Hi Glen.
Here's some thoughts how Networking can learn from SDN:
http://forums.juniper.net/t5/The-New-Network/Decoding-SDN/ba-p/174651
/Pelle
Hi Jason.
>>> PoS failure detection happens in under 50ms
IMHO this is the most important part, fast *down* detection.
> It's not actually SONET all the way through. It's GigE from the router to
> the SONET node, an unprotected OC192 wave to another node, out GigE to the
> far end router.
If
> At AMSIX, a Cisco 12000 running IOS will get into trouble with the 170pps of
> ND seen there. AMSIX doesn't do MLD snooping so everybody gets everything
> and on IOS 12000 ND is punted to RP and when it's busy with calculating BGP,
> it'll start dropping BGP sessions.
Really? I've tried to dupli
Hi Owen.
> The downside is that it doesn't provide enough bits for certain kinds of
> auto-topology
> management that are being considered by CE vendors. I highly recommend /48
> instead.
I've seen this claim (you need a /48) from your side several times,
but never seen any explanation why a /5
Technically, no.
But you probably fancy annoying people. I wouldn't imaging anyone typing
that right on the first attempt.
On 17 Oct 2010 06:47, "Day Domes" wrote:
> I have been tasked with coming up with a new name for are transit data
> network. I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does
If it's a full STM-1, your client might be thinking of POS (packet over
sonet/sdh). This is (were) a very common high bandwidth technology some
years ago.
At least the 7200 do have cheap POS interfaces.
--
Pelle
(sorry about the top-posting, I'm on a mobile device)
> Is the CRS-1 hardware or software?
> Lots of custom hardware in there - but lots of processing cores that look
> suspiciously like software engines too.
It might well be software engines in there, but that's not the point
here. The linecards (MSC/PLIM etc.) in a CRS is designed to handle
wirerat
7 matches
Mail list logo
