Hey!
New message, please read <http://theartistsontheblock.com/every.php?moj>
Matt Addison
Hey!
New message, please read <http://funezy.com/road.php?tu2>
Matt Addison
Hey!
New message, please read <http://eurohavenassociates.com/found.php?l>
Matt Addison
Hey!
New message, please read <http://epicuregifts.com/taste.php?ef>
Matt Addison
Hey!
New message, please read <http://austincounseling.com/opposite.php?4ujn>
Matt Addison
How much spare margin do you have? Could you roll your own with a pair
of mismatched (C|D)WDM XFPs and a mux on each end?
Sent from my mobile device, so please excuse any horrible misspellings.
On Apr 2, 2013, at 19:16, Frank Bulk wrote:
> Is anyone aware of a reputable supplier of 80 km BiDi X
VAR or Manufacturer? Mellanox are essentially the defacto standard for
IB switches and HCAs.
Sent from my mobile device, so please excuse any horrible misspellings.
On Feb 19, 2013, at 14:12, Landon Stewart wrote:
> Hello NANOG,
>
> We are thinking of utilizing some InfiniBand stuff for some sp
On Feb 1, 2013, at 22:54, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> If you have multicast and everyone is watching superbowl at same time,
>> you're talking up very little bandwidth on that 2.mumble GPON link.
>
> Meh. Since everyone seems to want to be able to pause, rewind, etc.,
> multicast doesn't tend to happen
They've had an on-premise product in the past, I'm sure it's still an option.
Last time I looked at their VRF support it was still lacking, there's
supposed to be improvements to it in 1Q13.
Sent from my mobile device, so please excuse any horrible misspellings.
On Dec 13, 2012, at 15:48, Eric A
phpipam's VRF support looks fairly decent if you haven't checked it out yet.
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 13, 2012, at 13:15, Walter Keen wrote:
> We've been using ipplan, although it seems the racktables demo site does
> support ipv6. It looks interesting because it could help us in other ways.
>
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Eric Krichbaum wrote:
>> Absolutely. I'd rather see it done responsibly. It's hard to get rid of
>> bad data/incorrect data/stale data and it shouldn't be. If done properly,
>> it would be much frie
Sent from my mobile device, so please excuse any horrible misspellings.
On Aug 29, 2012, at 18:30, james machado wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:55 PM, STARNES, CURTIS
> wrote:
>> Sorry for the top post...
>>
>> Not necessarily a Level 3 problem but;
>>
>> We are announcing our /19 network a
We're fans of Panduit self laminating labels wrapped around their
LabelCore product (which is pretty much just a piece of foam which
brings the diameter up to about to that of a cat5e cable). Since it
doesn't actually stick to the cable it makes it trivial to remove with
scissors, and you can slide
On Jul 17, 2012, at 3:15, Karl Auer wrote:
> Reading it with a squint: The phrase "packets [...] will be delivered to
> one router on the subnet" does not specifically exclude the possibility
> that packets will be delivered to more than one router on the subnet.
> Still, I do think it would be
On Jul 16, 2012, at 15:40, Oliver
wrote:
> Additionally, as an alternative to RAs, you can simply point default at the
> all-routers anycast address.
Wouldn't this result in duplicate packets leaving your network if
there were more than 1 router listening to 'all routers' and you (at
the MAC lay
On Mar 1, 2012, at 17:10, William Herrin wrote:
> If took you 50 lines of code to do
> 'socket=connect("www.google.com",80,TCP);' and you still managed to
> produce a version which, due to the timeout on dead addresses, is
> worthless for any kind of interactive program like a web browser. And
> b
On Feb 27, 2012, at 19:10, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Feb 27, 2012, at 3:50 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:43 PM, david raistrick
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, William Herrin wrote:
In some cases this is because of carelessness: The application does a
get
On Jan 20, 2012, at 12:49, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
> The web interface allows for interface aggregation, and the code for doing
> that could probably be reverse engineered easily enough for other reporting
> mechanisms as well.
On this point (of nice aggregation UIs) is anyone here using Graph
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 17:18, Brett Watson wrote:
> 6Connect definitely has a nice IPAM solution, right now more tailored for
> service providers but it's linked to the regional registries and helps you do
> requests for address space, etc. I think they're working on an
> enterprise-based vers
Sent from my mobile device, so please excuse any horrible misspellings.
On Jan 6, 2012, at 15:32, Bonald wrote:
> Hi,
> We need to purchase some switch that support 1gbit QinQ.
> Any suggestions ? We need to connect 9 schools together in layer2.
> All 9 schools have 1gb link from our provider, p
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 16:10, Zachary McGibbon
wrote:
> With all of Apple's updates today (MacOS, iOS, Apps, etc) we saw a big
> increase on one of our links to our ISP at 1pm Eastern.
>
> Did anyone else notice significant traffic jumps on their networks?
Saw a +300mbps (+150%) increase on my A
On Aug 20, 2011, at 3:09, Pete Carah wrote:
Note that he wanted to use fiber for lightning protection; the metal
strip rather negates that...
Only if you plug the metal strip into your equipment. We usually don't do
that with locate wires (they usually sit unterminated, or maybe grounded,
depe
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 21:11, Vinny Abello wrote:
> One of my favorite features in IS-IS is the ability to set the overload
> bit during maintenance. The effect is the router on which you set it
> isn't seen by any other devices in the topology as a transit path, but
> you can still reach the rou
On Jul 26, 2011, at 20:08, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> There's a subtle but significant difference between what cookies give you,
> which is "This is the same entity that visited our page at 7:48PM last
> Tuesday", and what easily trackable IP addresses give you, which is "This is
> an
> enti
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:41, Ray Soucy wrote:
>
> The energy in this thread should be focused on switch vendors to
> actually implement L2 security features for IPv6, which is usually an
> easy upgrade; rather than calling for all host implementations of IPv6
> to work differently; which will ta
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 17:25, Scott Berkman wrote:
> Otherwise, anyone have recommendations for another resource for this
> information?
>
http://standards.ieee.org/develop/regauth/oui/public.html
~Matt
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 16:13, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> I love this question, because it basically admits the protocol is
> broken. To make RA's even remotely palitable, you need "RA Guard" on
> the switches. This feature does not exist, but if we bring features
> like DHCP guard forward into the I
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:28, david raistrick wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>
> No, the point is that DNS resolvers in different places all use the same
>> addresses. So at the cyber cafe 3003::3003 is the cyber cafe DNS but at the
>> airport 3003::3003 is the airport
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:23, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> But all of this could easily have been avoided: why are we _discovering_
> DNS addresses in the first place? Simply host them on well known addresses
> and you can hardcode those addresses, similar to the 6to4 gateway address.
> But no, n
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 09:49, Chris Adams wrote:
> The difference is that in the widest-used desktop OS, "turn me into a
> router" is a single checkbox, while "turn me into a DHCP server"
> requires installing software.
Turning on Internet Connection Sharing also (helpfully) enables and
configu
> From: Mathias Seiler [mailto:mathias.sei...@mironet.ch]
> Subject: Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links
>
> Ok let's summarize:
>
> /64:
> + Sticks to the way IPv6 was designed (64 bits host part)
> + Probability of renumbering very low
> + simpler for ACLs and the like
> + rDNS
31 matches
Mail list logo
