Please send the job spec..
On Fri, 4/24/15, Harry Hoffman wrote:
Subject: OT: Long term contract work in Boston/Cambridge area
To: "NANOG"
Date: Friday, April 24, 2015, 1:55 PM
Good morning,
First, I beg your pardon if job
walter, i couldn't care less about your problem! get the message!
From: Walter Keen
To: James Wininger
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: Fiber only in DataCenters?
Many of the colocation datacenters or carrier hotel da
On Jun 15, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Isabel Dias wrote:
> are you any good in Maths?
> http://www.stanford.edu/~milgrom/publishedarticles/Advances%20in%20Routing%20Technologies%20and%20Internet%20Peering%20Agr.%202001.pdf
If you're good in maths, you'll realize that the simple peering
ng Agreement
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA256
>
>
>On Jun 15, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Isabel Dias wrote:
>> are you any good in Maths?
>>
>>http://www.stanford.edu/~milgrom/publishedarticles/Advances%20in%20Routin
>>g%20Technologies%20and%20Interne
are you any good in Maths?
http://www.stanford.edu/~milgrom/publishedarticles/Advances%20in%20Routing%20Technologies%20and%20Internet%20Peering%20Agr.%202001.pdf
maybe a PhD will find a point in using this part of their self-development
how far can you go and what is your position in th
http://long.ccaba.upc.es/long/070Related_Activities/020Documents/IPv6_An_Internet_Revolution.pdf
worth going through certification
From: Seth Mos
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2012 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: ipv6 book recommendations
You are an excellent point of contact at China Telecoms. In fact you could try
the resident team in resourcing for huawei at your local university campus
they always turn up in exhibitions
From: Olivier CALVANO
To: "NANOG list (nanog@nanog.
are you a PhD? otherwise you are not making sence
From: Jay Ashworth
To: NANOG
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2012 3:17 PM
Subject: PLEASE don't feed the troll
Nuff said?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@bayl
1- what do you mean by "Licensed folks working in architecture and design"?
2- You wrote "IT isn't governed by the same hard (physical) rules as
traditional engineering, but you also can't be freely creative and
expect to come up with something that works." bolox!
As far as I'm aware you are not
Hi Tim, How long have you been on that position? IT Security Manager
are you self-employed or running your own limited company?
what areas of knowledge are you mostly interested in? where about are you
based? what do you think the role of an IT Security Manager is about?
From: David Sw
ask your account manager if he has any agreement in place with any supplier
From: Matt Ryanczak
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, October 3, 2011 2:22 PM
Subject: Ashburn Va. Datacenter Movers
Can anyone recommend a vendor in the D.C. metro region with experien
i guess you have a lot of ibgp sessions ..:-)
bgp finite state model
http://www.inetdaemon.com/tutorials/internet/ip/routing/bgp/operation/finite_state_model.shtml
http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:C5Rq3DV63akJ:citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.71.3908%26rep
IPv4? IPv6?
are you planning to do NAT or PAT?
Are you using a bogous ASN 64512 through 65534 to be used for private purposes?
/30 -> 4 addresses/2 hosts -> you can't do a mesh configuration w/ that subnet
mask..
--- On Wed, 6/15/11, James Grace wrote:
> From: James Grace
> Subj
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/junose61/swconfig-routing-vol2/html/bgp-mpls-vpns-config15.html
http://fengnet.com/book/Definitive%20MPLS%20Network%20Designs/ch01lev1sec6.html
http://www.armware.dk/RFC/rfc/rfc4798.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/crs/software/crs_r4.
have you thought about taking a Cisco training course?
- Original Message
From: Daniel STICKNEY
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu, April 7, 2011 10:27:01 AM
Subject: Implementations/suggestions for Multihoming IPv6 for DSL sites
Hello all,
I'm investigating how to setup multihoming for IP
how many ip addresses do you have ?
- Original Message
From: Daniel STICKNEY
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu, April 7, 2011 10:27:01 AM
Subject: Implementations/suggestions for Multihoming IPv6 for DSL sites
Hello all,
I'm investigating how to setup multihoming for IPv6 over two DSL lin
why would you do that for?
