You get a 60 day trial with unlimited bandwidth and full features. After
the 60 days are up, your throughput goes down to 2.5 mbps.
I recommend running the latest version, IOS-XE 3.12.
*Pablo Lucena*
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Sunday, June 01, 2014 10:38:01
Cisco's Pagent (a modified IOS image with numerous testing capabilities)
can also be used to do this.
*Pablo Lucena*
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 12:47 PM, chip wrote:
> Exabgp should be able to help you out here. Great for doing fun things
> with BGP.
>
> https://github.com/Ex
> please let us know.
> > We would be interested.
>
>
>
> --
> 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
>
>
--
*Pablo Lucena*
*Cooper General Global Services*
*Network Administrator*
*Office: 305-418-4440 ext. 130*
*pluc...@coopergeneral.com *
I have great hopes for Schprokits. The idea behind it is outstanding - an
Ansible for networking. It must be tough though, integrating all major
vendor APIs seamlessly into a product. I have faith in Jeremy and his
team...hopefully they are close to shipping code =)
*Pablo Lucena*
On Fri, Mar 13
tem:
>
> https://trigger.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
>
>
>
> On March 13, 2015 7:59:13 PM CDT, Pablo Lucena
> wrote:
>>
>> I have great hopes for Schprokits. The idea behind it is outstanding - an
>> Ansible for networking. It must be tough though, integrating all majo
>
>
> > When will router vendors learn to do even simple aggregation before
> loading
> > routes into FIB? It appears that most hardware will have plenty of FIB
> > space if this was done. Also that aggregated routes are increasing at a
> > slower pace.
>
> Howdy,
>
> You can get a good reduction w
I've also heard good things about ThousandEyes.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Nagios will do it at a pinch but only from one location. But if you want
> professional URL monitoring from across multiple locations worldwide, you
> need Gomez, Neustar Webmetrics
This is a nice Python implementation. Thanks for open sourcing this!
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> perhaps dissing someone for their free code is even ruder than not doing
> ipv6 in 2015? you don't have to use either.
>
> randy
>
DMVPN is very flexible, and is designed for this type of scenario. Cisco
definitely supports it. Not sure about Juniper, but its essentially mGRE +
NHRP. You can use IPSec to encrypt the tunnels, and if you require
spoke-to-spoke connectivity, there are some optimizations in Phase-3 DMVPN
that make
Cisco has an IOS version called Pagent which allows you to craft whatever
traffic types you want (you can even push MPLS labels on the packets if you
want). I've used this in the past for generating client/server traffic
flows and measuring stats on the flows.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Matt
so an interesting option =).
*Pablo Lucena*
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
> On 22 October 2015 at 22:57, wrote:
>
> > - Needing OSPFv3 for IPv6 when you're alredy running OSPFv2 for IPv4
> > is less than optimal. I believe nowadays several vendors
> A lot of carriers use ISIS in the core so they can make use of the'
> overload bit' with a 'set-overload-bit on-startup wait-for-bgp". Keeps
> them from black holing Traffic while BGP reconverges., when you have
> millions of routes to converge it can take forever. It's also a really
> handy
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Can we please get a filter for messages with the subject "Fw: new message"
> ???
>
>
So far I've dealt with it via Gmail's 'mute conversation' setting somewhat
effectively.
would need to increase the window to 1,048,560 KB, in order to get
around 100Mbps.
13.333 * 1,048,560 * 8 = 111,843,603.84 (about 100 Mbps)
*Pablo Lucena*
*Cooper General Global Services*
*Network Administrator*
*Office: 305-418-4440 ext. 130*
*pluc...@coopergeneral.com *
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at
> With default window size of 64KB, and a delay of 75 msec, you should only
> get around 7Mbps of throughput with TCP.
>
> You would need a window size of about 1MB in order to fill up the 100 Mbps
> link.
>
> 1/0.75 = 13.333 (how many RTTs in a second)
> 13.333 * 65535 * 8 = 6,990,225.24 (about 7M
>
>
> Modern TCPs support and typically use window scaling (RFC 1323). You
> may not notice it in packet dumps because the window scaling option is
> negotiated once for the connection, not repeated in every packet.
>
>
Absolutely. Most host OS should support this by now. Some test utilities
howeve
16 matches
Mail list logo
