Subdomain of a Microsoft domain name associated with a Microsoft
product? Microsoft would be the only 'registry'. Perhaps ask them?
It'd be a great thing, but i'm pretty sure it doesn't exist for public
consumption.
(would love to be proven wrong!)
On 8/03/2024 9:26 am, Nicholas Warren
ot; warrantless surveillance program. The list of
government abuse of civilian resources is colossal .
Fighting against that isn’t political. It’s patriotic.
-mel
On Apr 25, 2021, at 12:02 AM, Mark Foster wrote:
On 25/04/2021 3:24 am, Mel Beckman wrote:
This doesn’t sound good, no matte
On 25/04/2021 3:24 am, Mel Beckman wrote:
This doesn’t sound good, no matter how you slice it. The lack of
transparency with a civilian resource is troubling at a minimum. I’m
going to bogon this space as a defensive measure, until its real — and
detailed — purpose can be known. The secret
Apologies for the top-post to a bottom-thread; I blame Outlook.
I was going to comment that in a couple of corporate network engineering roles
I've had, the lack of the business case has always been to highlight that all
the things we want to reach on the Internet can be accessed by IPv4.
So
I respect this in principle, but hyperbole serves no-one - a smartphone only
creates a "morass of privacy/security issues" if you let it. A basic smartphone
can be had for less than $100 USD, which would give you calling, text messaging
and emergency alerts. You don't need to spend many
On 2021-01-03 08:26, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2021 18:59:37 +1300, Mark Foster said:
In my mind it's simple.� The streaming companies need to have a
channel
within their streaming system to get a message to a 'currently active
customer' (emergency popup notification that appears
On 3/01/2021 2:41 am, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Sean Donelan wrote:
the Commission shall complete an
inquiry to examine the feasibility of updating the Emergency
Alert System to enable or improve alerts to consumers provided
through the internet, including through streaming services.
It is
Official update from Mozilla:
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/
Mark.
On 5 May 2019 5:50:19 AM NZST, "Valdis Klētnieks"
wrote:
>On Sat, 04 May 2019 10:46:41 -0700, Randy Bush said:
>> >> to do it, i have to start ffox.��and 100 tabs will open and
On 25/04/2019 3:13 AM, Benjamin Sisco wrote:
I think we all understand the value of using one’s own equipment and keeping
the firmware up to date if one is in any way concerned about security. We all
should also understand that in a managed environment such as an ISP there
should be no
> at 5:40 PM, John Levine wrote:
>
>> In article you
>> write:
>>> Agreed, and I do get unsolicited Linkedin requests quite often.
>>> Sometimes, this is clearly the result of someone scraping a list like
>>> NANOG in an effort to drum up new business/contacts. Those end up in
>>> the
>>>
I got the same invite.
Sharing your profile in order to make certain information available to
potential customers, vendors, partners etc, is not an invitation to
connect on the basis of a tenuous-at-best professional tie-in.
I'm firmly in the camp of 'Use LinkedIn to remain connected with people
I'll simply endorse the 'stop judging an IP by it's RIR' approach. As a New
Zealander (and APNIC is our RIR), having to convince US institutions that our
subnets should not be blocked simply because they're out of the same /8 as
those used by other Asian nations with poorer IP address
The person who owns the internet connection still has responsibility for
what happens on it.
So if the owners are educated to select reputable brands in order to
prevent themselves from being implicated in a DDoS and liable for a fine
or some other punitive thing, they 'vote with their feet'
Hi Mel, There's another mailing list called 'mailop' which is probably
more appropriate for email related problems, than NANOG.
And in response to Nate:
I was in contact with Google and after some convincing and detailed header
information, they acknowledged that they are having internal MX
On 10/06/2016 4:38 p.m., Mark Andrews wrote:
It would be nice to live in a world where that were the case. However, the
world we live in is run my bean counters, and the marketing department.
IPv6 is a huge project that is seen by them as an unnecessary expense.
