/inefficiencies at present time. It is a matter of
implementation/product design choice.
Sudeep Khuraijam
server product with ability
to support 10 gig interfaces in the same forwarding performance range
(which are in the market for a different scale problem in compute and net
I/O but exist at a price point that make them exorbitant to solve
forwarding speed).
Cheers,
Sudeep Khuraijam
On 1/26/15, 2
.
Cheers,
Sudeep Khuraijam
On 1/21/15, 3:14 PM, Nitin Sharma nitin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Ronald van der Pol
ronald.vander...@rvdp.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 22:55:04 +, Dave Bell wrote:
http://www.rvdp.org/presentations/SC11-SRS-8021ag.pdf
into that array. We save space by assuming it's a
single character.
Sudeep Khuraijam | Netops | liveops | Office 408 8442511 | Mobile 408 666 9987
skhurai...@liveops.commailto:skhurai...@liveops.com | aim: skhuraijam
to use BFD on
customer/transit-provider BGP sessions.
--
Jeff S Wheeler j...@inconcepts.bizmailto:j...@inconcepts.biz
Sr Network Operator / Innovative Network Concepts
Sudeep Khuraijam | I speak for no one but I
On Mar 16, 2011, at 6:05 PM, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
There a difference of several orders of magnitude between BFD keepalive
intervals (in ms) and BGP (in seconds) with generally configurable
multipliers vs. hold timer.
With Real time media and ever faster last miles, BGP hold timer may find
6 matches
Mail list logo
