I've found a VPS provider (https://www.vultr.com/pricing/) that offers
cheaper instances with IPv6 only. I suspect that there might be others, as
ultimately those sort of services can't really escape the issue by using
NAT.
kind regards
Pshem
On Sat, 4 May 2019 at 03:15, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
I can confirm that percentage (at least with residential customer base).
All big content providers and a number of CDNs will do IPv6 by default. One
thing that will heavily affect this is the CPE equipment (which might not
have IPv6 enabled or even be capable of it).
kind regards
Pshem
On Sat, 8
but with potentially less overhead).
kind regards
Pshem
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 at 11:27 Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <
> caeazirxu7dh9o9ewdjfiemgdu7dt4v62w5+9+ctj2-rqznp...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Pshem Kowalczyk writes:
> > With NAT I have a single entry/exit point to those infra
e fc00::/7 addressing or do
you use your public space (and police that)?
kind regards
Pshem
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 at 10:27 Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message sasavsnx31q_70q+udm1oeo...@mail.gmail.com>, Pshem Kowalczyk writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We're looking at rolling
Hi,
We're looking at rolling out IPv6 to our internal DC infrastructure. Those
systems support only our internal network and in the IPv4 world they all
live in 'private' space of 10.0.0.0/8. I was wondering if anyone uses the
fc00::/7 space for these sort of things or do ppl use a bit of their pub
It's actually quite easy.
Provider1 is present at Exchange1 and Exchange2, so is Provider2. Provider2
doesn't want to pay for the traffic between Exchange1 and Exchange2, so it
points a static route for all prefixes it has in Exchange2 via Provider1's
IP address in Exchange1 and does the same in Ex
Hi,
There are multiple ways you can solve that problem. We do the following:
1. Each region has its own ibgp cluster with 2 route reflectors
(usually the P nodes, since they seem to have abundance of CPU power
and not much to do with it).
2. All route reflectors (across regions) are fully meshed.
HI,
As far as I understand CX300 does not support vpls (only
point-to-point PWE3). I don't think that's even on the road map.
kind regards
Pshem
2009/5/29 Jack Kohn :
> Guys,
>
> Anybody any experience with VPLS on Huawei cx300?
>
> Jack
>
Hi,
I'm looking for a colo provider somewhere on the west coast,
preferably somewhere close to one of the peering exchanges. A virtual
machine will do.
I want to use it to run a small performance monitoring box
(traceroutes, pings, etc). I also would like to get a full bgp feed
into it so I can mo
Hi,
2009/4/28 Saqib Ilyas :
> Hello everyone
> In the context of a single service provider network running MPLS, if a
> number of bandwidth constrained LSPs are passing through a particular node
> and the sum of the bandwidth constraints for the LSPs is X Mb/s, then is X
> the upper bound on the t
10 matches
Mail list logo