Re: Smokeping targets

2016-01-08 Thread Marco d';Itri
On Jan 07, Andrew Dampf wrote: > Something I found that is helpful once you've gathered a list of targets is > the following command for generating config to paste: > > traceroute -w 3 [IPaddress] | grep -v "*" | grep -v "traceroute" | sed -e > 's/(//g' -e 's/)//g' | awk '{ gsub(/\./,"_",$2); pr

Re: Spamhaus BGP feed experiences?

2015-05-18 Thread Marco d';Itri
On May 17, Mike Lyon wrote: > Any ISPs out there (big or small) ever used the Spamhaus BGP feed to > prevent against botnet, spam, etc? If so, how has your experience been? Is > it worthwhile? Has it helped? On / off list responses are appreciated in > advance. We use Spamhaus DROP (not the BGP v

Re: v6 deagg

2015-02-23 Thread Marco d';Itri
On Feb 20, Saku Ytti wrote: > Is deaggregation inherently undesirable? In some RIR LIR will not get new No. Excessive deaggregation is undesirable, but we lack a method to teach routers to enforce this subtlety and maybe also a wide agreement on what is excessive. > allocation, just because LIR

Re: New Intercage upstream

2008-09-13 Thread Marco d';Itri
On Sep 13, "Jon O." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks like this might be somewhat bulletproof, check the other sites off this > "AS" > http://www.robtex.com/dns/pacificinternetexchange.net.html#a2 It may be, yes. Look at what else this AS is announcing: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?qu