Thank you, everyone, for your responses.
Abe, I appreciate your enthisam but it is obvious you are not interested in
collaboration. You are singularly-minded and trollish.
I am assigning your email address to my spam filters. I will not see any
future communication from you.
O.
On Sat, Jan 13,
I used NIPAP about seven or eight years ago. It's quite customizable and
easy enough to code against but not the easiest to work with, overall. It
has some quirks. I think I would have chosen Netbox had it been as mature
as it is now.
Oliver
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023, 3:41 p.m. JASON BOTHE via NANOG
I've found success with NIPAP:
https://spritelink.github.io/NIPAP/
I've built some yaml-based templates and python-based loading tools that
populate everything from the VRF to the prefix pools and descriptions
etc... in a pretty complex setup. It's quite flexible, though you will
spend some time
On Sun., Nov. 28, 2021, 17:13 William Herrin, wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 1:18 PM Karl Auer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2021-11-28 at 12:53 -0800, Michael Thomas wrote:
> > > I was reading their howto yesterday and it seems they are only
> > > allocating a /64? Why?
> >
> > That's a /64 *per subnet*
On Sat., Nov. 27, 2021, 12:59 Gary Buhrmaster,
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 5:05 PM Oliver O'Boyle
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat., Nov. 27, 2021, 10:46 Scott Morizot, wrote:
> >> Since we are deploying BYO IPv6 in AWS, I can assure you they do offer
> i
On Sat., Nov. 27, 2021, 13:34 Michael Thomas, wrote:
>
> On 11/27/21 7:46 AM, Scott Morizot wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 6:51 PM Oliver O'Boyle
> wrote:
>
>> They're getting better at it, at least. They also recently added v6
>> support in their
On Sat., Nov. 27, 2021, 10:46 Scott Morizot, wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 6:51 PM Oliver O'Boyle
> wrote:
>
>> They're getting better at it, at least. They also recently added v6
>> support in their NLBs and you can get a /56 for every VPC for direct
>>
or v4, but it will come.
Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Thomas
> *Sent:* November 26, 2021 7:37 PM
> *To:* Oliver O'Boyle
> *Cc:* Jean St-Laurent ; Ca By
> ; North American Network
> Operators' Group
> *Subject:* Re: IPv6 and CDN's
>
>
>
&
AWS has been gradually improving support and adding features. They just
announced this service, which might help with adoption:
https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2021/11/aws-nat64-dns64-communication-ipv6-ipv4-services/
On Fri., Nov. 26, 2021, 19:28 Michael Thomas, wrote:
>
> On 11/26
We have an office in Montreal that is showing signs of intermittent
routing issues. So can confirm there's an issue somewhere.
On Fri, 24 Sept 2021 at 11:25, Jason Canady wrote:
>
> We're in Indianapolis / Chicago and seeing 854,787 routes.
>
> On 9/24/21 11:17 AM, Eric Dugas via NANOG wrote:
> >
list.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 5:46 PM Oliver O'Boyle
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Just a reminder. The ticket remains unclaimed. If it makes you feel
>>> better, I'll raise the price from free to $10 :)
>>>
>>> $1800 USD valu
Just a reminder. The ticket remains unclaimed. If it makes you feel better,
I'll raise the price from free to $10 :)
$1800 USD value and the conference is excellent.
Reply off-list if you're interested.
Oliver
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019, 22:39 Oliver O'Boyle, wrote:
> Nanog:
>
Nanog:
I have a free AWS re:Invent full access pass for any community member who
can reasonably demonstrate regular knowledge transfer or contributions of
useful help to other community members in the past year+. Reply off list
with your evidence if that's you. Conference starts Monday in Las Vega
We apologize for finally getting around to our job and doing what we were
paid to do...
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 1:27 PM Matt Hoppes <
mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
> “During an internal maintenance cycle last night, 168,149 previously
> undelivered text messages were inadvertently sent
Well... they can until they can't because I'm no longer a customer...
On December 2, 2018, at 6:23 PM, James R Cutler
wrote:
On Dec 2, 2018, at 6:04 PM, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
I can't imagine how the corporate sociopaths could justify charging an American
recovery fee on a service delivere
Same situation with us. We have dozens of circuits with them as a result of
that acquisition and the previous ACI acquisition of Canopco and OneConnect.
Not impressed. Not a happy customer. Already flipping to alternatives.
