You could look into Noviflow!
F.
Sent from my mobile device. Apologies for any typo.
On Dec 27, 2013, at 8:05, Baldur Norddahl baldur.nordd...@gmail.com wrote:
On the topic of building a software router for an ISP, has anyone tried it
using OpenFlow? The idea is to have a Linux server run
Folks,
I am looking at rolling out IPv6 in the access.
My platform does DHCP Option 82 for geolocating customer MACs to certain ports
of multi-port layer 2 demarcation devices.
What is the IPv6 version of that ?
F.
How about RouterOS from Mikrotik ?
You cannot beat a $70 RB750G for doing P2P hijacking.
F.
On 2011-04-29, at 8:59 AM, Kornelijus Survila wrote:
Snort (http://www.snort.org/) is also a nice IDS. They provide paid and free
rules/signatures.
-k
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Raymond
Folks,
The Canadian telecommunications regulator, the CRTC, has just launched a public
notice with possible worldwide implications IMHO, Telecom Notice of
Consultation CRTC 2011-206:
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2011/2011-206.htm
I think this is the very first regulatory inquiry into IP
In an effort of figuring out a metro ethernet access network to carry Internet
access services,
I'm comparing the approaches of several equipment manufacturers insofar as how,
they allow a metro service provider to provide point-to-multipoint E-TREE
public services,
(where the leaves of the
Looks like a third edition is on the way slated for March 2011
http://www.amazon.com/MPLS-Enabled-Applications-Developments-Technologies-Communications/dp/0470665459/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpt_2
I would expect it to cover MPLS-TP and the struggling evolution of PBB-TE ...
anybody has any idea if this is
Is there anyone out there who has a position on whether it is worth the effort
to map Multi-root EVPL (E-TREE) atop VPLS or to await for PBB-TE and MEF to
come up with somekind of a common roadmap ?
F.
On 2010-12-03, at 10:26 AM, Manu Chao wrote:
I have only GRT and L3VPN traffic and would
leave much other choice but VPLS does it not ?
F.
On 2010-11-13, at 5:38 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:30:19 -0500
Francois Menard franc...@menards.ca wrote:
I'm embarking on a new project which involves a large scale MAN network
where ultimately, the objective is to carry QinQ
On 2010-11-12, at 4:24 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:41:00PM -0800, Leo Bicknell wrote:
I've run into a number of low end CPE situations lately where I
haven't found anything that does what I want, but I have to believe
it is out there. I'm hoping NANOG can help.
I'm embarking on a new project which involves a large scale MAN network where
ultimately, the objective is to carry QinQ, while at the same time delivering
services over IPv6.
The objective is to support jumbo frames on all interfaces, at least to carry
QinQ standard-size ethernet frames, but
We just bought a fair amount of MRV Optiswitches for that same purpose.
F.
On 2010-10-20, at 11:29 AM, Curtis Maurand wrote:
I'd add Alcatel to that list.
On 10/20/2010 11:24 AM, Eric Merkel wrote:
I've been tasked with making a recommendation for the core and access
equipment for a small
Folks,
Question #1:
Is it possible for me to put an MPLS router on both ends of a circuit leased
from a transport service provider which does not support QinQ (i.e. packets of
1526 bytes), and which requires us to tag traffic onto a well specified set of
VLANs (i.e. if we want two VLANs, the
Oops two typos - sunday evening casualties.
On 2010-09-12, at 10:06 PM, Francois Menard wrote:
Folks,
Question #1:
Is it possible for me to put an MPLS router on both ends of a circuit leased
from a transport service provider which does not support QinQ (i.e. packets
of 1526 bytes
We use Fiberworks from Enghouse. Its built atop ArcObjects and all data is
stored in an ARCGIS geodatabase, providing good flexibility to get the data
brought up on ArcGIS Server (Web) for web-based editing.
The good thing about this system is that it can also be used for design of FTTH
as
I have an opportunity to launch services in a remote marke, where I
cannot extend my backbone to.
However, this market is big enough that I can afford to put a Cisco
7201 over there and peer in BGP-4.
Do you have any advice as to what may happen if I advertise different
blocks from the
The Coalition of Internet Service Providers has filed a substantial
contribution at the CRTC stating:
1) The CRTC should forbid DPI, as it cannot be proven to be 98.5%
effective at trapping P2P, such as to guarantee congestion relief
2) The CRTC should allow for other forms of traffic
également inclus une interprétation
française
aussi bien ?
Sincèrement,
Lorell Hathcock
-Original Message-
From: Francois Menard [mailto:franc...@menards.ca]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 3:51 PM
To: nanog list
Subject: DPI or Flow Management
The Coalition of Internet Service Providers
-Original Message-
From: Francois Menard [mailto:franc...@menards.ca]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 3:51 PM
To: nanog list
Subject: DPI or Flow Management
The Coalition of Internet Service Providers has filed a substantial
contribution at the CRTC stating:
1) The CRTC should forbid DPI
Its like the post office getting envolopes by the truckload, then
opening each envelope, read the content, to decide when to send the
opened letter for delivery, either by foot or car, claiming that such
a decision process will prevent envelopes from flooding the post
office, coming into the post
The issue is use of dpi to eliminate congestion stemming from p2p's
natural unfairness behind the unbundling interface.
F.
Le 09-03-01 à 21:14, Jack Bates jba...@brightok.net a écrit :
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
In short, the entire DPI debate is starting to go on similar lines,
and
The short story behind this deployment is that Charle's infrastructure
is at the tail end of a submarine cable on an island, where there is
only 1 competitor, but the ILEC, on the island side of the submarine
cable.
The ILEC owns the submarine cable
But the ILEC will not do BGP
The
The rule with ARIN is that you only need to demonstrate that you WANT
do do multihoming, not that you WILL do multihoming.
That question would be better asked on the ARIN policy mailing list.
I'm also on that list.
That was cleared with ARIN as part of the process to get that /22
I guess
or you buy some boxes from BTI Photonics that specialize into taking
GigE around the world...
F.
--
François D. Ménard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11-Oct-08, at 12:25 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Friday 10 October 2008 14:50:11 Fletcher Kittredge wrote:
We are looking to light a two strand fiber
23 matches
Mail list logo
