RE: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration

2012-11-28 Thread david.binet
Hi, > -Message d'origine- > De : Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swm...@swm.pp.se] > Envoyé : mercredi 28 novembre 2012 07:57 > À : nanog@nanog.org > Objet : Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Cameron Byrne wrote: > > > Verizon in the USA does have iOS on

RE: NY Times on IPv4 depletion

2011-02-15 Thread david.binet
Dear all, Actually I fully agree with Cameron. >From an operator point of view, it is quite difficult to rely on some specific >functions in mobile, besides an IPv6 stack - that is already difficult to get >if we have a look on IPv6-ready devices available on market. I do not know how >we can

RE: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today?

2010-01-15 Thread david.binet
Hello, Thank you for launching such useful discussions for operators. IPv6 introduction in mobile networks is certainly one major issue we have to consider for services and business development. As you stated, pressure on public and private IPv4 addresses is more and more important and we have

RE: Where to buy Internet IP addresses

2009-05-06 Thread david.binet
Some times ago, i would say 6 or 7 years, there was a BoF proposition at IETF to deal with such issue. Work areas were to propagate routing mesh configuration information and automatic assignment of subnet prefixes to links. There were quite a lot of persons interested in such issues and some d