Robert Story wrote:
>
> USC/ISI is renumbering both its IPv4 and IPv6 addresses for
> b.root-servers.net on 2023-11-27. Our new IPv4 address will be
> 170.247.170.2 and our new IPv6 address will be 2801:1b8:10::b.
> USC/ISI will continue to support root service over our current IPv4 and
> IPv6
Mark Stevens wrote:
> Is anyone else getting the following error when trying to access any of
> google's services?
> SSL_ERROR_RX_RECORD_TOO_LONG
Isn't this usually a sign of a protocol mismatch?
I.e., TLS 1.3 vs TLS 1.2.
My money would be a MitM / middlebox / proxy that
messed up when your
Dave wrote:
> Folks for most systems, this is a change to a single file. Not a really hard
> thing to accomplish
Oh, hah, good one.
I twitch with mild PTSD thinking about the last time
there was change to DST in the US[1], and how
everybody quickly found out that e.g., Java,
databases,
William Herrin wrote:
> It turns out that every password I allowed Chrome on Android to
> remember, it uploaded to Google. In plain text!!
Chrome does not store your passwords in plain text.
It encrypts them locally, on e.g. macOS using, I
think, a secret stored in the keychain under "Chrome
Neil Hanlon wrote:
> I think you just need to let scripts run in your browser for nanog.org.
>
> It uses Javascript to add the emails in after the fact, it appears.
Yep. It's obfuscation via an XOR with a key included
in the href. So if you do not want to run javascript,
you can grab the
Owen DeLong wrote:
> DOH isn?t inherently bad, but every implementation
> of DOH that I am aware of involves depriving the
> user of choice and/or control
I don't think that's quite correct.
There is an unfortunate and persistent conflation of
"DoH" with "DoH to a centralized third-party
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> I think it would be a grand thing if someone put together a visible list of
> critical Internet infrastructure, who maintains it, and perhaps "click to
> support" buttons for those that need support.
Perhaps an opportunity to collaborate with
Hello,
I'm currently preparing a talk on "Ethical Obligations in Internet
Operations"[1] for Velocity NY in October. In preparation, I've put
together a short, anonymous survey for people involved in "Internet
Operations":
Hello,
Who here on this list has deployed IPSec or other comparable lower layer
encryption in a large scale environment, or attempted to do so?
I've repeatedly heard claims that doing so is not feasible (either
operationally or financially), but I have not seen any specific studies,
reports,
Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
One might look at MS's documentation about deploying end-to-end ipsec
in their enterprise for one example of peer-to-peer ubiquitous ipsec.
This is interesting and kind of what I'm looking for. Do you have a
pointer to this documentation?
My
Joly MacFie j...@punkcast.com wrote:
A comment on the WSJ
storyhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203833004577249434081658686.htmlcontains
a link to a great map.
http://www.submarinecablemap.com/
I always liked this one, too:
http://is.gd/DXcddb
(Yes, flash. Still.)
-Jan
David Radcliffe da...@davidradcliffe.org wrote:
I do have to say to anyone planning to work from home, make sure you have a
proper work space.
For whatever it's worth:
I have been working from home for the last 3.5 years. I live in
Manhattan in a one-bedroom with a 4 year and now a 2
Matt Hite li...@beatmixed.com wrote:
Might someone have the video for this presentation in their personal stash?
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog51/presentations/Monday/NANOG51.Talk45.nanog51-Schaumann.pdf
I don't have the video handy, but there really wasn't all that much more
info in the
Matt Hite li...@beatmixed.com wrote:
Hi, Jan. It's a great presentation and I really love your approach.
However, I am curious -- why was IP-in-IP not pursued? I know the
presentation mentioned the MTU issue, but your final solution seemed
full of enough pitfalls itself (ie -- lots of
Hello,
Some of you may remember my talk at Nanog51 about L3DSR
(http://nanog.org/meetings/nanog51/presentations/Monday/NANOG51.Talk45.nanog51-Schaumann.pdf).
I had promised that we'd try to get the server side bits released soon.
While it took longer than anticipated, I'm glad to be able to
Hi,
If there's somebody from RCN on this list who I can talk to about their
DNS (specifically about records that are too large for UDP and fall back
to TCP), please contact me.
Thanks,
-Jan
pgpwbzESDAjBY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
16 matches
Mail list logo
