I have had this same behavior at my UniFi pilot site. What I discovered in
my case was a combination of bad behaviors in both the UniFi unit and
Android.
Long story short Android really wants to hang on to a WiFi signal as long
as it can and does not seemingly scan for other signals when
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Joe Hamelin j...@nethead.com wrote:
Maybe because he has 130 sites and 130 truck rolls is not cheap. Also
company policy says no.
You are correct that deploying to a number of sites isn't cheap, but the
actual relevant question is how does this cost compare
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Joe Hamelin j...@nethead.com wrote:
Jonathan stated that they have health data on the network and only company
issued devices are allowed. I would suggest to him that he inventory the
equipment via MAC address (I'm guessing that it's mostly standard issue
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:44 PM, George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.comwrote:
This solution - the don't care solution - almost fails the
negligence test for certain security regimes including PCI (credit
cards) and possibly SOX for retail data locations (and HIPPA for
hospitals / medical
client-server DHCP was broadcast, as well as
server-client NACKs. Server-client offers and ACKs were unicast.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
, I could see it being used if the destination
is in fact an example of an attack site to prevent someone from inadvertently
clicking the link and getting infected.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
is the same.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
advertisements
or a malware. The method is directly change all 'http' to 'hxxp' in specific
uncompressed .exe or .swf files with a hex editor.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
bypass is to go back to using their own machines or compromised equipment on
higher-grade connections.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
on that port
would defeat the purpose.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
email from the same IP that's sending these messages, I don't know,
but they are not just blocking anything coming in from a random cable IP. I'll
bet it raises the spam likelihood or whatever as it probably should, but it's
not a total block.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
or minimizing the ability
of the thousands of zombies sharing an ISP with you from doing the same the
world would love to hear it.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
. Wireless carriers get a bit more leeway due to spectrum
limitations, but even there a 5GB cap is barely reasonable for an entry level
offering.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
, but are not
allowed to tether. The previous unlimited but throttled to 2G after X amount
of transfer plans remain available for those who tether.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
for anyone who's not at the scale to
be dealing directly with Tier 1 carriers. Capacity costs money, but once it's
there utilization is nothing.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On Jul 13, 2012, at 16:02, Grant Ridder wrote:
The admins say they are working on a content filter system. All you really
should have to do if do keyword filtering in mailman. I have this setup on
a maillist that i manage.
How well would that actually work against what seems to be a bored
On Jul 5, 2012, at 12:08, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
For those of us who have not kept up with every latest feature that Cisco
rolls out across all its platforms, can someone explain this new service? Is
it like Windows update, where Cisco will auto-update your router s/w and
thereby brick
On Jul 5, 2012, at 11:24, Joe Greco wrote:
And what happens when your *cough* router isn't actually on the
Internet? How can it be managed and upgraded on a regular old network?
If there is no internet connection, you get a very limited page that's
apparently only really good to get you back
On Jul 5, 2012, at 12:42, Jon Lewis wrote:
Routers are sometimes used on networks that don't have internet connectivity
[by design]. This seems amazingly short-sighted for a company that's been
around selling routing gear as long as cisco.
Not to defend Cisco's idiotic decision, but in
risk, they'll do it if they can.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
/Nationwide_Wireless_Priority_Service
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Emergency_Telecommunications_Service
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
landline. If they don't
have VoIP or it's not working for some reason, everything becomes a mobile call.
Again not arguing one side or another, just that there's enough mobile usage
that it would seem reasonable either way.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
in the same
data bandwidth (64kbit/sec/stream) as G.711.
If your carrier is forcing G.729 or GSM, they're a joke.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On May 2, 2012, at 15:52, Eric Wieling wrote:
I doubt the g729 or GSM codecs used by VoIP and Cell phones can compare to a
POTS line
with, so while us VoIP guys sometimes use their codecs (GSM for
example) they don't tend to bother with ours. That said, the article you link
is talking about the same sort of improvements by doubling the sampling rate,
so the end result is similar.
---
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
, the content is simply
activated, you get the key, your PC decrypts it, and you go play.
On a well designed digital distribution system the release second traffic spike
should be a lot less than you'd think.
--
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On Jan 27, 2012, at 5:35 AM, Tei wrote
I don't know if the box uses any different settings, but using the Windows
client on my PC with quality maxed just now I saw a consistent 5.35mbit/sec
during action sequences and fast-paced cutscenes, much less of course in menus
and such.
--
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On Jan 27
I was seeing the same problem, but it seems to be working now.
On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
works for me
ISP's control. On the other hand if things
start dragging on my home connection or anywhere else that I know I can expect
a certain result speedtest.net is usually my first stop.
--
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On Dec 25, 2011, at 9:43 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
Even though the faq's
structure that you may depend on
without realizing it. Be prepared to replicate as much of that structure as
needed to remain productive and not turn in to a slob.
--
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On Dec 5, 2011, at 10:09 AM, David Radcliffe wrote:
I do have to say to anyone planning
issue. It seems
to be resolved at this point, but we have not yet heard from Qwest what the
actual problem was.
This was with sites in Northeast Ohio and the Chicago area connecting to
servers in New York and LA for what it's worth.
--
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On Nov 9, 2011, at 1
wrong and when
it was actually fixed though.
--
Sean Harlow
s...@seanharlow.info
On Nov 9, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Preston Parcell wrote:
What was the timeframe for your issues? Just curious since we saw some
strangeness last night.
Preston
-Original Message-
From: Sean
31 matches
Mail list logo
