On 11/Nov/16 21:34, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Has the name been a problem for you? Asking vendors about support
> must be a bit awkward these days.
Why do you reckon?
Mark.
On 11/Nov/16 08:22, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
>
> We have a similar use case, and we run BGP on Quagga. Works great.
> Haven't seen a need for either IS-IS or OSPF on Quagga yet.
Two reasons for us:
* IGP metrics in the IGP will determine latency-based decisions. I
know BGP can infer the
> > I think people were looking for specifics about the implementation
> > deficits in the junos version which caused enough problems to justify
> > the term "not getting it"?
>
> The only IS-IS implementation we struggle with is Quagga.
>
> For that, we run OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 on Quagga and redist
On 11/Nov/16 02:00, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> That said, glance across the landscape as a whole of all of the routing
> platforms out there. Hardware AND softwsre. Which ones support bare bones
> IS-IS? Which ones have a decent subset of extensions? Are they comparable
> or compatible with others?
On 10/Nov/16 23:53, Charles van Niman wrote:
> I don't think Nick asked for a list, just one single thing, any one
> thing. To me at least, it doesn't really make sense to make the
> statement you did, without pointing out what can be done to improve
> the situation. I would be very interested t
On 10/Nov/16 21:23, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> I think people were looking for specifics about the implementation
> deficits in the junos version which caused enough problems to justify
> the term "not getting it"?
The only IS-IS implementation we struggle with is Quagga.
For that, we run OSPFv2
On 10/Nov/16 11:03, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> as painful as ospf
If I did run OSPF, I'd probably do it with a single area, likely OSPFv3
with IPv4 address family support. Kinky, but it is 2016...
>
> in a research rack with more than one router, i run is-is.
Good man :-)...
Mark.
7 matches
Mail list logo
