Couldn't help but notice all the Cacti screens open during NANOG51. We have
also implemented Cacti for our data collection and trend analysis needs.
Recently, support of our Cacti implementation, both server/OS and app, was
handed off to another group within my company. This sparked an intere
Any time mobile.
Regards,
Mauricio Rodriguez
Manager of IP/Data Engineering, FPL FiberNet
Email: mauricio.rodrig...@fpl.com
Office: 305-552-3418
Mobile: 786-236-2665
Pager: 786-236-2665
Sent using BlackBerry
- Original Message -
From: nanog-requ...@nanog.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent:
to:jeffrey.l...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Jeffrey Lyon
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 1:33 PM
To: Rodriguez, Mauricio
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Mauricio's FCP (was: Bandwidth Monitoring per AS)
> However, the truth is that we have outgrown our FCP. Â YMMV with the product...
Why is that?
Apologies -- That was supposed to be addressed to Rick only...
However, the truth is that we have outgrown our FCP. YMMV with the product...
From: Rodriguez, Mauricio
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 1:08 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Bandwidth Monitoring per AS
Sure, Rick. Maybe they can
Sure, Rick. Maybe they can buy ours off of us!!
;-)
Regards,
Mauricio Rodriguez
Manager of IP/Data Engineering, FPL FiberNet
Email: mauricio.rodrig...@fpl.com
Office: 305-552-3418
Mobile: 786-236-2665
Pager: 786-236-2665
Looking at possibilities for an implementation of usage-based billing, it seems
that the same techniques and tools always come up. I'm looking for some
feedback from the list on experiences with these tools and techniques as well
as alternatives that may not be listed here.
+Techniques
Recently, one of our Transit providers has started requiring a Letter of
Authorization for addition of any of our own Transit customers' prefixes to
their filters. The verbiage of the LoA basically states that the owner of the
assignment or allocation (not necessarily our customer) allows us to
7 matches
Mail list logo
