On Dec 24, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
I'm more persistent than smart, and I tell ya, if you prep well
enough, you can hand your checklist to a stoned intern and you'll
have no worries at all.
this works in a tech culture where folk follow mops obsessively. my
experience is that
On Dec 24, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
I _do_ create action plans and _do_ quarterback each step and _do_
slap down any attempt to deviate.
imagine a network engineering culture where the concept of 'attempt to
deviate' just does not occur.
randy
=]
The networking group is
I second the TACACS+
Thats what you want. Same effort for the most part, to implement.
Eddy
On Nov 7, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Steven King wrote:
I disagree with the RADIUS suggestion. TACACS+ is a much more secure
protocol. It encrypts the packet contents and has a more secure
handshake procedure.
On Jun 6, 2008, at 11:33 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Chris Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and to pile on...
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/www.amazon.com
down as of - 2008-06-06 14:33:38 - now.
Anyone see the humor in the Google ads...
Buy
On Mar 25, 2008, at 1:42 PM, Robert Boyle wrote:
At 12:36 PM 3/25/2008, Greg VILLAIN wrote:
I'd strongly suggest Foundry, I'm a big fan of their kits, price-wise
and performance-wise, provided you do not need rocket-science
features.
MLX/XMR models will surely do the trick perfectly.
I
5 matches
Mail list logo
