Hi Chris,
I remember this. I remember it in an early IP RFC, but couldn't find it in 10
minutes of searching. It had to do with intefaces cannot have overlapping
address space. One of the IETF greybeards ought to know.
It's been a while since I was writing code with marked up rfc's in fro
Hi Peter,
You wrote:
> So, let's see. I'm pulling numbers out of my butt here,
> Total cost...is about $3000 per mile for equipment
> It could run on an overhead monorail
> Network it all
> Confickr-type domains to make sure
I get the feeling you haven't deployed or operated lar
Peter Beckman [mailto:beck...@angryox.com] wrote:
>Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 11:19 AM
>To: Dylan Ebner
>Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>Subject: RE: Fiber cut in SF area
>
>On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Dylan Ebner wrote:
>
>> It will be easier to get more divergence than secure all the
>> manholes in the country.
More likely spoofed sources.
Good luck.
>-Original Message-
>From: ext Charles Wyble [mailto:char...@thewybles.com]
>Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 12:40 PM
>To: Thomas P. Galla
>Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>Subject: Re: microsoft please contact me off list
>
>You are getting dossed from a Mic
Yes and no.
Yes, in that it does best path selection, no in that it does not use BGP, since
low cost assumes DSL or cable, over which I've never seen BGP deployed. This
class of device assumes an appliance at each end. Performance data is
collected, compression and load balancing techniques a
5 matches
Mail list logo