On December 2, 2018, at 5:31 PM, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
GTT is rapi
^
This
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018, 00:32 William Herrin On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 7:58 PM Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
> > now, why does it matter?
>
> Good question! It matters because a little over two decades ago we had
> some angst as equipment configured to emit a TTL of 32 stopped being
> able to r
Same in Montreal.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:52 PM Marshall Eubanks
wrote:
> Reports (and humor) are flooding twitter.
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:44 PM Ross Tajvar wrote:
> >
> > You beat my email by seconds. Yes, it is widespread.
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Kenneth McRae via NANO
I am an exceptionally nice otter and picked up dig food and some basic
groceries before getting to the games late.
On your way back, the exit you need from the 55 to the 10 is closed and you
need to get off going towards Sherbrooke. Drive 10 km past the first exit
and loop back on in the correct d
There's no reason why it shouldn't work well. It's just a minor paradigm
shift that requires some solid testing and knowhow on the ops team.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018, 22:26 Eric Tykwinski, wrote:
> The funny part is I don’t like containers but love VMs, so kvm, vmware,
> citrix, hvm, et al.
> Not
whoisnt
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2018, b...@theworld.com wrote:
>>
>> FWIW a German court has just ruled against ICANN's injunction and in
>> favor of Tucows/EPAG.
>> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-4-2018-05-30-en
>
>
> Welcome to contact-free
Because we'd all have to show work to prove our comments are legit...
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:52 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> why is no one exploring converting this mailing list to a blockchain?
> major missed opportunity.
>
> randy
--
:o@>
https://www.opennetworking.org/
Hardware works quite well. I have a number of whitebox units deployed based
off their designs and will be ordering more.
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Ricky Beam wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jan 2018 02:17:59 -0500, Hank Nussbacher
> wrote:
>
>> so to clarify I am inte
Excellent, thanks! Will dig into it.
Oliver
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Ca By wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:01 PM Oliver O'Boyle
> wrote:
>
>> Agreed. There now. We need cheap, open source, options for widespread
>> adoption.
>>
>
> h
Agreed. There now. We need cheap, open source, options for widespread
adoption.
Oliver
On Dec 20, 2017 12:51, "Michael Crapse" wrote:
> +1 for Nat64. dual stack is just keeping ipv4 around longer than it needs
> to be
>
> On 19 December 2017 at 18:50, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> >
> > > On Dec 19,
well, then that's a
different story.
Thanks for the tip on IoT sizing. That's precisely the kind of thing i am
concerned about being constrained with in the future if we size sites too
small.
Oliver
On Jul 7, 2017 6:18 PM, "William Herrin" wrote:
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 1:07 P
the /48 but ARIN doesn't appear to agree with our justification
for a /36 thus far.
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Jima wrote:
> On 2017-07-07 11:07, Oliver O'Boyle wrote:
>
>> We would prefer to summarize at the /42 level, announced from our
>> last-mile
>> pr
Hello,
If anyone out there could provide some input or advice on how to best
handle our upcoming leap into IPv6, it would be much appreciated. I want to
make sure we're playing nicely and not causing anyone any unnecessary grief
before we deploy. We're currently in the planning stage and can make
Next -->
On March 1, 2017, at 9:31 PM, Ryan Pugatch wrote:
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017, at 09:29 PM, Oliver O'Boyle wrote:
Each device associated with the AP consumes memory. Small low-end routers don't
typically come with much memory. If you've got a lot of devices associate
Each device associated with the AP consumes memory. Small low-end routers
don't typically come with much memory. If you've got a lot of devices
associated with the AP you will run out of memory. I'm not sure how many
devices you're connecting, though. Three will not cause this problem. 30
might.
O
Awesome, some maybe in 5 years we'll see the speeds we should have seen 20
years earlier! Can't wait!
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> The government getting involved with the Internet rarely goes well. The
> FCC is a shining example of how to usually do it wrong.
>
>
>
>
>
small carabiner that
you can clip to the rack or to other stable items wherever you're working
(not individual cables in case you dislodge them).
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 11:58 PM, wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 22:21:48 -0400, "Oliver O'Boyle" said:
> > Just place a piec
Just place a piece of tape under the padding and it won't slide anymore. 5
seconds of extra work per end, though.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> The only problem I’ve had with those is that they tend to slide down the
> fiber and you can
> end up having to trace the fiber
Check_MK over OMD. Good event parsing capabilities. Easy to set up, nagios
core but rewritten app for much better performance. Multisite master/slave
capabilities +++.
