Hey!
New message, please read <http://homeeshop.co.in/say.php?f9>
Greg Ihnen
It sounds like the Navy and who ever else they partner with (NIST?) need
some egress filtering on their NTP servers to catch and prevent events like
this.
Are these UPS units going inside the racks? Would it not be better to do
something in the power room with an inverter on the circuits that feed the
racks, such as a large Outback unit with sufficient battery capacity?
http://www.amazon.com/OutBack-Inverter-3600-Watts-Volt/dp/B002MWAAYU
With one
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Izaac iz...@setec.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:50:12AM -0700, Henry Stryker wrote:
Not only that, but a majority of spam I receive lately has a valid DKIM
signature. They are adaptive, like cockroaches.
This is why tcp port 25 filtering is totally
From other geographic locations I can connect to the dropbox service and get to
their https web page, but from my home connection I can't, unless I vpn around
the issue.
downforeveryoneorjustme says it's just me, but they're located someplace else
geographically, and I don't know if they check
A trick to do on mail (USPS) spammers is take the prepaid mailing envelope they
often include and tape it to a brick wrapped in brown paper and drop it off at
the post office. They have to pay the shipping. If enough people do it, they go
out of business.
In this case, do anything you can to
mitigation technique?
Is anyone else seeing this?
Greg Ihnen
mitigation technique?
Is anyone else seeing this?
Greg Ihnen
mitigation technique?
Is anyone else seeing this?
Greg Ihnen
On Mar 30, 2012, at 6:01 PM, Dylan Bouterse wrote:
A couple of thoughts. First, it's not fair to compare 24GHz to 2.4 or even
5Gig range due to the wave length. You will get 2.4GHz bleed through walls,
windows, etc. VERY close to a 5GHz transmitter you may get some bleed through
walls but
Respectfully, the claim isn't a decline in the cost of backhaul bandwidth
between 10 and 100 times, the claim is Operators will be able to get 10 to
100 times more data throughput for the same dollar. which granted is a very
good thing, but it does not imply how much more money one would have
with GPS sync.
Greg
On Jan 15, 2012, at 7:12 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:
Another one which looks promising for high-density locations is Xirrus
(www.xirrus.com)
Haven't ever used them though.
-mike
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 15, 2012, at 15:36, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Since
Since we're already top-posting…
I've heard a lot of talk on the WISPA (wireless ISP) forum that 802.11g/n
starts to fall apart with more than 30 clients associated if they're all
reasonably active. I believe this is a limitation of 802.11g/n's media access
control (MAC) mechanism, regardless
On Jan 3, 2012, at 4:14 AM, Måns Nilsson wrote:
Subject: RE: AD and enforced password policies Date: Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at
11:15:08PM + Quoting Blake T. Pfankuch (bl...@pfankuch.me):
However I would say 365 day expiration is a little long, 3 months is about
the average in a non
Install Ghostery on your browsers and you'll see even more connections pages
want to make behind the scenes to tracking sites etc. It's not just javascript.
Greg
On Sep 29, 2011, at 8:57 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:43:49 +0530, Glen Kent said:
Any idea why these
On Aug 16, 2011, at 3:03 AM, Leigh Porter wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Irvine [mailto:sparcta...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 August 2011 17:42
To: Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: How long is your rack?
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:49 PM,
On Aug 13, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
I live on a farm and I have a number of data runs between buildings that are
copper ethernet pulled through buried conduits. (It was what I could afford
when I put it in). We have trouble from time to time with damage from
lightning. (I've
On Aug 13, 2011, at 11:28 AM, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 13, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
I live on a farm and I have a number of data runs between buildings that are
copper ethernet pulled through buried
On Aug 11, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 5:41 AM, Jamie Bowden wrote:
Owen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:58 PM
To: William Herrin
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 end
On Aug 11, 2011, at 5:05 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I respectfully disagree. If appliance manufacturers jump on the bandwagon to
make their device *Internet Ready!* we'll see appliance makers who have way
less networking experience than Linksys/Cisco getting into the fray. I
highly doubt
On Jun 10, 2011, at 10:06 AM, Ricardo Ferreira wrote:
I live in europe and we have at home 100Mbps . Mid sized city of 500k
people. Some ISPs even spread WiFi across town so that subscribers can have
internet access outside their homes.
Cablevision does that somewhat.
Greg
On May 30, 2011, at 8:56 PM, Bob Snyder wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
I just got off the phone with a level 1 tech support guy about an issue with
my parents Cablevision/Optimum Online service and decided to ask the fellow
if there's any
I just got off the phone with a level 1 tech support guy about an issue with my
parents Cablevision/Optimum Online service and decided to ask the fellow if
there's any official company news about IPv6 being in the works. His comments
were that there is a test coming up (he was referring to
On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:19 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Mar 7, 2011, at 14:27, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
I run a small network on a mission base in the Amazon jungle which is fed by
a satellite internet connection. We had an outage from Feb 25th to the 28th
where we had
I run a small network on a mission base in the Amazon jungle which is fed by a
satellite internet connection. We had an outage from Feb 25th to the 28th where
we had no connectivity with email, http/s, ftp, Skype would indicate it's
connected but even chatting failed, basically everything
I run a small network in the jungle of Venezuela which is fed by a rebranded
Hughesnet connection. We just had a four day failure where the only protocol
that worked was ICMP and we were completely without communication. Traceroutes
all failed in a bizarre way when using UDP, TCP or GRE packets
+1 on Nick's comment. If you're doing 1:1 NAT or port forwarding your server is
still public facing.
If your firewall is merely stateful and not deep packet inspecting all it's
doing is seeing is that the statefulness of the connection meets it's
requirements. You could have that and still
27 matches
Mail list logo
