On 09/25/2012 7:11 pm, Bryan Seitz wrote:
Recently began seeing things like this to the default GW from
inside and outside the FIOS network. Called tech support but all
they
could do was put a ticket in for the NetEng team.
http://pastie.org/4800421
http://www.bsd-unix.net/smokeping/smoke
On 09/25/2012 7:11 pm, Bryan Seitz wrote:
All,
Recently began seeing things like this to the default GW from
inside and outside the FIOS network. Called tech support but all
they
could do was put a ticket in for the NetEng team.
http://pastie.org/4800421
http://www.bsd-unix.net/smokepin
On 09/25/2012 9:32 am, Randy McAnally wrote:
Hi guys (and sorry for the noise),
Thanks to all those who replied as well as Charter's help we defermined
uRPF between Charter and some of their peers were filtering ICMP packets
making traceroutes appear dead. Compounded by the fact our
70.183 ms 70.151 ms
7 * * *
8 * * *
9 * * *
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 * * *
13 * * *
14 * * *
15 * * *
16 * * *
17 * * *
18 * * *
19 * * *
20 * * *
21 * * *
22 * * *
23 * * *
24 * * *
25 * * *
26 * * *
27 * * *
28 * * *
29 * * *
30 * * *
--
Randy McAnally
Cage nuts.
Sent from my IPhone (pardon the typo's)
On Feb 17, 2012, at 1:35 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Please post your top 3 favorite components/parts you'd like to see in a
> vending machine at your colo; please be as specific as possible; don't
> let vendor specificity scare you off.
>
> Ch
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 08:32:21 -0500, Ann Kwok wrote
> Hello
>
> Thank you for your help
>
> But we can't increase the pipe as we are using 10G switch.
>
> The congestion happens when the traffic is using 7G
If you cannot increase bandwidth, then you must increase the TX queue (in QOS
and/or port
+1 on lantronix. Also does serial console. Lots of settings. Beats the pants
off other units in terms of flexibility and configuration options.
Sent from my IPhone (pardon the typo's)
On Jan 30, 2012, at 9:11 PM, Jeff Fisher wrote:
>> Lantronix Spider is a small, portable, affordable and
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 17:40:23 + (UTC), Janne Snabb wrote
> I happened to notice the following at three separate sites around
> the US and one site in Europe:
Getting palo alto from east coast.
3 10gigabitethernet1-2.core1.atl1.he.net (2001:470:0:1b5::2) 8.166 ms
8.135 ms 8.103 ms
4 20
Not able to connect to 146.115.38.21 via fios or verizon 3g so the problem
doesn't seem to be fios specific.
Sent from my IPhone (pardon the typo's)
On Sep 22, 2011, at 9:32 PM, "Ryan Pugatch" wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Ryan Pugatch wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Anyone noticing any
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:47:39 -0500, Chris Tracy wrote
> In both cases, mtr shows ~50% loss beginning at google-
> gw.customer.alter.net (152.179.50.62), the first hop in AS15169.
> It's clear that I must be losing more ICMP than TCP packets given
> that google webpages come up fairly quickly, bu
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:42:28 -0500, David Hubbard wrote
> I was wondering if anyone has a howto floating around on the
> step by step setup of having an internal bgp peer for sending
> quick updates to border routers to null route sources of
> undesirable traffic? I've seen it discussed on nanog f
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:04:10 -0800 (PST), Philip Lavine wrote
> To all,
>
> Does any one know a Vendor (NOT Keynote) that can do sanity checks
> against your web/smtp/ftp farms with pings, traceroutes, latency
> checks as well as application checks (GET, POST, ESMTP, etc)
I've had good results
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:53:22 -0600, Blake Hudson wrote
> > # ip6tables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
> I guess the next question is whether or not it actually works correctly
You can open/shut ports but you can't do anything with connection state
(RELATED, ESTABLISHED, ect)
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 13:35:01 +, Andy Ashley wrote
> if you want the name). Also suggested to me was doing a swap with
> another provider in the facility but it seems as if cross connects
> may be prohibitively expensive between suites/floors there. Im going
> to wait for pricing on this and
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:56:05 -0800, Charles N Wyble wrote
> > The only issue I've faced is RHEL/CentOS doesn't have stateful connection
> > tracking for IPv6 - so ip6tables is practically worthless.
>
> H. Interesting. I wonder if this is specific to the RedHat
> kernel?
I've worked around
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:22:40 -0800, Charles N Wyble wrote
> For the most part, I'm a data center/application
> administrator/content provider kind of guy. As such, I want to
> provide all my web content over ipv6, and support ipv6 SMTP. What
> are folks doing in this regard?
The only issue I'
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:26:32 -, Ahmed Yousuf wrote
> We're doing BGP to announce our PI space and make sure that our PI
> space is reachable through both ISPs in case one link goes down.
> This is the primary need to do the BGP here. Unfortunately my boss
> has requested that we make use o
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:23:47 -, Ahmed Yousuf wrote
> - Accept that we are never going to get an ideal
> distribution of traffic and continue monitoring and adjusting local
> pref/prepends etc. as and when we need to change the distribution of
> traffic. Hopefully we don't need to
-- Original Message ---
From: Jeff Wheeler
Sent: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 21:01:12 -0500
> Are there any large transit networks doing /64 on point-to-point
> networks to BGP customers? Who are they?
Add HE.net to the list.
-Randy
www.fastserv.com
-- Original Message ---
From: Ken Chase
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 13:04:55 -0500
Subject: sudden low spam levels?
> I have two independent mailservers, and two other customers that run
> their own servers, all largely unrelated infrastructures and target
> domain
-- Original Message ---
From: Graham Wooden
> Hi there,
>
> I encountered an interesting issue today and I found it so bizarre
> so I thought I would share it.
>
> I brought online a spare server to help offload some of the recent
> VMs that I have been deploying. Around th
> take a read on this link
>
> http://www.faqs.org/docs/Linux-HOWTO/Bandwidth-Limiting-HOWTO.html
>
> -beavis
>
Another:
http://djlab.com/2009/10/limiting-bandwidth-in-linux/
--
Randy
> Soon several providers will begin offering dedicated servers with a
> 10Gbps connection to a single machine.
>
> -Drew
>
Several already do.
-Randy
-- Original Message ---
From: William Herrin
Sent: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:17:45 -0500
> I checked it out when I updated my credit card number online
> recently. The billing page has a place to describe a cap and overage
> charges. It's listed as unlimited. Not saying you're wrong.
> We saw further evidence of this on paths traversing global crossing
> to a customer last night.I don't know about others but we are
> intending to make some efforts to move traffic other places, this
> type of repeated failure is just terrible, especially since they
> still continue to an
Anyone with a Verizon network engineering contact on the list? There's a bad
router/link in Reston, VA for the past 36 hours that we're having a real heck
of a time trying to route around. Hoping we can get someone at Verizon to
take a look at things.
--
Randy
-- Original Message ---
From: Brielle Bruns
> See the response I just posted, but in all likely, he's being
> hampered by the fact the handoff from the ONT is 100BT ethernet and
> OpenRG (which bolts on top of a Linux OS and 'replaces' the
> functionality of iptables and such).
I've been using linux/iptables since day 1. 100Mbps is a walk in the park.
-- Original Message ---
From: Chris Burwell
To: NANOG
Sent: Thu, 27 May 2010 10:21:01 -0400
Subject: FIOS Router
> I'm doing some research for a group that has a 100Mb FIOS Internet
> connection at their
28 matches
Mail list logo