Free or supported. Your pick.
On Feb 11, 2016 9:26 PM, "John Adams" wrote:
> datadog will do this without issue, and if you have
I used/inherited them in Montreal after they bought out a series of colos.
The corporate management team is good and I would work with them again.
They saw themselves as partners and not just a vendor. The local DC
manager/team was honest and easy to work with and they were very
knowledgeable.
The
I love cat videos.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Tony Hain wrote:
> Dovid Bender wrote:
> > I would. Once I see legal stuff I know to stop reading. It does not hurt
> > anyone. Not sure why this hurts so much. Some things will remain a
> > mystery.
> >
>
> No mystery ... It wastes bits that c
A bit of salt on that will help...
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Joly MacFie wrote:
> Crow for lunch today.
>
> On Wednesday, September 9, 2015, Larry Sheldon
> wrote:
>
> > On 9/8/2015 21:05, Joly MacFie wrote:
> >
> >> 3/10 for spelling
> >>
> >> adjancencies
> >>>
> >>
> >> or is that a
ion
> tracking this down. This just showed up in our monitoring and makes sense
> as we just brought up a new locked down domain.
>
> Robert
>
>
>
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:19:53 -0400
> "Oliver O'Boyle" wrote:
>
>> You can configure Windows to e
Precisely.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> Sounds like Opportunistic Encryption.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opportunistic_encryption#Windows_OS
>
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:53:46AM -0400, Robert Webb wrote:
> > There is no VPN in the picture here. These are stra
You can configure Windows to encrypt traffic based on protocol definitions.
E.g., Use IPSEC to encrypt all traffic on port 80 between hosts X and hosts
Y.
It's possible that such a policy is in place locally on the workstations
and/or servers and it's also possible that it's being enforced using G
Citrix Netscaler as well.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Robert Webb wrote:
> F5 Big-IP? Pricey but it should do what you are looking for.
>
> Robert
>
>
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:13:37 -0700
> Brooks Bridges wrote:
>
>> Spent quite a bit of time researching products out there looking for one
Done, thanks!
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Chris Boyd
wrote:
>
> > On Aug 12, 2015, at 7:53 AM, Oliver O'Boyle
> wrote:
> >
> > I missed the subscription info. Can you repost please? I can be #100 :)
>
> http://lists.nadcog.org
>
> Welcome aboard.
>
> —Chris
>
>
--
:o@>
I missed the subscription info. Can you repost please? I can be #100 :)
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Rafael Possamai wrote:
> I was actually surprised with how many people subscribed already. I think
> we are close to 100 already in less than 24 hours.
>
> I could use some help drafting some
>
>
> >That said this really isn't your problem. It is their problem.
Marc,
Your response surprises me a bit. I wish more ISP would consider their
customer's use cases more thoroughly and aim to address them as best as
possible. Regional differences in expectations are reasonable and provide a
32 bit connection with a 32 bit address will open up an three-dimensional
portal under the hotel. They all know this and work around it by selecting a
lower connection speed.
On July 10, 2015, at 3:59 AM, Alan Buxey wrote:
2 mbit is still more than 32 bit ;)
alan
Unfortunately, there are still some that would report 2mbit via dsl and
think that was ahead of their competition (and it might be in some
cases...)...
On Jul 9, 2015 5:51 PM, "Alan Buxey" wrote:
>
> >No. They should just ask, with the best >geek intonation, whether "this
> >place still is stuck
Unfortunately, the hotel staff wouldn't be able to answer that question.
But they might give them free internet in exchange and hope the guest
doesn't ask any more questions!
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> Oliver O'Boyle wrote:
> > It's
Absolutely agree. It's not their job to even know to ask for a specific
protocol version in the first place. Their experience should be as seamless
and consistent as possible at all times.
What we should be be concerned about is that the hospitality industry is so
far behind the game on technology
; -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Oliver O'Boyle
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 10:20 AM
> To: Mel Beckman
> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
> Subject: Re: Hotels/Airports with IPv6
>
> We manage 65+ hot
We manage 65+ hotels in Canada and the topic of IPv6 for guest internet
connectivity has never been brought up, except by me. It's not a discussion
our vendors or the hotel brands have opened either.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Mel Beckman wrote:
> I working on a large airport WiFi deployme
50 matches
Mail list logo
