On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Edward Dore
wrote:
> Take a look at Panopta - we use it to compliment our internal monitoring and
> find it great compared to some of the systems we've used in the past
> (Pingdom, Binary Canary).
>
> The interface is easy to use and responsive, we don't get fal
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> I have a couple of wiring projects coming up on salt water-going vessels and
> I'm curious as to people's experiences with different types of cable marking
> products in a high-humidity / salt air / bilge environment
>
> None of the marke
I pay for (x) bits/sec up/down. From/to any eyecandysource. If said
eyecandy origination can't handle the traffic, then I see a slowdown,
that's life. But if <$IP_PROVIDER> throttles it specifically, rather
than throttling me to (x),I consider that fraud.
I didn't pay for (x) bits/sec from some
>From 47CFR§8.5b
(b) A person engaged in the provision of mobile broadband Internet
access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block
consumers from accessing lawful Web sites, subject to reasonable
network management; nor shall such person block applications that
compete with t
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> I am not a lawyer (in fact, I Am Not An Isp), but my understanding is this is
> pretty well settled.
>
> And it is not even weird or esoteric. If the content on the site is against
> the law in the jurisdiction in question, it is not l
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> Again, well settled.
>
> It is where the end user is viewing the content _and_ where the content is
> served. If a CDN, then each node which serves the traffic must be in a place
> where it is legal. There are CDNs which do not serve a
I am sure The Gibson guitar company thought the same thing about the EPA.
At least we can be sure that a TLA govt agency wouldn't be used to
harass an administration's political opponents, right?
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> On Feb 27, 2015, at 16:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Tal Mizrahi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are looking for publicly available statistics of network latency
> measurements taken in large networks.
> For example, there is FCC's measurements
> (http://www.fcc.gov/measuring-broadband-america/2012/july).
> However, we are look
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
>
> As wonderful as the new communications paradigms are, do we also
> have a situation now developing where it might eventually become
> very difficult or even impossible to ensure out-of-band lines of
> communications remain available?
>
That's
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> i just lost ten minutes debugging what i thought was a server problem
> which turned out to be a dns trapper on the wireless in the changi sats
> lounge. this is not the first time i have been caught by this.
>
> what are other roaming folk doi
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> Peter Beckman wrote:
> Here's a pretty common line that Microsoft has that Google completely omits
> (or that I can't find):
>
> "We do not sell, rent, or lease our customer lists to third parties."
>
> ~Seth
>
>
You aren't Bing's customer
11 matches
Mail list logo
