Hey!
New message, please read <http://bizarrevideo.com/telling.php?khaw>
Scott Francis
Hey!
New message, please read <http://kitchendesignvirginia.com/question.php?w>
Scott Francis
the recent facebook engineering post on scaling memcached to 200-300K
UDP requests/sec/node may be germaine here (in particular, patches to
make irq handling more intelligent become very useful at the traffic
levels being discussed).
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=39391378919&id=944554719
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Marc Runkel wrote:
[snip]
> Greetings all,
>
> We are a software development firm that currently delivers our install ISOs
> via Sourceforge.
> We need to start serving them ourselves for marketing reasons and are
> therefore increasing
> our bandwidth and gettin
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/DNS/DNSSEC.html
vote early, vote often.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],darkuncle.net} || 0x5537F527
http://darkuncle.net/pubkey.asc for public key
nice writeup by Mr. Cerf:
http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081001_remembering_jon_postel_a_decade/
I was not fortunate enough to have known Mr. Postel, but I have
developed a deep posthumous respect for the work he did from listening
to what others have had to say about him, and from using (and
ben
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Keith Medcalf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > If even one delegation is unsigned or even one resolver does not
>> > enforce DNSSEC, then, from an actual security perspective, you will
>> > be far worse off than you are now.
>
>> Why?
>
> If the local resolver does
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Jason Frisvold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Chris Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Chicken, meet egg.
>>
>> I think the point of the original post is that one end or the other has to
>> start things. At least we have one US zone
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/22/1253201&from=rss
nice to see a wholesale DNSSEC rollout underway (I must confess to
being a little surprised at the source, too!). Granted, it's a much
more manageable problem set than, say, .com - but if one US-controlled
TLD can do it, hope i
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Nathan Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18/08/2008, at 12:16 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>
>> haven't used routeros in a while but at the time it was inoffensive, it's
>> not derived from a general purpose system so it's not something you bolt
>> additional bits on
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:49 PM, David Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2008, at 12:23 PM, Scott Francis wrote:
>>
>> If we can't even guarantee
>> reliability with the small handful of TLDs currently in use, when we
>> start introducing arbi
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:06 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:24:48 PDT, Scott Francis said:
>
>> serve to increase complexity and add additional confusion to a system
>> that the standard user has just now come to grips with
>> ("ww
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Jean-François Mezei
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip conflict examples]
> Finally, will there be any performance impact on DNS servers around the
> world (thinking of caching issues) ?
more to the point ... what problem is ICANN trying to solve with this
proposal?
http://www.news.com/2100-1034_3-6237715.html
I find claims that "soon everything will be HD" somewhat dubious
(working for a company that produces video for online distribution) -
although certainly not as eyebrow-raising as "in 3 years' time, 20
typical households will generate more traffic than
On 8/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip details on keeping e.g. IP assignment data in databases]
> To an IT person this all may sound rather crude and hardly any better
> than just keeping a bunch of spreadsheets, but they probably never have
> to deal with the consequences
On 7/20/07, Scott Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
panther reports issues between L3 and e.g. Savvis, GBLX, PCCW and
others in the LAX/SFO area (we're having performance issues with some
of their CDN nodes in those areas right now). Possibly more widespread
than just California .
panther reports issues between L3 and e.g. Savvis, GBLX, PCCW and
others in the LAX/SFO area (we're having performance issues with some
of their CDN nodes in those areas right now). Possibly more widespread
than just California ...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],darkuncle.net} || 0x5537F527
encrypted em
17 matches
Mail list logo
