Re: IPv6 and CDN's

And ipv4 I presume so there is still easier and cost less money to just go with that. From our point as an MSP no customer has a requirement that they want to be able to be reached via IPV6 so it’s still cheaper to buy up IPV4 address space and do a lot of nat than to convert all our services t

SV: IGP protocol

Hello all. We also run a small network (sub 50 PEs) It looks pretty similar to Baldurs except we run IS-IS instead of OSPF. IPV4 only in the global table with VPNV4 and VPNv6 services running on top of it. We do run a separate OBM network to handle management without being dependent on service i

SV: Proving Gig Speed

We use Netrounds for this. We make a speedtest site available to the customer for their "click and test" needs which is the first step. If the customer doesn’t achive their allocated speed we will send out a probe (usually some form of Intel NUC or similar machine) that can do more advanced te

SV: Cisco NCS5501 as a P Router

Hello. We are running 5001 also and we have the same issue with it programming the wrong entry into the hardware. Interesting to hear that the issue is still in 6.1.2 since we were thinking about upgrading to that one to see if it fixes the issue but I think we will give it a pass. Seems the B

SV: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers

Herrin [mailto:b...@herrin.us] Skickat: den 3 maj 2016 22:32 Till: Gustav Ulander Kopia: Eric Sabotta ; NANOG list Ämne: Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Gustav Ulander wrote: > Yes I can confirm that we also had the issue with the asr1001s. >

SV: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers

Hello all. Yes I can confirm that we also had the issue with the asr1001s. For us the router was fine until we upgraded it. When we rebooted it after the upgrade it ran out of memory when populating 2 full feeds. When we contacted TAC they confirmed that indeed it was a memory problem and that

RE: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers

Hello. When we was in a similar situation we opted for one transit provider to provide a default to us then we filtered on AS-HOPS so prefixes that was more than 3 hops away was denied. This way we got the ones that where closest to us and that where more likely to matter. Prefixes that’s more

RE: internet visualization

Agreed. Everyone at the office have been flying some. :) //Gustav -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+gustav.ulander=telecomputing...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Chris Knipe Sent: den 8 september 2015 16:50 To: nanog list Subject: Re: internet visualization Indeed! One of