(such as devices that have a large
number of active sessions with hosts that its routers redirect; web
servers, smtp systems...).
[1] Li, Q., Jinmei, T., Shima, K., IPv6 Core Protocols
Implementation, October 2006.
ISBN 13: 978-0-12-447751-3
ISBN 10: 0-12-447751-8
--
David W. HankinsBIND
enumerations in the set.
--
David W. HankinsBIND 10 needs more DHCP voices.
Software Engineer There just aren't enough in our heads.
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. http://bind10.isc.org/
pgpufEv5bMuqI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 01:02:49PM -0700, David W. Hankins wrote:
will ultimately be cleaned. If the destination is reused later,
Ah, I forgot to complete this thought in editing.
If packets are sent to the destination later (after a cache entry is
expired) the host obviously starts over
as it does with v4.
This is surprising to me, can you comment on why DHCPv6 TA is being
used in this scenario?
--
David W. HankinsBIND 10 needs more DHCP voices.
Software Engineer There just aren't enough in our heads.
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. http://bind10
-mirror may be further away than they
appear.
--
David W. HankinsBIND 10 needs more DHCP voices.
Software Engineer There just aren't enough in our heads.
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. http://bind10.isc.org/
pgp66NKQSsEEU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
differently.
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineeryou'll just have to do it again.
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
pgp5lDTPDChD6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
exchanges, we miss the forest for the
trees.
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineeryou'll just have to do it again.
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
pgpNQAGCnPio4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to continue working on LL's (or, ironically, routing protocols
or DHCPv6 itself), but anywhere else (mail.example.com,
contacts.example.com), anywhere real, and the network goes dark.
Unless of course it can fall back on native IPv4, or has entered a
bogus covering /64.
--
David W. HankinsIf you
accept that a secured DHCPv6 session must rely,
in order to function to expectations, upon the unsecurable RA and/or
questionably secure SEND?
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineeryou'll just have to do it again.
Internet Systems
Fascism.
Anything less, despite the nobilities espoused by their protractors,
and you will bleed hidden costs.
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineeryou'll just have to do it again.
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc
were on the
plans when I got there. I gather the planners believed they would
facillitate use of the ark by hybrid human-acquatic lifeforms that did
not exist at the time, nor do they exist today, but were hoped to
exist because mermaids and mermen are, like, totally hot.
--
David W. Hankins
only gave a /60?
Then someone gets a STATUS_NoAddrsAvail.
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineeryou'll just have to do it again.
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
pgp0jVWYbs56T.pgp
Description: PGP
://cbs5.com/local/phone.internet.outage.2.980578.html
Rather widespread general telco outage, the county has deployed
extra patrol units in the south bay to compensate for not being able
to call 911.
Third video link in shows repairs underway.
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right
the good guys
bust in the door and shut down the CC domain/hosting, they can just
open up shop somewhere else like nothing happened.
Not entirely unlike terrorist cells.
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineeryou'll just have
of its own vague handwaving choices.
It is Marxism (turned Socialism) vs Fascism at its root.
I hope I have not spent my year's worth of NANOG tolerance for DHCP
related discussions with the above. :)
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer
. My analysis of your further arguments is
that you have selected a proper subset of actual Internet operational
needs in order to further justify these same conclusions.
I will leave it at that. :)
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer
if its default
router has failed (and thus will not have to wait for rebinding).
This has further config implications as the server(s) are no
longer able to detect the difference in a client's renewal or
rebinding, but it can be an effective optimization.
--
David W. Hankins
with (more complicated) client-based algorithms, and
you've got the picture.
But yeah, in that the static-RARP-BOOTP-DHCP progression was a
dialogue between operators and IETF, IPv6 has basically thrown that
dialogue out with the bathwater, and we're having it all over again.
Fun!
--
David W. Hankins
supersets of network management needs. RA is a vast subset. Herein
lies the rub; you have to implement both anyway because a client can
not predict what network(s) it is going to be used in.
Nobody wins.
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer
support for DHCPv6 in jubliant encouragements of
DHCPv6 operational experiments and deployment.
[...] Joe is not entirely wrong.
Hooray! :-)
I am seriously considering admitting I know you. :)
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer
and shrinks, you can greatly reduce your own footprint
in these attacks with a quick upgrade.
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineeryou'll just have to do it again.
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
given, and desired to
do it well.
That's really what you should be looking for, locality is irrelevant.
--
Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
Why settle for the lesser evil? https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time
-ishi krimpatul.
Why settle for the lesser evil? https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineeryou'll just have to do it again.
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
to iron out is: Who gets to be (golden) parachute
lemmings?
--
Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
Why settle for the lesser evil? https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineeryou'll just
thingies are
useful.
IPv6: It's kind of like storing dry food in preparation for the
apocalypse.
--
Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
Why settle for the lesser evil? https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time
then
the simple devices won't bother to support it.
Or if they do, they'll do it wrong. They can't even get ifDescr
right.
--
Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
Why settle for the lesser evil? https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right
this is not going to change). This is in addition to
today, where such clients consume multiple IPv4 addresses. Insult
to injury.
--
Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
Why settle for the lesser evil? https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
--
David W. HankinsIf you
supports Dynamic DNS). But you still
wont' have any DHCPv6 clients outside of Vista.
This is where the chicken meets the egg on our faces.
--
Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
Why settle for the lesser evil? https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
--
David W. HankinsIf you
bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
Why settle for the lesser evil? https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineeryou'll just have to do it again.
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
Why settle for the lesser evil? https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineeryou'll just have to do it again.
Internet
halve the
root and by extension the GTLDs' relevance. I do not believe they
will permit this to come to pass. Provided they did, we would win
anyway, as signing zones itself would have become the norm.
--
David W. HankinsIf you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer
throwing spaghetti at the wall), but if
you'd rather base your decisions on what you like (or not), you have
every right to do so.
In my opinion there are a bulk of technical merits that place DHCPv6
ahead of RTadv. I don't like either protocol, but they're what we've
got.
--
David W. Hankins
32 matches
Mail list logo
