I'd like to see an option for a larger private ASN block - 1K of private ASNs
can be quite a pain in really large organizations.
I have seen others mention this in the past - e.g.
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/158375
But apparently there's not enough traction to cause
On Saturday, June 08, 2013 6:44 PM, Ryan Malayter [mailto:malay...@gmail.com]
wrote:
Speaking from the content provider dide here, but we've always run IPsec on
DCIs and even private T1s/DS3s back in the day.
Doesn't everyone do the same these days? I find it hard to imagine passing
any
Logs from a Juniper router in a customer network - we had hundreds of these
affected. They all synchronize to internal hosts (172.20.167.251 and .252)
which are configured to get time from NIST and USNO
CORP-NTP-01#sh ntp as
address ref clock st when poll reach delay
We use the Brady IDXPERT label makers to create the self-laminating cable
labels and Brother P-Touch to label devices, etc.
The Brady label printers and supplies are a bit more expensive than the Brother
but it's worth it for the cable labels.
The Brother supplies are available at most office
Quality Union work!
-Original Message-
From: Miles Fidelman [mailto:mfidel...@meetinghouse.net]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 3:29 PM
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags
Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Eric Wieling wrote:
. - we're also Juniper and Cisco partners too but we prefer the Palo Altos
for firewalls these days.
Let me know how I can help
-Ben
R. Benjamin Kessler
CCIE #8762, CISSP, CCSE
President / Chief Network Geek
Zenetra Corporation
Email: ben.kess...@zenetra.com
http://www.zenetra.com
Office: 260-271-4330
From: William Herrin [mailto:b...@herrin.us]
* Carrier NAT...
I spend most of my days fighting with carriers to actually carry bits from
point A to point B like they're paid to do.
I'm sick and tired of them blaming CPE for circuit bounces and outages that are
magically fixed without us
From: George Herbert [mailto:george.herb...@gmail.com]
Let's just grab 2/8, it's not routed on the Internet...
+1
I was consulting for a financial services firm in the late '90s that was
acquired by a large east-coast bank; the bank's brilliant scheme was to
renumber all new acquisitions
On Mar 10, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Michael Holstein wrote:
Can anyone recommend a cheap Ethernet to Serial (RS232/422/485)
converter with functionality like the Lantronix boxes .. except one
that
supports access lists (nothing complicated .. maybe a list of 5
approved
hosts). I need a bunch of
Hello NANOGers -
I'm working on a project to migrate a customer from one Tier 1
provider to another at 50+ locations (all domestic US sites). Most of
these connections are 4xT1 multi-link bundles.
The old router configuration was MLPPP which was rock-solid for 3 years
(save for the
Hey Gang -
I'm unable to get to cisco.com from multiple places on the 'net
(including downforeveryoneorjustme.com); any ideas on the cause and ETR?
Thanks,
Ben
There has been a lot of good feedback regarding the deficiencies of the
7600 platform...
So, the new question is: what platforms should a small, start-up ISP
consider when looking to provide Ethernet services to their customers?
- Scalability - 100M, 1G, 10G access speeds (backplane limitations,
tables)
three POPs meshed together
On 7/22/09 9:39 AM, R. Benjamin Kessler r...@mnsginc.com wrote:
There has been a lot of good feedback regarding the deficiencies of
the
7600 platform...
So, the new question is: what platforms should a small, start-up ISP
consider when looking to provide
13 matches
Mail list logo
