> https://www.networksolutions.com/blog/2013/06/important-update-for-network-solutions-customers-experiencing-website-issues/
Why are they infinitely looping a script on their web server to check
for a cookie?
Are these people insane?
On 08/06/2013, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2013-06-07 06:50, Dan White wrote:
> [..]
>
> A nice 'it is Friday' kind of thought
Caring about secrecy (or obscurity) of algorithms is a fools errand.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerckhoffs%27s_principle
Taking Shannon's maxim "the enemy knows the
I've been trying to find details to the contrary but as far as I see,
there's no indication that the constitutional (or otherwise) rights of
any US citizens (or anyone, anywhere, for that matter) are being
overtly (or otherwise) trampled which would seem to be the pertinent
objection.
The somewhat
On 03/05/2013, John D Caffery wrote:
> The UNO AS number is 23666 ...
26333 right?
>From Wikipedia:
Ultimately, #OpIsrael caused virtually no damage and was assessed by
the Israeli Government's National Cyber Bureau and by numerous
security experts and journalists to have been a failure.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpIsrael
In history, people get taken unawares, by their neighbours.
We don't implement systems to protect against that - no matter how
much betrayal stares us in the face. The price of peace is eternal
diligence and no-one writes that cheque.
>From Troy to Chamberlain - it's not an issue of finding new reg
Comments inline ... as best I can.
On 30/11/2012, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
>
> David Walker writes:
>
>> [ patent fight recap ]
>
> Thanks for posting those. I recall the discussions surrounding the
> HSRP patents well, but it's been a while and I have proport
On 30/11/2012, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> [*] The OpenBSD side of the story can be read at
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Address_Redundancy_Protocol#No_official_Internet_protocol_number
>
> Seems that there is a lesson to be learned here:
>
> "o hai, we wrote this software but can not be
http://www.ted.com/talks/kevin_slavin_how_algorithms_shape_our_world.html
One of my favourite nerd talks.
Although largely about trading algorithms it covers trading networks ...
Best wishes.
On 08/06/2012, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> It also allows them to sign anyone they want as someone pretending to be
> you, but with a different key pair.
You're exacly correct but in this case I don't think CAs are necessary
and probably detrimental so it's moot.
Currently I don't care at all if so
On 07/06/2012, Lynda wrote:
> Sorry to be the bearer of such bad tidings.
I'm a very amateur cryptologist so some of this is new to me:
"Any organization using SHA-1 without salting user passwords is
running a great risk -- much higher than they should," said Per
Thorsheim, chief information secu
On 08/03/2012, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
> Hi Radke
>
> You can try http://bgp.he.net
Example:
http://bgp.he.net/AS4739
Guest login here:
http://peeringdb.com/
>
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Radke, Justin wrote:
>
>> How can I easily view the current peering relationship of a particular AS?
>
Teach the TCP/IP model ...
On 16/02/2012, John Kristoff wrote:
> Hi friends,
>
> As some of you may know, I occasionally teach networking to college
> students and I frequently encounter misconceptions about some aspect
> of networking that can take a fair amount of effort to correct.
>
> For ins
I'm an end user but I refer to these from time to time:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3013.txt
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3871.txt
I suppose the salient question is what kind of customers are we talking about.
Best wishes.
Hey.
On 14/11/2011, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> In other words, your use of RFC1918 address space alone does not
> create security.
I had this crazy idea that somewhere in the rfcs was a "should" that
manufacturers block private address space (i.e. hard coded) but it's
not (in fact the opposite).
Obviou
On 14/11/2011, Jason Lewis wrote:
> I don't want to start a flame war,
If you didn't write it I wouldn't stress about that.
> but this article seems flawed to
> me.
Me too.
> It seems an IP is an IP.
Yes but in IPv4 land there is a difference although probably not in
the way the author "sugg
16 matches
Mail list logo
