to answer your objections in detail off line too.
> Just let me know.
>
Unfortunately, you don’t seem to be receptive to the numerous people
contradicting your assertions. So I’m out. I’ll let my comments stand here.
> Cheers,
>
> Etienne
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021
nd that's the impression that needs to be forefront.
> Power control, as well as any other dimensions of modulation,
> are detailed modes of operation that are well beyond the scope of a
> bare-bones 2-question survey
> intended to get an impression of how widespread DPDK's
Beyond RX/TX CPU affinity, in DANOS you can further tune power consumption by
changing the adaptive polling rate. It doesn’t, per the survey, "keep
utilization at 100% regardless of packet activity.” Adaptive polling changes
in DPDK optimize for tradeoffs between power consumption, latency/jit
> On Oct 26, 2020, at 11:51 AM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>
> If we're talking about whitebox router and ipifusion, what we're really
> talking about is vyatta/vyOS and the linux foundation DANOS stuff on an
> ordinary x86-64 server that has a weird shape.
>
Maybe tangential, but to be clear, VyOS
For the open source version we replaced our proprietary routing protocol stack
with FRR.
Since the AT&T acquisition we have also added support for a few merchant
silicon platforms in a hybrid software/hardware forwarding plane. ONIE images
are available from the same link.
Cheers,
Robert.
> On Dec 5, 2017, at 8:59 AM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>
> It is worth mentioning for those who have not seen a Ubiquiti "edgrouter"
> in person yet, or worked with one, where their operating system came
> from... When Vyatta was acquired by Brocade, the core Vyatta team jumped
> ship and were hired
ote:
>
> That's the problem though.
>
> Everyone has presentations for the most part, very few actual tools that
> end users can just use exist.
>
> On 1/28/2015 午後 08:02, Robert Bays wrote:
>>> On Jan 27, 2015, at 8:31 AM, Jim Shankland wrote:
>>>
>&g
> On Jan 27, 2015, at 8:31 AM, Jim Shankland wrote:
>
> My expertise, such as it ever was, is a bit stale at this point, and my
> figures might be a little off. But I think the general principle
> applies: think about the minimum number of x86 instructions, and the
> minimum number of main me
On Nov 22, 2011, at 9:09 AM, James Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:43 AM, lorddoskias wrote:
>
>> On 11/22/2011 3:38 PM, Deric Kwok wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Can I know any selection of Linux routers except cisco / juniper?
>>>
>>> They are reliable and have good support provided
>
> On Sep 13, 2011, at 2:45 AM, Roland Dobbins wrote:
> This contradicts my experience - I've repeatedly witnessed only a few mb/sec
> of 64-byte packets making software-based routers fall over, including just
> last month.
It's easy to get 6Mpps using Vyatta or most other software based router
On 5/24/11 3:25 PM, Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
>
>> I won't argue that an ASIC isn't faster, but it is hard to argue that
>> Vyatta
>> isn't capable of high-end performance.
>>
>> http://download.intel.com/embedded/processor/solutionbrief/322973.pdf
>
> aeh - mpps - mega packets per second - is rea
On 7/13/10 10:56 AM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2010, at 12:39 AM,
> wrote:
>
>> I haven't done real world testing with Vyatta but we consistently
>> pass 750KPPS+ without the slightest hiccup on our FreeBSD routing
>> systems.
>
> 750kpps packeting the box itself?
>
> Also, note t
12 matches
Mail list logo