Absolute BS. IPv6 has never
On 11/09/2015 1:49 p.m., Roland Dobbins wrote:
On 11 Sep 2015, at 8:14, Scott Weeks wrote:
For example, send me everything but the flash and images.
This is a preference setting on most Web browsers. Lynx works well
for this, too, on *NIX systems, if the users can use a terminal.
If only it wasn't on sourceforge?
http://ow.ly/OhNcR
(or the original link,
http://www.howtogeek.com/218764/warning-dont-download-software-from-sourceforge-if-you-can-help-it/)
On Sun, June 14, 2015 2:40 pm, Hicks, Byron wrote:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/routerproxy/
Is my looking
On 11/06/2015 4:46 p.m., Alex White-Robinson wrote:
Matthew Petach mpet...@netflight.com wrote:
On a slightly different note, however--while it's good to
have an appreciation of the past and how we got here,
I think it's wise to also recognize we as an industry
have some challenges bringing
I would support this. I've had a hand in supporting infrastructure
located in India and even with a relatively competent partner, some
challenges in timely issue resolution.
My current employer operate facilities in Singapore, Malaysia and China
with a lot more success (comparitively
I've had my team report false-positives with the Safe Browsing reports
as well.
On 9/01/2015 2:37 p.m., Michael Loftis wrote:
My problem with Google's Safe Browsing alerts is that from the admin
side they rarely are useful/useable. They make a big loud noisy
complaint without ANYTHING to
On Fri, May 2, 2014 11:57 am, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
On May 1, 2014, at 4:10 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei
jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca wrote:
Pardon my ignorance here. But in a carrier-grade NAT implementation that
serves say 5000 users, when happens when someone from the outside tries
to
On Sat, November 2, 2013 6:44 am, David Miller wrote:
On 11/01/2013 01:08 PM, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Anthony Junk anthonyrj...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
It seems as if both Yahoo and Google assumed that since they were
private
circuits that they didn't have to
On 10/01/13 17:15, Karl Auer wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 21:14 -0600, Otis L. Surratt, Jr. wrote:
FYI - I have a PTR for all IPs. Just general practice.
All IPs actually in use, or all possible IPs in a network? If the
latter, then it's not gunna fly for IPv6. Not at all. Not unless you
On 09/01/13 09:21, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 07:52:18PM +, Alex Brooks wrote:
I've just had a reply saying that nanog at
nanog.org has been added to their do not contact list. That means,
assuming their processes work, the address will no longer receive any
emails from
Yep. 'no servers could be reached' for at least one domain that's hosted
with them that i've come across.
Appears to have been the case for 6 hours as of about 30 minutes ago,
but just retested, fault appears to have cleared.
On 16/08/12 02:17, jeff jones wrote:
Anyone seeing issues with ATT
On 26/07/12 20:35, Lou Katz wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:38:31AM -0500, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On 7/26/12, Lou Katz l...@metron.com wrote:
One of my users has reported incoming mail failures, which I finally
tracked down. It turned out that Hotmail has seen fit to send the mail
to his
Set up
http://www.the42.net/networkjack/
Point her browser at it. Problem solved?
I drove the Ping, Traceroute, Dig and Whois requirements of a Tier 2/3
Helpdesk with this tool for several weeks - several years ago, I
suppose, but I still have a copy running which I use occasionally when
I'm
On 07/04/12 05:11, David Miller wrote:
RBLs don't block emails. Operators of mail servers who use RBLs block
emails (in part) based on information from RBLs.
If only one could convince end-users of this fact. More often than not,
end-user simply sees the company that they pay to provide
I used to use this form semi regularly. It's behavior has changed in
the last couple of months, after i'd finally gotten over the whole 'why
can't I just forward them the email' thing and gotten used to copying
and pasting the header and the body (seperately) into different fields
on their
On 17/02/12 10:08, Randy Bush wrote:
ok, this is horribly pragmatic, but it's real. yesterday i was in the
westin playing rack and stack for five hours. an horrifyingly large
amount of my time was spent trying to peel apart labels made on my
portable brother label tape maker, yes peeling the
I can imagine plenty of circumstances where someone might want
by-protocol indications of service, rather than the relatively basic
link-test that ICMP provides.
