Hi folks, just musing...
From an ops perspective, wonder just how much traffic caused:
"This morning, our engineers sounded the alarms ... and we have
installed a digital version of a traffic cop. We enacted stopgaps that
we planned for last night. We had hoped we didn't have to."
--Jeff V
Hi folks,
So I'm a network engineer and a law student and have decided to write
a short note for one of our International Law classes based on UDRP
and ICANN issues.
I'd like to request input from the community as to what they see as
the advantages and disadvantages for the UDRP process t
Off list is fine...this is precisely why I chose to write about it.
On Oct 22, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
Fire, meet gasoline. >;-) If allowed to ignite, this will be an
explosive discussion.
scott
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ernie Rubi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I agree - Although this isn't legal advice and I'm not a lawyer:
It amends 18 U.S.C. §2703 which is entitled "Required Disclosure of
Customer Communications or Records" which refers to providers, not
home users...
Better question:
1) Is there a reasonable expectation of privacy in the commu
ha, funny you should say that; do a quick search for "plain language
of the statute" and let me know how many dissenting views in court
opinions you find.
Big fallacy to say that even though it's 'plain English' it means
*one* thing...
This is a big tangled web of statutory and common law
Anyone else having trouble? We're colo'ed at the NOTA in Miami and directly
peer with them - even though our session hasn't gone down we still can't reach
them.
Ernesto M. Rubi
Sr. Network Engineer
AMPATH/CIARA
Florida International Univ, Miami
Reply-to: erne...@cs.fiu.edu
Cell: 786-282-6783
I don't think ARIN (or any other RIR) wants people to think this way.
Appreciation and value are words that most folks at ICANN don't want network
engineers to associate with IP addresses.
"The real value is in routing"; is the party line.
STLS to me is kind of double speak, ARIN says: "thi
Um, down for everyone reports it as down for everyone.
Any news as to what may be causing it?
Ernesto M. Rubi
Sr. Network Engineer
AMPATH/CIARA
Florida International Univ, Miami
Reply-to: erne...@cs.fiu.edu
Cell: 786-282-6783
Don't take this the wrong way but vote with your feet if you don't like it.
Taken to its logical conclusion this is the "no one person or corporate entity
is 'neutral'" rationale/argument - so what? For-profit business organizations
(both VZ and TMRK are publicly traded for-profit with sharehol
OK so the argument is the 'community' is ARIN's source of legal power or is the
corporate laws of the State of Virginia?
On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:57 AM, John Curran wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:51 AM, Benson Schliesser wrote:
>>> Such transfers should be reported when noticed, so the resources c
12:58 PM, John Curran wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Ernie Rubi wrote:
>
>> OK so the argument is the 'community' is ARIN's source of legal authority or
>> is it the corporate laws of the State of Virginia?
>
> Mr. Rubi -
>
> ARIN operates the A
That's the question, and it seemed that the answer started to be formulated in
terms of 'community acquiescence/policy leads to authority' in a previous
email, so I wanted to make sure that was in fact the response to the question,
at least in part.
ARIN will likely argue that 'this was done al
Step #2.
Retain legal counsel or talk to general counsel.
On Mar 4, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Adcock, Matt [HISNA] wrote:
>
> Don't deploy the equipment, demand a refund, and report the reseller to
> Cisco. I agree completely with Brian - find a good Cisco partner and stick
> with them. Also, you
Illegal control = Conversion = at least a tort, but could also be a crime.
On Apr 29, 2010, at 10:05 PM, William Pitcock wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 21:48 -0400, David Krider wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 16:47 -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
>>> Surely even at DeVry they teach that if you ref
Hi all,
Anyone from AS29748 with peering auth, can you contact me off list?
Thanks,
Ernesto M. Rubi
Sr. Network Engineer
AMPATH/CIARA
Florida International Univ, Miami
Reply-to: erne...@cs.fiu.edu
Um, I think that's what ARIN means when they say changing the registrant on a
block from Entity A to Entity B means. That's effectively 'reclaiming'.
As I understand it, I think they also contend that the 'community' could say to
ARIN 'take back X legacy block' and that ARIN would have no cho
I don't think that's ARIN's position (someone correct me if I'm wrong),
especially if you mean to say they having the same 'rights' as RIRs to
transfer/assign/lease/delegate/port those IP numbers. Using the numbers you
have is another thing entirely.
On Feb 3, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wr
Way off topic here...and into the legal arena:
As to the monopoly classification, do you think, at least with ARIN (since it
is a US/Virginia corporation) that Sherman Act §2 (i.e. antitrust) principles
could be applied to require that it relinquish some of the control over said IP
space/databa
Good question:
Depends on what kind of address space assignment - if you mean legacy IP space,
then no there is no case law.
Kremen v. ARIN (Northern District of CA) is the only case law out there, but it
is on point only as to 'current' IP space. In Kremen, the district court went
only as
Anyone else see anything / know of any odd behavior on the prefix yesterday
afternoon/today?
Here in Miami (NAP) we saw some issues through one of our upstreams and ended
up disabling the BGP session, then re-enabling it with a filter to block said
prefix.
We've since removed the filter and t
Agreed,
Look at:
http://ciara.fiu.edu/publications/Rubi%20-%20Property%20Rights%20in%20IP%20Numbers.pdf
Even assuming Kremen was decided as ARIN says; United States District Courts
can and do disagree.
On Mar 24, 2011, at 2:24 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> Yes, Kremen lost, but not based on an
Alright, how about this - let's wait and see what the bankruptcy judge says.
Which firm do you practice for?
On Mar 24, 2011, at 3:05 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Ernie Rubi wrote:
>>
>> http://ciara.fiu.edu/publications/Rubi%20-%20Propert
rom my iPhone
On Mar 24, 2011, at 9:24 PM, John Curran wrote:
> On Mar 24, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Benson Schliesser wrote:
>
>> At your suggestion, I went to the IGP blog and read the last comment. I see
>> there is a response by Ernie Rubi to your blog comment, which captures my
gt; On Mar 24, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Benson Schliesser wrote:
>>> At your suggestion, I went to the IGP blog and read the last comment. I
>>> see there is a response by Ernie Rubi to your blog comment, which captures
>>> my question so well that (with apologies to Mr Rubi)
24 matches
Mail list logo