|OK, so what happens if a transit router does not support IP
|fragmentation
All IPv4 routers are supposed to support fragmentation per RFC 1812 (Router
Requirements), section 4.2.2.7.
Tony
>> The mapping server idea that several proposals use do not appear to keep
>> the smartness at the edges, rather they seem try to make a smarter core
>> network.
>
> Is a DNS server core or edge? ILNP aims to use the DNS as its mapping
> service.
> ---
On Apr 26, 2014, at 1:55 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> the situation was created by the openbsd team, not the ieee, the ietf or
> iana. You squatted on an existing oui assignment used by an equivalent
> protocol and in doing this, you created a long term problem with no
> possible solution other t
On May 7, 2014, at 12:36 AM, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> VRRP/HSRP comes from Cisco (well, VRRP is RFC'ed for some time, but
> its origin is Cisco too),
I’m sorry, but this is 100% incorrect.
HSRP comes from Cisco, but Cisco originally decided to not release the protocol
to the IETF. [Stup
On Dec 29, 2011, at 2:27 AM, Vitkovsky, Adam wrote:
>> ... host systems should participate in IGP
>
>> We tried that.
>
>> It didn't scale well.
>
>> The Internet today is very different than the Internet in 1981.
>
> -did you? I thought CLNS with plethora of ip addresses compared to ipv4 was
Hi folks,
On Jul 13, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> I think Roland's point was that on "hardware routers", there is a
> separation of function between the control and the forwarding planes, and
> that the forwarding plane is designed to be able to transmit data in an
> efficient paral
On Jul 16, 2010, at 6:02 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> 1/4" plastic tubing -
> http://www.waterfiltermart.com/images/products/preview/plastic_tubing_and_nut.jpg
> garden hose -
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cd/Garden_hose.jpg/800px-Garden_hose.jpg
> fire hose -
If there is sufficient CPU power (and I/O to the CPU) as compared to the
bandwidth, then this is doable.
Tony
On Jul 19, 2010, at 11:40 PM, Akyol, Bora A wrote:
> Except that the goal you set below is very very hard to do on a software
> router unless its CPU has packet classification proper
On Sep 2, 2010, at 2:30 AM, Graham Beneke wrote:
> I have been asked to investigate moving an entire network to multi-hop on all
> the eBGP sessions. Basically all upstreams, downstreams and peers will eBGP
> with a route reflector located in the core. This RR will be some kind of
> quagga or
On May 12, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Does no one remember EGP? ASNs are MUCH older than BGP. And we were
> using BGPv3 prior to the existence of V4. We used BGPv4 back in the days
> when Tony Li would chastise us for reporting a bug in a 10 day old Cisco
> build sa
On May 12, 2011, at 9:41 PM, Brett Watson wrote:
> Hell, you knew from the image name wether Tony, Ravi, Dino, etc have built
> the image. It was quite personal back then :)
And then some bright fellow started hitting on our build engineers and... that
was the end of that. ;-(
Tony
11 matches
Mail list logo
