn't that I couldn't read about DHCP PD; the point is that
I didn't know that I n
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:00 AM Fred Baker wrote:
> I'm sorry you have chosen to ignore documents like RFC 3315, which is where
> DHCP PD was first described (in 2003). It's not like anyone's hiding it.
I am sorry as well!
I openly admit I am not the smartest bear in the woods. I struggle to
rea
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 7:51 PM Mark Andrews wrote:
> > I have nothing against using
> > v6 -- , I must admit the truth is I have no idea how to make ubuntu
> > acquire a v6 -- address? block ? I don't even know the right term --
> > from uverse.
>
> It should just be a DHCPv6 PREFIX DELEGATION (P
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 4:29 PM Daniel Sterling
wrote:
> Also: I think ipv6 isn't working for me cuz it's being dropped by a switch
> I'm using!
>
> I will swap that out / remove that and try ipv6 again
OK, ipv6 is working for me now.
The switch that was dropping i
No voice service on my line, or TV. Just gigabit internet.
Also: I think ipv6 isn't working for me cuz it's being dropped by a switch
I'm using!
I will swap that out / remove that and try ipv6 again
-- Dan
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020, 9:10 AM Hiers, David wrote:
> We find that they usually impose pr
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:57 PM Jared Mauch wrote:
> if the question is will the browser vendor (google) or the broadband provider
> (att)
> move first, i can already predict the answer. my experience (again) with the
> quic
> wg is they seem to think there's many options and bad providers will
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:11 PM Jared Mauch wrote:
> As a network operator my goal was always to ensure customers receive
> the traffic they expected, high rates of UDP were often not what they wanted.
Well, I wouldn't say I *want* UDP traffic, but if everyone is bound
and determined to s
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 8:27 PM Masataka Ohta
wrote:
> A problem of QUIC with NAT is that existing NAT can not detect
> graceful shutdown of QUIC and must depends on timeout.
>
> So, port numbers may be used up before timeout.
Hmm, this is not what is happening.
I managed to (fairly easily!) rep
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 11:47 PM Daniel Sterling
wrote:
> random-source-port UDP traffic does not impress the AT&T network flow
> control systems, and your DNS traffic becomes unbearably slow (or is
I received a comment that maybe the issue is not AT&T's "core"
netwo
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 3:34 PM Blake Hudson wrote:
> Yeah, that was a nice surprise to find that my tethered LTE connection
> was out performing my wired cable modem service. Of course, I had
> already signed up for a year of service and there were early termination
> fees for cancelling... that
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 2:55 PM Blake Hudson wrote:
> I'm guessing ATT doesn't disclose this policy transparently either.
they disclose it pretty transparently to their customers in the form
of very slow youtube traffic when using v4 QUIC ;)
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:51 AM Damian Menscher wrote:
> [snip impressive debugging story]
lol fair. I didn't umm mean to just brag -- my point was that:
generally available SoHo internet is worse than mobile networks esp.
for UDP traffic!
> Rather than hobble your home network to work around a
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 8:05 PM Michael Brown wrote:
> Blocking a (for you) undesirable option when an established fallback
> exists is a much better end user experience than introducing breakage
> into that option
> Or: I no longer use my ISP's IPv6 access (via 6rd) since it would cause
> terrib
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 7:20 PM Dan Wing wrote:
> For all we know, you and the others noticing the issue have fallen into the
> pit of A/B testers checking for their current throttling, and others aren't
> being throttled.
Ouch, I hope not -- do A/B tests that result in extreme performance
degr
9On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 7:07 PM Ross Tajvar wrote:
>
> Are you suggesting that ATT block all QUIC across their network?
One might argue they already *are* doing so; QUIC is essentially
unusable on my AT&T ipv4 residential connection (and a web search
suggests I'm not alone).
I've AT&T fiber (in RTP, NC) (AS7018) and I notice UDP QUIC traffic
from google (esp. youtube) becomes very slow after a time.
This especially occurs with ipv4 connections. I'm not the only one to
notice; a web search for e.g. "Extremely Poor Youtube TV Performance"
notes the issue.
I assume traf
Turn on all the google tracking bugs on the phone and get a GPS fix outside.
http://android.stackexchange.com/questions/4715/how-may-i-submit-a-wifi-hotspot-to-androids-database-for-a-better-triangulation/4716#4716
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
> On 10/30/15 3:31 PM, Lauren
or years.
> On Sep 20, 2014 7:54 PM, "Daniel Sterling"
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Bacon Zombie
>> wrote:
>>
>> > So when was the last time you patched this internet facing device?
>>
>> Isn't the better respons
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Bacon Zombie wrote:
> So when was the last time you patched this internet facing device?
Isn't the better response, thank you for decommissioning it?
Can someone from cisco set up a poll or release whatever numbers they
have about how many of these old devices a
28 matches
Mail list logo
