Well don't forget, normal attacks launched from vDOS were around 8 -
16gbps.
On the Krebs article, he mentions "the company received an email directly
from vDOS claiming credit for the attack"
Now, if this holds true, it's likely that the operator of vDOS (Apple J4ck
was his moniker) was directin
Yeah, I see a wall of text, but no real evidence to substantiate it.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Try more facts and less emotion.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange
>
> The Brothers WISP
>
>
> - Original Mes
Nothing is going to happen. Cloudflare will continue to turn a blind eye
towards abusive customers, and even downright allow customers to HTTP scan
from their network without batting an eyelash. The mere act of scanning
isn't illegal, but it shows the kind of mindset that they have.
I believe a class action lawsuit would sidestep this. Don't quote me on
that though, I may be wrong.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Paras Jha
wrote:
> He's right, conspiracy to commit X is a valid criminal charge, at least in
> the US. Conspiracy to commit fraud, theft, murder,
He's right, conspiracy to commit X is a valid criminal charge, at least in
the US. Conspiracy to commit fraud, theft, murder, racketeering, etc are
all "sister charges" of charges of ones actually carried out.
Hi Randy,
I've found the vast majority of large service providers to be very
receptive to abuse reports when they contain evidence and valid information.
Regards
Paras
Hi Justin,
I have submitted abuse reports in the past, maybe from 2014 - 2015, but I
gave up after I consistently did not even get replies and saw no action
being taken. It is the same behavior with other providers who host malware
knowingly. I appreciate you coming out onto the list though, it's
Hi Jair,
This list is really interesting.
>From just a preliminary test, more than half of these domains are hiding
behind Cloudflare, and OVH has a sizable fraction too. I suppose it's
inevitable, given that both are known for having non-existent abuse
departments.
Regards
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016
ir network), and I'd argue it's Cloudflare's responsibility to help
stop abuse.
Just my 2C
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Paras Jha
wrote:
> Justin,
>
> The only problem with that statement is that it's not true: if you did
> terminate service to them, the w
tions where law
> enforcement has required that we *not* terminate service to certain
> websites. In those situations we are of course not allowed to discuss
> specifics.
>
>
> Justin Paine
> Head of Trust & Safety
> CloudFlare Inc.
> PGP: BBAA 6BCE 3305 7FD
, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Paras Jha
wrote:
> This is quite common, almost all of the DDoS-for-hire services are hosted
> behind CloudFlare, and a great majority of them take PayPal. Another one
> had even managed to secure an EV SSL cert.
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:24 P
This is quite common, almost all of the DDoS-for-hire services are hosted
behind CloudFlare, and a great majority of them take PayPal. Another one
had even managed to secure an EV SSL cert.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Dovid Bender wrote:
> I used to have a boss that was convinced that MCaf
Hi,
Try taking a look at Zoho, they offer what you're looking for for free.
Regards
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:11 PM, sam wrote:
> Hello if this is not appropriate for this list please excuse me and
> disregard this email. I thought of no better place than this place however
> if there is a be
The world of networking is in itself decentralized. In the event a certain
network starts behaving badly, other networks will take appropriate action
by themselves if they see it as a problem.
I see no need to become a nanny state over issues like this. If someone is
being belligerent and harming
We had the same issue, there's a form you can fill out on Google's site if
you visit the homepage from one of the IPs in question. However, I don't
remember the exact link.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Peter Loron wrote:
> Hello folks. An address we use is not identified as being in the corre
Just wanted to interject, the port density of the Arista switches is quite
impressive, especially considering the price point they're at.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Ryan Woolley
wrote:
> While the QFX in general is similar to Jericho-based platforms, I think the
> QFX10002 is perhaps not
vider for link with
> > commit
> > > 10ge and burst up to 100GE. It will be definitely cheaper and simpler
> > than
> > > your "magic" with IX cost reduction.
> > >
> > > On Thursday, 21 April 2016, Paras Jha > > wrote:
> > >
>
Interesting to see how the idea is gaining traction
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Piotr Iwanejko
wrote:
> Hello Nanog-ers,
>
> We are looking for a company that has >=100G connectivity to major IX-es
> (AMS-IX, DE-CIX preferred) with traffic asymmetry/heavy outgoing traffic,
> willing to rese
Page Not Found
Link wasn't copied correctly, the "consumer-privacy" bit was cut off.
Here's the working link:
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-releases-proposed-rules-protect-broadband-consumer-privacy
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Livingood, Jason
Hi all,
I've been trying to get this issue resolved for the entire day now, but NTT
has been pretty unreceptive here.
We're announcing a large prefix for a client across our network, and we
discovered some insanely high latency.
After tracking down the issue, we determined it to be something wro
Does anyone know of any IP space brokers other than Hilco Streambank? I'm
looking to get a feel for the market a little bit.
Regards
Paras
You got MITM'd
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Damien Burke
wrote:
> You should change your paypal password.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
> Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 10:27 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Southw
It's interesting that they'd call about DNS amplification... You don't
typically see DNS amplified floods coming from home ISPs. I would imagine
SSDP amplification is a far greater issue for any home ISP.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> I know. It seems odd, doesn't it?
>
Transit providers are the mdidlemen of the internet, I see no problem with
the concept of "double dipping". It's their fiber and infrastructure, if
you want access to everything on their network, including other people on
their network, pay for it or find a way to get access.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016
Hello,
Can a rep for GTT contact me off-list? I tried twice using their website,
but nobody has gotten back to me for a few days now.
Thanks in advance!
25 matches
Mail list logo