- Original Message
From: Daniel STICKNEY
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu, April 7, 2011 10:27:01 AM
Subject: Implementations/suggestions for Multihoming IPv6 for DSL sites
Hello all,
I'm investigating how to setup multihoming for IPv6 over two DSL lines
(diffe
If you can't be good be carefull!
A "relation" is just a relationship between sets of information
What is a relation? A Relation is a group of Functions
- Original Message ----
From: isabel dias
To: litera...@gnaa.eu; full-disclos...@lists.grok.org.uk; nanog@nanog.
The only reason why you feel that way is cause you haven't been made aware and
your network of friends is not "helping you at all" so do speak up and make
yourself heard!
- Original Message
From: Leon Kaiser
To: full-disclos...@lists.grok.org.uk; nanog@nanog.org;
irc-secur...@lists
how relevant is that information?
- Original Message
From: Eric Gauthier
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Fri, February 25, 2011 1:52:44 PM
Subject: Re: A pragmatic issue with running out of v4 :)
I wonder if Skynet upgraded to v6...
Eric :)
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:03:03AM +, bmann
do you have a satellite dish? what are your dish pointing coordinates..we
just need to find out what is going on the air interface ...
From: Ryan Wilkins
To: Jay Ashworth
Cc: NANOG
Sent: Fri, February 4, 2011 4:46:47 AM
Subject: Re: Weekend Gedankenexper
sure
From: Lee Howard
To: Owen DeLong ; david raistrick
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sun, February 6, 2011 2:16:35 PM
Subject: RE: quietly
> The end-to-end model is about "If my packet is permitted by policy and
delivered to the
> remote hos
around the world
and also in the UK ..:-)
From: isabel dias
To: Kevin Hodle ; Steve Danelli
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
Sent: Tue, February 1, 2011 4:16:42 PM
Subject: Re: Connectivity to Brazil
I still don't know where you are and the simulatio
I still don't know where you are and the simulation you are doing .can you
be more specific ?
From: Kevin Hodle
To: Steve Danelli
Cc: isabel dias ; "nanog@nanog.org"
Sent: Tue, February 1, 2011 2:27:41 PM
Subject: Re: Connectivity to Braz
who are you?
From: Steve Danelli
To: "nanog@nanog.org"
Sent: Tue, February 1, 2011 1:54:47 PM
Subject: Connectivity to Brazil
Hello all!!! First post here
Some carrier, somewhere between us and the service provider is selectively
dropping the IKE packets
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps295/products_configuration_example09186a0080093e3b.shtml
http://s-tools1.juniper.net/solutions/literature/white_papers/200187.pdf
3rd party vendors might want to have me onboard :-) otherwise you can come up
w/
your own piece of kit, rfc' it an
location?
- Original Message
From: Matt Disuko
To: NANOG
Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 3:02:59 PM
Subject: Global Crossing/GBLX tech needed - AS3549
Can a Global Crossing IP engineer please contact me off-list?
Thanks,
Matt
check the agreed maintenance windows as defined in the (SLA)section Maintenance
Plans - etc
- Original Message
From: Joel Jaeggli
To: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Fri, December 10, 2010 6:48:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Operational] Internet Police
On 12/10/10 9:06
http://hen.cs.ucl.ac.uk/library/hardware/routers/procket/20fcs/routing_protocols/bgp.verify19.html
http://www.inetdaemon.com/tutorials/internet/ip/routing/bgp/operation/finite_state_model.shtml
http://www.cymru.com/Documents/barry2.pdf
I would check the latest version of the RFC and also the
Is cable better for gamming?
- Original Message
From: isabel dias
To: Chris Boyd ; NANOG
Sent: Tue, May 4, 2010 2:41:48 PM
Subject: Re: Emulating ADSL bandwidth shaping
same as in the HFC and QAM modulation values and so on and so forth .
services that are requiring a
same as in the HFC and QAM modulation values and so on and so forth .
services that are requiring a connection-oriented service such as a gaming
clan/cloud are highly affected when working in latency and jitter network based
environments such as the ethernet based ones and SMDS ...
