Hey!
New message, please read <http://bizarrevideo.com/telling.php?khaw>
Scott Francis
Hey!
New message, please read <http://kitchendesignvirginia.com/question.php?w>
Scott Francis
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Marc Runkel mrun...@untangle.com wrote:
[snip]
Greetings all,
We are a software development firm that currently delivers our install ISOs
via Sourceforge.
We need to start serving them ourselves for marketing reasons and are
therefore increasing
our
the recent facebook engineering post on scaling memcached to 200-300K
UDP requests/sec/node may be germaine here (in particular, patches to
make irq handling more intelligent become very useful at the traffic
levels being discussed).
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/DNS/DNSSEC.html
vote early, vote often.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],darkuncle.net} || 0x5537F527
http://darkuncle.net/pubkey.asc for public key
nice writeup by Mr. Cerf:
http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081001_remembering_jon_postel_a_decade/
I was not fortunate enough to have known Mr. Postel, but I have
developed a deep posthumous respect for the work he did from listening
to what others have had to say about him, and from using (and
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/22/1253201from=rss
nice to see a wholesale DNSSEC rollout underway (I must confess to
being a little surprised at the source, too!). Granted, it's a much
more manageable problem set than, say, .com - but if one US-controlled
TLD can do it, hope
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Keith Medcalf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If even one delegation is unsigned or even one resolver does not
enforce DNSSEC, then, from an actual security perspective, you will
be far worse off than you are now.
Why?
If the local resolver does not perform
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Nathan Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/08/2008, at 12:16 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
haven't used routeros in a while but at the time it was inoffensive, it's
not derived from a general purpose system so it's not something you bolt
additional bits on if you
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:49 PM, David Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 27, 2008, at 12:23 PM, Scott Francis wrote:
If we can't even guarantee
reliability with the small handful of TLDs currently in use, when we
start introducing arbitrary new ones to anybody that can pay, I'm
panther reports issues between L3 and e.g. Savvis, GBLX, PCCW and
others in the LAX/SFO area (we're having performance issues with some
of their CDN nodes in those areas right now). Possibly more widespread
than just California ...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],darkuncle.net} || 0x5537F527
encrypted
11 matches
Mail list logo
