Re: DoD IP Space

> other can, and the things that don't have to, can't. I did a lot of > large multinational corporations using this type of design and never > even came close to exhausting 1918 space. Here comes your firewall rules and all your ACL ... easier with IPv6 imho -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?

he way), maybe some kind of 'mailing-list 101' can be helpful sometimes. Many $vendors are fighting hard to make people forget what an email is. -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?

. On 21/03/2021 17:29, Willy Manga wrote: > Hi, > > On 21/03/2021 16:00, nanog-requ...@nanog.org wrote: >> Message: 13 >> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 12:46:57 -0600 >> From: David Siegel >> [...] >> The board has been thinking about enhancements to the NANOG

Can rr.ntt.net have a AAAA record please?

ble a transition technique. Thank you in advance :) -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Reverse DNS for eyeballs?

( a subset of the previous bullet point) -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

G root servers unreachable via ICMP(v6)

ct ICMP(v6)? Thanks. P.S: I sent the same email to dns-operati...@lists.dns-oarc.net since 12 May 2023 but it's still in moderation.. If one admin is around .. :) -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?

se. A better alternative IMHO is to take advantage to the large prefix range and advertise a sub-aggregate when necessary. But absolutely not each end-node or customer prefix. -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?

nounced in BGP" [1] 1. https://rpki.readthedocs.io/en/latest/rpki/securing-bgp.html#maximum-prefix-length -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?

as precise as possible. -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?

forget you have 16x/36, 2x/33,4x/34,... You will have to insert statement for every single of them. 1. https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2023-October/223676.html -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?

h more experience than me provide clarifications here. -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ?

the traffic to the unused prefixes. Basically, I guess, it means that the AS 0 solution shouldn't be used, at least not usually. I wonder if anyone is using it , in fact. It would be nice to know if someone has the data handy. https://console.rpki-client.org/AS0.html -- Willy Manga @ongo

Re: RIPE our of IPv4

For existing members". It is said "No additional fees as a result of the issued IPv6 prefix will apply." Section 3.2. new IPv6-only members get discounts over 3 years -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RIPE our of IPv4

t. In this kind of environment there > needs to be a strong case to invest the capex to support IPv6. > > IPv6 must be supported on the CxO level in order to be deployed. I would have said the very very minimum could be to invest in a dual-stack 'proxy' for public-facing serv

Link-local v6 and mobile phones

tomer) ? -- Willy Manga (from where I stand mobile operators do not use yet v6 :-\ ) freenode: ongolaBoy Ubuntu Cameroonian Loco Team https://launchpad.net/~manga-willy signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

1 and 2606:4700:4700:: ) -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: WIndows Updates Fail Via IPv6

ck. > Disabling it immediately solves the issue. > > Quite odd that this is happening in 2018... IMHO the issue is in the network somewhere ... -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Value of linux net.ipv6.route.max_size

unterpart. 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813691 2. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/e022d597-302d-c061-0830-6ed20aa61...@qtmlabs.xyz/T/#u -- Willy Manga

Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable?

roach. 1. https://www.daryllswer.com/ipv6-architecture-and-subnetting-guide-for-network-engineers-and-operators/ -- Willy Manga

Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable?

is the more obvious. The only end-user who might stick with a single /64 is - 1 smartphone - 1 VM -- Willy Manga