Hi Eric,
with no v6 fs rules, the table inet6flow.0 stay hidden. Try to make any.
--
S pozdravem/Best Regards,
Zbyněk
Dne 21.05.21 v 20:10 Eric Dugas via NANOG napsal(a):
> Hello,
>
> I've been fiddling with JunOS to enable Flowspec IPv6. According to the
> docs, it was implemented in 16.x.
ave a session with to enable BFD there. If
they run carrier-grade border routes connected to IXP switches just with
fibers, it works pretty well.
So just try to talk with your peers about BFD.
--
S pozdravem/Best Regards,
Zbyněk Pospíchal
Dne 16.09.20 v 2:55 Douglas Fischer napsal(a):
> Time-to-
Dne 17/05/2018 v 18:14 Sander Steffann napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> But this regulation increases essential liberty for individuals, so I don't
> understand your argument...
No, it don't. It has two aspects:
1. It brings new positive defined rights. But as with any other positive
defined rights, it bri
Dne 17/05/2018 v 15:03 Niels Bakker napsal(a):
> * na...@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) [Thu 17 May 2018, 14:44 CEST]:
>> Agreed. This is garbage, un-needed legislation.
>
> Disagreed. These are great and necessary regulations.>
> I'm loving the flood of convoluted unsubscribe notices this month from
Dne 10.11.16 v 11:17 James Bensley wrote:
>> * Integrated IPv4/IPv6 protocol support in a single IGP implementation.
>
> This is in OSPv3.
In theory, yes. In the real world operators need MPLS label
distribution, which is still not supported in many implementations.
Regards,
Zbynek
Dne 27.09.16 v 16:30 Mikael Abrahamsson napsal(a):
> The first page was completely devoid of any real technical information
> until I found the PDF (which from the color choice doesn't even look
> like a link). (https://www.nix.cz/cs/file/NIX_RULES_FENIX)
>
> It's still not obvious what the FENIX
Dne 27.09.16 v 15:17 Mikael Abrahamsson napsal(a):
> Hm, so the IX operator looks at packets at the IX (sFlow perhaps), see
> who is sending attack packets, and if they're spoofed, this ISP is then
> put in "quarantine", ie their IX port is basically now useless.
Definitely not. Try to read first
The implementation of BCP38 over local market strongly increased after
massive DDoS attacks in 2013 affecting major part of the industry thanks
to an initiative of the most important local IXP.
There is a special separate last-resort "island mode" network, which is
intended to be activated in case
Dne 16.06.16 v 17:17 Niels Bakker napsal(a):
> * zby...@dialtelecom.cz (Zbyněk Pospíchal) [Thu 16 Jun 2016, 14:23 CEST]:
>> Are you sure they still want them if they have to pay for these
>> features separately?
>>
>> Currently, such luxury functions are increasing cos
Dne 15.06.16 v 20:10 Mikael Abrahamsson napsal(a):
> Well, the customers also wanted more functions and features. They wanted
> sFLOW statistics to show traffic, customer portals, better SLAs,
> distributed IXes, remote peering, more hand-holding when connecting etc.
Are you sure they still want
10 matches
Mail list logo
