[no subject]

2022-06-20 Thread Glenn Kelley
Good Monday Morning Everyone. Quick Question: What is everyone's favorite software for running a looking glass. A friend asked me this over the weekend - and while there are others available on the internet to use - it would be helpful for them to run one within their own network. It has been a

[no subject]

2019-12-19 Thread Rich Kulawiec
Bcc: Subject: Re: FCC proposes $10 Million fine for spoofed robocalls Reply-To: In-Reply-To: On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:34:48AM -0800, William Herrin wrote: > I don't want to start an arms race with the spam callers, I want to > end it. That means: jump directly to something they can't easily

[no subject]

2016-12-02 Thread Rich Kulawiec
Cc Bcc: Subject: Re: Avalanche botnet takedown Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <32993.1480633...@segfault.tristatelogic.com> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:01:50PM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > As you probably know Rich, that's not exactly a novel observation. Vixie > was already saying it a full six

[no subject]

2015-05-20 Thread Marty Strong via NANOG
This post was from a subscriber whose From: address domain has a DMARC policy of reject or quarantine. The NANOG mailing list has automatically wrapped this message to prevent other subscribers mail systems from rejecting it.--- Begin Message --- It was resolved at around 2015-05-20 17:18 UTC Rega

[no subject]

2015-05-19 Thread Ryan Shea via NANOG
This post was from a subscriber whose From: address domain has a DMARC policy of reject or quarantine. The NANOG mailing list has automatically wrapped this message to prevent other subscribers mail systems from rejecting it.--- Begin Message --- Manually setting up and parsing email notifications

[no subject]

2015-05-07 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Paul Ferguson via N ANOG writes: > > Does anyone any else find it weird that the last dozen or so messages > from the list have been .eml attachments? Nanog is encapsulating messages that are DKIM signed. Your mailer may not be properly handling Content-Type: message/rfc82

[no subject]

2015-05-07 Thread Joel Esler (jesler) via NANOG
--- Begin Message --- Seeing them here too. -- Joel Esler Sent from my iPhone On May 7, 2015, at 9:58 PM, Paul Ferguson via NANOG mailto:nanog@nanog.org>> wrote: --- End Message ---

[no subject]

2015-05-07 Thread Nathan Angelacos via NANOG
--- Begin Message --- Looks like there's an extra line break after this header line: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP So the SMTP headers are getting partitioned. --- End Message ---

[no subject]

2015-05-07 Thread Nathan Angelacos via NANOG
--- Begin Message --- Looks like there's an extra line break after: --- End Message ---

[no subject]

2015-05-07 Thread Mike Hammett via NANOG
--- Begin Message --- I've seen the same over here and also considered it weird. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Paul Ferguson via NANOG" To: "NANOG" Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2015 8:56:44 PM --- End Message

[no subject]

2015-05-07 Thread Paul Ferguson via NANOG
--- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Does anyone any else find it weird that the last dozen or so messages from the list have been .eml attachments? Or is it just me? - - ferg - -- Paul Ferguson PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2 Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C

[no subject]

2015-05-07 Thread Josh Reynolds via NANOG
--- Begin Message --- What churn rates are you talking about? Josh Reynolds CIO, SPITwSPOTS www.spitwspots.com On 05/07/2015 05:36 PM, Watson, Bob wrote: Many of these churn rates result from problems self inflicted hence all the dramatic sdn promises, popularity in abstractions, Api all the

[no subject]

2015-05-07 Thread Watson, Bob via NANOG
--- Begin Message --- Many of these churn rates result from problems self inflicted hence all the dramatic sdn promises, popularity in abstractions, Api all the things, let's go yang/netconf and retrofit every ietf standard. There's benefits but gotta rant a little. What's better than correct

[no subject]

2015-05-07 Thread Jimmy Hess via NANOG
--- Begin Message --- On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > Ah...got it, this was sloppy phrasing on my part. I meant "first" > in the sense of "first rule that one should write". Depending on Security best practice to always have an active "cleanup" rule for every traffic dir

[no subject]

2015-05-07 Thread Randy Bush via NANOG
--- Begin Message --- > ZTE and Huawei, the big chinese vendors, have also been mentioned to > us. I know there are large national security issues with using these > vendors in the US uh, you have not seen the lovely picture of the nsa implanting a cisco? randy --- End Message ---

[no subject]