Another vote for iperf
Mark.
On 23/12/11 08:36, Sean Harlow wrote:
iperf might be able to do what you need and there are
On 15/12/11 09:54, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Keegan Holley wrote:
inappropriate. We are attempting to use Juniper single-mode SFPs (LX
variety) across multi-mode fiber. Standard listed distance is always
for SFPs using the appropriate type of fiber. Does anyone out there
On 15/12/11 16:38, Keegan Holley wrote:
2011/12/14 oliver rothschild orothsch...@gmail.com
Thanks to all who responded to my clumsy first question (both on
matters of etiquette and technology). The group I work with (we are a
small project acting as a last mile provider) was in the midst of
On 22/11/11 03:09, Tyler Haske wrote:
I really appreciate the specific insights offered by Keegan and Valdis.
- Linking me places to apply for jobs doesn't help. I'm aware of who is
considered Tier I, and how to find their website.
Don't limit yourself to Tier 1's on the outset.
A lot of
First
https://ciip.wordpress.com/2009/06/21/a-list-of-reported-scada-incidents/
On 22/11/11 04:32, Jay Ashworth wrote:
On an Illinois water utility:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45359594/ns/technology_and_science-security
Cheers,
-- jra
On 27/10/11 11:11, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message op.v3y8xvo6tfh...@rbeam.xactional.com, Ricky Beam writes:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:52:46 -0400, Alex Harrowell a.harrow...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why do they do that?
You'd have to ask them. Or more accurately, you'd need to ask their
system
Have found http://www.linkedin.com/groups?about=gid=94108 to have some
gems in it.
I mention only because it's otherwise a case of YAML (that is, Yet
Another Mailing List, not the logging format...)
Of course, not everyone uses or likes LinkedIn.
Mark.
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 16:09 -0400, Drew
Radio - That was very interesting to observe. Clearly radio stations don't
have disaster broadcast plans in place for content. When you're crying out
for information about what's going on, the very last think you want to hear
is an inappropriate advert break. The number of stations that kept
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Mark Foster wrote:
Radio - That was very interesting to observe. Clearly radio stations don't
have disaster broadcast plans in place for content. When you're crying out
for information about what's going on, the very last think you want to hear
is an inappropriate
On Fri, April 22, 2011 1:38 pm, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net wrote:
Bill Stewart wrote:
Rotating shifts between daytime and nighttime is a horrible thing to
do to your workers, both for their health and their attention span.
I Fully
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Jeff Shultz wrote:
On 4/15/2011 10:11 AM, mikea wrote:
My experience:
6 on, 2 off, 8 hours, rotating to the next later shift: I never, ever got
enough sleep -- for 2 years.
6 on, 2 off, 12 hours, straight mids, no rotation: much less bad.
5 on, 2 off, 8 hours,
I'm glad someone said something nice about Radio Hams on this thread
(which started as being about Christchurch!) or i'd have risked polluting
Christchurch's good rep with all this noise about whackers!
FWIW AREC (NZ's ARES equivalent) are active in Christchurch, mainly on
VHF, though there's
Folks on Twitter should search for hashtag #eqnz.
Major news sites in NZ:
www.stuff.co.nz
www.nzherald.co.nz
www.tvnz.co.nz
www.3news.co.nz
Plenty of Vids, Stills and some Streaming available.
Can confirm the reports of multiple casualties. TV News is live
broadcasting reports of many folks
On Wed, May 12, 2010 4:38 am, Justin Wilson wrote:
There are those ppl who just want to do e-mail, are comfortable with
dial-up, don¹t want to pay for than $5-10 for internet, and can¹t get
anything else.
Indeed. The arguments for alternatives based on the fact theyre cheap,
don't counter the
Does this not highlight a wider issue?
I realise that dialup is hardly 'cutting edge' but there are providers out
there with a significant number of dialup customers still on the books.
Surely there's still a market for (what should be by now) a
straightforward, well known piece of kit?
