Re: IPv6 and CDN's

On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 6:51 PM Oliver O'Boyle wrote: > They're getting better at it, at least. They also recently added v6 > support in their NLBs and you can get a /56 for every VPC for direct > access. I don't think they offer BYO v6 yet, as they do for v4, but it will > come. > Since we are

Re: DANE of SMTP Survey

On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 8:54 AM Bjørn Mork wrote: > Jeroen Massar via NANOG writes: > > > For many organisations DNSSEC is 'scary' and a burden as it feels > > 'fragile' for them. > > For "many"? Can you name one that doesn't feel like that? > >

Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 12:19 PM John Curran wrote: > I provide all of the above in the spirit of maximal transparency, but > there are indeed some practical limits to what can be provided. The > community should know that there was no special deal – only a clarification > that the USG sought

Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 10:19 AM Bryan Fields wrote: > On 3/15/21 4:01 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > is it possible that the DoD: > > 1) signed a lRSA (or really just an RSA) > > Just re-read this; I don't think the Federal Government is required to sign > the standard ARIN agreement. I

Re: Microsoft Exchange zero day

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 4:26 PM Eric Kuhnke wrote: > ISPs/NSPs with customers running self hosted or on-premises Exchange may > want to be aware of this. > > > > https://krebsonsecurity.com/2021/03/at-least-3-u-s-organizations-newly-hacked-via-holes-in-microsofts-email-software/ > > >

Re: Gaming Consoles and IPv4

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:30 AM Jeremy Bresley wrote: > I'm outside of Tampa (18th largest MSA in the US). The two providers > here, Spectrum (former Brighthouse area) and Frontier (bought out Verizon's > FIOS offering) are both IPv4 only (including on their SOHO/SMB offerings). > > So I'm

Draft of the next US Federal Government IPv6 guidance to civilian agencies memo released

Hello all, Since it's been released for comment on the Federal Register this week and it's something that potentially has ripple effects to network and equipment providers in the US especially, I thought some here might be interested in the following. Request for Comments on Updated Guidance for

Re: D'oH III: In 3-D! Plot Twist from Google/Chrome, Vixie approves?

+1 On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:03 AM Todd Underwood wrote: > the relevant sentiment is: thanks for whitelisting a fixed number of them > so i can block them. >

Re: DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct

On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 8:34 AM Cynthia Revström wrote: Hello Phillip, I feel like I have to say this, saying stuff like that "#triggered" is insensitive and as Alfie said, pretty tone deaf. Some of us live with and are working to better manage PTSD from complex trauma. I agree with Cynthia and

Re: Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Robert Webb wrote: > > From: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org] > > > On 18 Dec 2017, at 1:20 pm, Robert Webb wrote: > > > > > > Where I work I have the opposite issue. They have a lot of public IPv4 > > > space and only

Re: IPv6 deployment excuses - IPv6 only resources

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Jacques Latour wrote: > > Is there a list of IPv6 only ISP or services? I'd be curious to trend > that somehow, by geography, service type, etc... if any. > Since "IPv6 only" right now is primarily about those portions of the network

Re: IPv6 deployment excuses

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Matt Hoppes < mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: > Except the lady will eventually downsize. The college student will want > more and lease the space. > > Also, the 49,000 Sq ft office space that has been leased for 10 years and > never occupied will be

Re: IPv6 deployment excuses

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Matt Hoppes < mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: > I disagree. Any data center or hosting provider is going to continue to > offer IPv4 lest they island themselves from subscribers who have IPv4 only > - which no data center is going to do. > > Thus, as an

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

uff| Fax: 914-694-5669 > > > -Original Message- > > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Scott Morizot > > Sent: Monday, June 6, 2016 10:50 AM > > To: Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> > > Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.or

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

I have Hulu Plus and Amazon Prime. The only thing I would miss from Netflix is their Marvel original series. And I can live with that. I can't live without my IPv6 enabled home network and Internet connection since that's an essential part of my job. (I'm the IPv6 transition technical lead for a

Re: Netflix NOC? VPN Mismarked?

Well, I live in the US and this is a North American specific list (NANOG) and IPv6 is the resolution of those issues for us. I'm not particularly familiar with the state of networking in the rest of the world, so have no idea how much of an issue it is for them. And yes, TVs stick around for a

Re: Netflix NOC? VPN Mismarked?

On Jan 28, 2016 12:27, "Mikael Abrahamsson" <swm...@swm.pp.se> wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, Scott Morizot wrote: > >> Which brands are the ones that aren't supporting IPv6? > > > I just checked a Samsung "smart TV", it's new enough to have 5

Re: Netflix NOC? VPN Mismarked?

On Jan 28, 2016 08:21, "Mark Tinka" wrote: > On 28/Jan/16 15:46, Bacon Zombie wrote: > > > Do all "smart" TVs and Game consoles fully support IPv6 out of the box? > > The number is not non-zero, but it's not worth talking about based on > the small sample I did in 2015. I'm

Re: How to wish you hadn't forced ipv6 adoption (was "How to force rapid ipv6 adoption")

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > > > On Oct 1, 2015, at 21:47 , Rob McEwen wrote: > > Also, it seems so bizarre that in order to TRY to solve this, we have to > make sure that MASSIVE numbers of individual IPv6 IP addresses.. that equal

Re: How long will it take to completely get rid of IPv4 or will it happen at all?

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Bob Evans b...@fiberinternetcenter.com wrote: What will come first ? A) the earths future core rotation changes altering the ionosphere in such a way that we are all exposed to continuous x-rays that shorten our lifespan OR B) the last IPv4