2015-05-07 Thread Paul Stewart via NANOG
--- Begin Message --- Well said Mark ... There's a certain large transit provider that this all the time and I never understood why ... Paul -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 5:32 AM To: Martin T; nanog@

[no subject]

2015-05-07 Thread Steve Dodd via NANOG
--- Begin Message --- On 5/6/15, 4:56 PM, "Randy Bush" wrote: >a fellow researcher wants > >> to make the case that in some scenarios it is very important for a >> network operator to be able to specify that traffic should *not* >> traverse a certain switch/link/group of switches/gr

[no subject]

2015-05-07 Thread Mark Tinka via NANOG
--- Begin Message --- On 7/May/15 15:16, Phil Bedard wrote: > Forgot to send this yesterday… > > We use them in our networks along with ASR9Ks and MXs. There are a lot of > them deployed around the world doing very similar things as ASRs and MXs. > The config is more like Juniper than Cisco

[no subject]

2015-05-04 Thread Sebastian Spies via NANOG
This post was from a subscriber whose From: address domain has a DMARC policy of reject or quarantine. The NANOG mailing list has automatically wrapped this message to prevent other subscribers mail systems from rejecting it.--- Begin Message --- Hey there, considering the state of this discussion

[no subject]

2015-04-27 Thread Elizabeth Zwicky via NANOG
--- Begin Message --- http://postmaster.yahoo.com will allow you to contact the postmaster team for assistance. I've reported this error already, but fixing it won't help you any; basically, the web page without the link is all Yahoo's willing to publicly say about that error message, you'll nee

[no subject]

2014-03-27 Thread rw...@ropeguru.com
So I certainly admit I am a basic networking guy and in the past have not had to get into the nitty gritty of port statistics. I am trying to understand some statistics off a switch port in a Nexus 4001i. All TX and RX counters look normal except on the TX side, I am showing 1107597  input disca

[no subject]

2014-03-14 Thread MKS
Hi list I'm looking for a DNS solution to do a parental controls for a small ISP, as in ISP branded services. OpenDNS only supports corporate customers . Please contact me off or on-list, if you have any vendors that you can recommend. Regards MKS

[no subject]

2012-12-11 Thread flower tailor
Delete me

[no subject]

2012-09-12 Thread flower tailor
Delete me

[no subject]

2012-08-21 Thread valdis . kletnieks
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:11:49 -0500, Grant Ridder said: > I love spam from Honduras. I am hoping that someone is going to kick this > email from the members list. I'm hoping for something a tad more drastic. The bozo has an upstream, and this is NANOG. :) pgptOTAFjVT43.pgp Description: PGP signa

[no subject]

2012-05-06 Thread Jhon Dave Bayawa
thankyou   Jhon Dave Bayawa

[no subject]

2011-10-05 Thread Dennis Reak

[no subject]

2011-08-20 Thread Payam Poursaied

[no subject]

2011-07-17 Thread Uri Joskovitch
_ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog

[no subject]

2011-04-07 Thread Yin To Chu

[no subject]

2011-02-12 Thread Mike Perkins
Sent from my iPhone. I blame all misspellings on the autocorrect.

[no subject]

2010-12-13 Thread Atticus
Cc

[no subject]

2010-01-14 Thread Burns, Kevin
Unsubscribe

[no subject]

2009-11-19 Thread Adam Gray

[no subject]

2009-05-27 Thread gb10hkzo-nanog
> fc00:836b:4917::a180:4179 And yes, before anyone points out, I just realised I posted an abbreviated example. :)

[no subject]

2009-05-07 Thread Rich Kulawiec
Cc Bcc: Subject: Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20090507161041.f1711126.da...@druid.net> On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:10:41PM -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > It is. I understand what they are trying to do but we were cut off > from some places because someone else in the huge ups

[no subject]

2009-02-19 Thread kb3ien+nanog
protect users from victimisation by the likes of this : http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/topic204619.html For years (decades?) I've been DNS hijacking to criple worm ridden machines associating with my wifi nodes etc. That only deals with a few threats. I'd like to feel confident in us

[no subject]

2009-01-11 Thread Aaron Imbrock
Stop

[no subject]

2008-11-24 Thread nanog-bounces
DATA Subject: RE: Qwest Issues? Sorry, yes..Plano/Dallas, TX > Anything that might narrow down the region? Perhaps a state? Im seeing > sprint issues (who isn't) but nothing with my qwest t's in Colorado, or the > link to a datacenter in seattle.