In parts
On Wed, March 31, 2010 4:42 pm, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
Is there anyone here who is legitimate using a freebie webmail account?
I am proposing that the NANOG administration drop everything originating
from commonly used webmail providers, and add further RHS filters as
additional providers are
Desktop switches. You know, those 4 or 5 port Gigabit Ethernet
switches. Apparently, many of them don't do any kind of STP at all.
Recommendations on ones that do STP?
If the network fabric you're on is important enough to cause you grief in
the event of a STP event, you shouldn't be
On Fri, March 5, 2010 11:37 am, Matthew Petach wrote:
Would anyone here know of any 24x7 contact at APNIC? The TXT records
indicate they just signed the reverse zone for 203.in-addr.arpa today, and
the delegations for our IP blocks disappeared when they did; and the
helpdesk is
currently not
Stateful firewalls make absolutely no sense in front of servers, given that by
definition, every packet coming into the server is unsolicited (some protocols
like ftp work a bit differently in that there're multiple
bidirectional/omnidirectional communications sessions, but the key is that the
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Nuno Vieira - nfsi wrote:
That's good to know.
I'll avoid using it.
Holy crap, what's with all the AHBL hate? At the very least they have a
responsive human and - last time I checked - they don't require an exchange
of money to get off the
I don't think self-reporting is the answer.
You MIGHT be able to determine location based on a traceroute, though
anycast would surely derail such attempts. I suspect most people rely on
3rd party GeoIP databases, and that those companies aren't interested in
hearing from you about your
On Wed, January 14, 2009 9:01 am, Graeme Fowler wrote:
I think there's far less to this than meets the eye, personally. Just a
predictably asinine salesperson believing that your presence online
provides your consent for bulk email... have you contacted their CEO?
I do have to ask though,
Refer earlier posts.
End points ('drones') would have to be legitimate endpoints, not drones on
random boxes. That eliminates legal liability client-side.
If the traffic is non abusive then I don't see the risk for the network
providers in the middle either.
If it's clearly established that
Funny this should come up...
I've found that a local Mobile Broadband outfit here in NZ are using an IP
range that Akamai's Geolocation service thinks is actually in New Jersey.
Causes me some oddness as a result - this despite the fact that Maxmind
has it correct.
Whilst investigating this
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Martin Hannigan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Frank Bulk - iName.com
frnk...@iname.comwrote:
I don't think there would be a concern about off-shore support if we
couldn't tell it was off-shore.
You can't tell most of the time.
The point that is relevant
I'm sure someone else must've seen it before.
Surely even assymetric peering agreements are mutually beneficial... ISPs
are also content providers, either directly or through their customers...
peering is going to have a flow-on effect in terms of reducing the cost of
offering content to the
Blocking port 25 has become popular, not only with
walled-garden connectivity services that are really scared of their
customers running their own servers (e.g. most cable modem companies),
but also with other ISPs that don't want to deal with the problems
of having customers who are spamming
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Simon Waters wrote:
If the ISP blocks port 25, then the ISP is taking responsibility for
delivering all email sent by a user, and they have to start applying rate
limits.
MUAs should stop sending email via 25 and use 587 or
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 02:01:48PM +1200, Mark Foster wrote:
So in terms of the OP,
I don't see why joe-user on a dynamic-IP home connection should need the
ability to use port 25 to talk to anywhere but their local ISP SMTP
server
on a normal basis[1].
Whats a normal basis?
My Home ISP
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 12:58:53PM -0400, Nicholas Suan wrote:
On Sep 3, 2008, at 12:49 PM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
You're forgetting that 587 *is authenticated, always*.
I'm not sure how that makes much of a difference since the
usual spam vector is malware that has (almost) complete
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Joe Greco wrote:
Speaking of cables and veering off towards cable-making, I was wondering
what people thought of the so-called EZ RJ45 stuff. One of the hazards
of doing long-term cut-to-length wiring is that if a crimp really goes
wrong, you might
61 matches
Mail list logo
