RE: (Network Orchestrators evaluation) : tail-f vs Anuta vs UBIqube vs OpenDaylight

2017-08-24 Thread Christopher J. Wolff
Haven't looked at Cisco DNA yet? -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Kasper Adel Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 8:02 PM To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: (Network Orchestrators evaluation) : tail-f vs Anuta vs UBIqube vs OpenDaylig

Re: (Network Orchestrators evaluation) : tail-f vs Anuta vs UBIqube vs OpenDaylight

2017-08-15 Thread James Bensley
On 10 August 2017 at 02:01, Kasper Adel wrote: > Hi, Hi Kim, > This is not a vendor bashing thread. > > We are a group of networking engineers less experience with software) in > the middle of the process of procuring a network automation/orchestration > controller, if

Re: (Network Orchestrators evaluation) : tail-f vs Anuta vs UBIqube vs OpenDaylight

2017-08-10 Thread Raymond Burkholder
> On 9 Aug 2017, at 22:01, Kasper Adel wrote: > > We are a group of networking engineers less experience with software) in > the middle of the process of procuring a network automation/orchestration > controller, if that is even a good definition and we are clueless on

(Network Orchestrators evaluation) : tail-f vs Anuta vs UBIqube vs OpenDaylight

2017-08-09 Thread Kasper Adel
Hi, This is not a vendor bashing thread. We are a group of networking engineers less experience with software) in the middle of the process of procuring a network automation/orchestration controller, if that is even a good definition and we are clueless on how to evaluate them. Other than the