Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters?

2018-07-09 Thread LHC
2002::/16 is still valid - not a bogon as long as there is an IPv4 Internet. Add the IPv4 bogons, though (2002:7f00:::/48 through 2002:7f.ff:ff.ff::/48, & others) On July 9, 2018 3:06:00 PM PDT, "Fabien VINCENT (NaNOG)" wrote: >Le 2018-07-09 18:10, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu a écrit : > >>

Re: US/Canada International border concerns for routing

2017-08-11 Thread LHC (k9m)
You mean ROBALLOFUS right? :-) On August 8, 2017 5:33:28 PM PDT, Clayton Zekelman wrote: > > >With the peering policies of the major Canadian ISPs, you're >virtually guaranteed to hairpin through the US on most paths. > >Robellus (Rogers, Bell & Telus) will peer with you at

Re: Contact at Orange?

2017-08-03 Thread LHC (k9m)
Wrong currency zone On August 3, 2017 12:19:07 AM PDT, Dan Hollis wrote: >On Thu, 3 Aug 2017, Benoit Panizzon wrote: >> Apparently this was not their problem. > >As long as the money's green? > >-Dan -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my

Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic

2017-05-23 Thread LHC (k9m)
You need an extra 9 lines to handle the overrun. On May 23, 2017 12:10:52 PM PDT, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: >On Tue, 23 May 2017 15:07:14 -0300, Pedro de Botelho Marcos said: > >> Dynamic agreements offer many opportunities. For example, consider >> acquiring extra "bandwidth as a service"

Re: AT NOC contact?

2017-05-23 Thread LHC (k9m)
you just won the internet. On May 22, 2017 4:59:59 PM PDT, Chris Hartley wrote: >Well, I have some thicker sand blast resist that has very poor >adhesion. I >could see trying that for, as you say, simple designs. More complex >designs could theoretically have tabs added

Re: Please run windows update now

2017-05-16 Thread LHC (k9m)
YOU WENT THERE (ignores enough to run for president) On May 15, 2017 1:48:51 AM PDT, Randy Bush wrote: >> Or BSD, or anything but Windows. Anyone running Microsoft products >> is quite clearly an unprofessional, unethical moron and fully >deserves >> all the pain they get --

Re: IRNOG1 Meeting

2017-05-16 Thread LHC (k9m)
... I'll show myself out. On May 16, 2017 10:35:29 AM PDT, "LHC (k9m)" <large.hadron.colli...@gmx.com> wrote: >Make it fun, with cake and for the apostates, bacon > >On May 13, 2017 3:15:51 AM PDT, Shahab Vahabzadeh ><sh.vahabza...@gmail.com> wrote: >>H

Re: IRNOG1 Meeting

2017-05-16 Thread LHC (k9m)
Make it fun, with cake and for the apostates, bacon On May 13, 2017 3:15:51 AM PDT, Shahab Vahabzadeh wrote: >Hello Hello, >Proudly I want to announce that 1st IRNOG Meeting will launch at 24th >of >May in Tehran. >In the first day of public announce we had near 90

Re: What services do you control at your org?

2017-04-30 Thread LHC (k9m)
I'm a teenager. For my personal systems, the answers are: I am the networking group, but my work is nonexistent. Myself. NEETery. I'm mostly concerned with maintaining the white noise generators. And since I am talking about my personal systems, yes. On April 27, 2017 3:56:19 PM PDT, Matt

Re: nanog: SixXS is shutting down

2017-03-23 Thread LHC (k9m)
Many people still don't have native IPv6. Why must 6XS die? On March 23, 2017 11:03:01 AM PDT, Pim van Pelt wrote: >Colleagues of nanog, > >In 1999, Jeroen and I started SixXS, a project which aimed to provide >IPv6 connectivity to users who wanted to learn about the network

Re: Dyn DDoS this AM?

2016-10-24 Thread LHC
All this TTL talk makes me think. Why not have two ttls - a 'must-recheck' (does not expire the record but forces a recheck; updates record if server replies & serial has incremented) and a 'must-delete' (cache will be stale at this point)? On October 23, 2016 3:42:58 PM PDT, Mark Andrews

Re: Dyn DDoS this AM?

2016-10-24 Thread LHC
All this TTL talk makes me think. Why not have two ttls - a 'must-recheck' (does not expire the record but forces a recheck; updates record if server replies & serial has incremented) and a 'must-delete' (cache will be stale at this point)? On October 23, 2016 3:42:58 PM PDT, Mark Andrews

Re: Lawsuits for falsyfying DNS responses ?

2016-09-13 Thread LHC
I believe that the CRTC has rules against censorship - meaning that Videotron, Bell etcetera have a choice between following the CRTC code or the provincial law (following one = sanctions from the other), rendering internet service provision to Québec impossible without being a dialup provider