--
CEO position -> Did you know:
> The majority of S&P 500 CEOs are in their 50s
> 29% of S&P 500 CEOs have an advanced degree other than an MBA
> CEOs in the S&P 401-500 group are more likely to have a shorter tenure with
> his or her company than other S&P 500 CEOs
> 60% of S&P 500 CEOs have b
Godzilla vs. the Smog Monster
- Original Message
From: Dave Hart
To: Tim Franklin
Cc: NANOG
Sent: Fri, April 23, 2010 12:57:47 PM
Subject: Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:38 UTC, Tim Franklin wrote:
> Assuming your ISP is providing your DNS. What i
1- http://onlyv6.com is not resolving .
2- why would anyone be interested in buying "bit-pipes" from you if you don't
own fiber or ports in a switch?
3- why would anyone be interested in buying ip address space if they can do it
from SP's themselfs or apply for that ripe allocation?
4- ICIN 2
"IPv6 routing table 7-10 times smaller than the IPv4 routing table"
http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2009-May/014240.html
:-)
a bit of old stuff to get to the bottom line
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-49/presentations/ripe49-plenary-bgp.pdf
- Original Messa
Big Brother is watching you! so last year!
True, but the lawfull intercept has been around for a while, active/passive
flow tap monitoring, port mirroring , called ID spoofing ...i also saw an
update on the IOS/Junos roadmpap not that long ago. the 7600 has been around
for a while now and s
I Just Don't Know What To Do With Myself
- Original Message
From: Jeroen Massar
To: Mark Andrews
Cc: nanog@nanog.org; Richard E. Brown
Sent: Fri, February 5, 2010 1:16:53 AM
Subject: Re: Regular Expression for IPv6 addresses
Mark Andrews wrote:
[..]
> And now for the trick question.
who's side are you on?
Just before answering think about the opportunities and threats before consider
having sex! You just need to know how to protect yourself. Not to everyone’s
taste but pregnancy can be prevented after intercourse by taking emergency
contraceptive pills (EC). Other chose pa
:-)
- Original Message
From: joel jaeggli
To: Ron Bonica
Cc: nanog
Sent: Wed, November 4, 2009 3:41:26 AM
Subject: Re: ip options
How about unused and/or private/local diffserve code points?
Ron Bonica wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I would love to see the IETF OPSEC WG publish a document o
Just depends of the policy based billing /billing models in place. If "billing"
is seen as a service the common denominator is the charge the port otherwise a
variety of other elements.
- Original Message
From: Malte von dem Hagen
To: isabel dias
Cc: Mike Lyon ; K
peering in the IX's a.k.a peering -> unless is a payed service
=private-peering! at the exchange
- Original Message
From: Mike Lyon
To: Ken Gilmour
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
Sent: Sun, November 1, 2009 4:38:44 AM
Subject: Re: Peering in Latin America
You may want to double check your v
There is always a peering policy in place and I am sure you have a few
requirements in mind and you will be evaluating costs carefully as well as
options thoroughly before making a decision on which SP to go for. I am sure
technical teams are flexifle to accomodate some bespoke private peering
How many times more anyone will be lookin to ask the same questions. IX's
(peering) are there and most likely companies have presence either on the NY IX
or LINX so ask them around and peer w/ them locally. Transite is a costy
solution unless you want to load balance your traffic and have means
on Irish Sea
> Sent: 29 Mar 2009 16:04
>
> We received the report from Packet Exchange, however they are not the
> owners of the cable. I assume they just rent spectrum.
>
> 2009/3/29 isabel dias :
>>
>> affecting whom? and who's network?
>>
>>
>&g
t; We received the report from Packet Exchange, however they
> are not the
> owners of the cable. I assume they just rent spectrum.
>
> 2009/3/29 isabel dias :
> >
> > affecting whom? and who's network?
