Is there a good contact at Gmail that can take care of a persistant issue
for me?
Thanks in advance,
Dave Rand
d...@kelkea.com or d...@bungi.com
--
If someone from AT&T or SBC global could contact me off list, please?
2.96.0.0/13 is pretty much unreachable from portions of the Bay Area from
the sbcglobal network. I've opened a couple of tickets on this, but no
joy yet.
Thank you
--
[In the message entitled "Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers" on
Jun 9, 0:26, Steven Bellovin writes:]
>
> A liability scheme, with penalties on users and vendors, is certainly =
> worth considering. Such a scheme would also have side-effects -- think =
> of the effect on open so
[In the message entitled "Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers" on
Jun 8, 13:33, Owen DeLong writes:]
>
> I realize your fond of punishing all of us to subsidize the ignorant, =
> but I would rather see those with compromised machines pay the bill for =
> letting their machines get c
[In the message entitled "Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers" on
Jun 8, 14:30, Brielle Bruns writes:]
>
> Legit customers get caught in the cross-fire, and they suffer - but at
> the same time, those legit customers are the only ones that will be able
> to force a change on said
[In the message entitled "Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers" on
Jun 8, 16:03, "J. Oquendo" writes:]
>
> All humor aside, I'm curious to know what can anyone truly do at the end
> of the day if say a botnet was used to instigate a situation. Surely
> someone would have to say somet
[In the message entitled "Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation" on Sep 8,
14:34, Joe Greco writes:]
> > there is a fundamental disconnect here. the IP space is neutral.
> > it has no bias toward or against social behaviours. its a tool.
> > the actual/real target here are the people who ar
7 matches
Mail list logo
