I can't say what everyone else does, but we only make exact matches from route
object to prefix-list
http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie
> On 30 Jan 2014, at 21:48, "Martin T" wrote:
>
> Job, Tore: ok, I see. So "route" object in RIR routing registry database
> for each announced prefix is needed on
We are using Juniper MX and Brocade XMRs for our P and PE routers.
Thanks
Darren
http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:19:33 +0100
> From: kuenz...@init7.net
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: What routers do folks use these days?
>
> Am 29.11.2013 06:37, schrieb Jawaid
It's back with this: "Ben quite succinctly sums it up on a nanog mailing list,
“Your (the service provider) user is paying you to push packets. If that’s
causing you a problem, you either need to review your commercial structure
(i.e. charge people more) or your technical network design. Face th
It was released
Thanks
Darren
http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie
> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:58:24 -0700
> From: fergdawgs...@mykolab.com
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: iOS 7 update traffic
>
>
> Can someone please explain to a non-Apple person what the hell happened
> that started generatin
In this class you are matching:
class-map match-any SSH
match ip dscp cs2
Why not just match an ACL for SSH traffic from the local router back to your
management range?
> From: khomyakov.and...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:07:19 -0400
> Subject: management traffic QoS on Tunnel interf
All vendors should be writing in depth architecture books. The Juniper MX book
is a great example. Tell us exactly what your product can do and we'll likely
use more of it
> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:01:58 -0400
> Subject: Re: IOS architecture
> From: da...@davidswafford.com
> To: khomyakov.and
I purposely assigned myself a .0 and never had a problem using anything online,
or going anywhere
> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 22:00:53 +0200
> From: tore.ander...@redpill-linpro.com
> To: j...@instituut.net
> Subject: Re: Issues encountered with assigning .0 and .255 as usable
> addresses?
> CC: na
people do start using it and then you have the same overlapping problem again
> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:18:56 -0400
> From: m...@latt.net
> To: darre...@outlook.com
> CC: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: 169.254.0.0/16
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 06:59:09PM +0100, Darren O'
I've just set up a vpn tunnel to Amazon's AWS and as part of the config they
required me to configure to /30 tunnels using addressing from the
169.254.0.0/16 space.
RFC3927 basically says that this address should only be used as a temp measure
until the interface has a proper private or public
9 matches
Mail list logo