> >
> >
> > --- On Sun, 3/29/09, Ken Gilmour
>
affecting whom? and who's network?
--- On Sun, 3/29/09, Ken Gilmour wrote:
> From: Ken Gilmour
> Subject: Fiber cut on Irish Sea
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Date: Sunday, March 29, 2009, 4:55 PM
> Hi There,
>
> Since we use a vendor of "the vendor" of two
> Irish sea submarine
> cables I am wond
Dave,
Your netblock might be a standard /19 or just a modest /30 :-) or you are just
deploying IPv6 and therefore applied for one of the most recent RIPE
assigments.
Do you have different AS private/public numbers running on your network?
filtering IGP routes part pf the OSPF design would
> b) You want to educate others
> c) You want to participate in flame wars
> d) You want to read flame wars
> e) You want to denigrate those seeking to educate
> themselves or others
>
> You cant have your cake and eat it too.
>
> Thanks but no thanks, I am going to a
Joe,
I take credit card payments and we can agree on a daily rate ...as after
all you are into "IT Consultancy".
Just use the available search engine optimizers to build your knowledge based
by performing the "black had v white hat" searches :-)
I am here still what is your budget?
Maybe the best way of addressing this is knowing exactly what we need to
measure- if IP traffic, services or processes. If the timescale of a process
(ie: MTTR's)and/or procedure or just data and/or voice traffic from point A to
B. Or just scoping the measurments as being the performance of the
321-663-0421 Cell
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: isabel dias [mailto:isabeldi...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 12:15 PM
> To: Robert D. Scott
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: XKL
>
>
> What do you mean?
>
> --- On Wed, 2/1
ork Engineer 352-273-0113 Phone
> CNS - Network Services 352-392-2061 CNS
> Receptionist
> University of Florida 352-392-9440 FAX
> Florida Lambda Rail 352-294-3571 FLR NOC
> Gainesville, FL 32611 321-663-0421 Cell
>
>
>
what do you mean?
--- On Wed, 2/11/09, Sutterfield, Brian wrote:
> From: Sutterfield, Brian
> Subject: XKL
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 5:33 PM
> Does anyone have any experience using the DXM from XKL for
> DWDM
> deployments?
>
>
>
> Any feedback is appreci
we wonder why they have not come up w/ a better word on that IT website, a
"standard" ...maybe launching day ...or opening day .:-)
--- On Sat, 1/24/09, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> From: Hank Nussbacher
> Subject: Re: inauguration streams review
> To: "Florian Weimer"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Someone is basicly "twicking the mail headers" by sending messages like "[EMAIL
PROTECTED]"-who is?
OUI...yes, great topic! Now mind me asking but why would you need a "private"
OUI if the well-known (registed) list is quite public and everyone has a
reserved allocation? (vendors have)
and yes
Raymondo .
I guess you are bringing everyone together on the achieving resilience and
"efficient" Load Balancing just in case the one path is temporarly unavailable
.. :-)
*commit/rollback
CISCO IOS
save a configuration to the NVRAM with the copy running-config startup -config
Patel,
I would suggest you to read a few things about the path selection
algoritmas if i understand your words you are asking for an issue on LSA
type 4 rather than multiple AS and therefore LSA type 5 /7-ASBR
prefer backbone intra-area paths over inter-area paths
Excerpted from RFC 1
question - "beginning a small deployment of IPv6 now
even if its just for internal usage"
Sure! there are plenty of reasons .most obvious one is to feel
confortable about ipv6
--- On Wed, 10/29/08, Steven King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Steven King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subj
"chance to pick up a redundant connection".
Well, traffic will have chances to pick up an alternative AS path - mesh
peering (at the public IX). Also go via the redundant physical link if you have
one agreed w/ ure peering point, or just take the best egress path via the (or
one of the )tran
everyone seems to have their saying from leting you wonder on what is the
problem to making assumptions to witty technical explanations and useless
question rephrased. For some reading this some are just non-technical
individuals posting messages. All can be done ..we all know the BGP selec
60 matches
Mail list logo