Looking for feedback/recommendations on higher density Switch’s in the
10GBASE-T arena.
Preferably TOR switches if possible.
Minimum 16 ports usable for Rack Server connectivity + Uplinks to Collapsed
Twin Distro/Core setup.
Found the Arista 7X00 family to have the density I am looking for but
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:33 +, Roberts, Brent wrote:
Looking for feedback/recommendations on higher density Switch’s in the
10GBASE-T arena.
Preferably TOR switches if possible.
Minimum 16 ports usable for Rack Server connectivity + Uplinks to
Collapsed Twin Distro/Core setup.
Found the
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:33:50AM +, Roberts, Brent wrote:
Looking for feedback/recommendations on higher density Switch’s in the
10GBASE-T arena.
Preferably TOR switches if possible.
Minimum 16 ports usable for Rack Server connectivity + Uplinks to Collapsed
Twin Distro/Core setup.
Juniper EX4500 has 40 fixed SFP/SFP+ ports plus 2 uplink modules that
can contain 4 SFP/SFP+ ports each for a total of 48 10GBASE-X ports.
Need to buy SFP+ modules or use direct-attach SFP+ cables though.
And is now shipping with a model that can stack and/or join a EX4200 VC stack.
It's
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:05:54AM -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
Juniper EX4500 has 40 fixed SFP/SFP+ ports plus 2 uplink modules that
can contain 4 SFP/SFP+ ports each for a total of 48 10GBASE-X ports.
Be aware, that IGMP snooping breaks some(!) IPv6 multicast (e.g.
DHCPv6). Affects whole
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:33:43PM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:05:54AM -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
Juniper EX4500 has 40 fixed SFP/SFP+ ports plus 2 uplink modules that
can contain 4 SFP/SFP+ ports each for a total of 48 10GBASE-X ports.
Be aware, that IGMP
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 20:33 +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Be aware, that IGMP snooping breaks some(!) IPv6 multicast (e.g.
DHCPv6). Affects whole EX-series and current plan is to fix it sometime
end of year (Q4 release). If you use IPv4 multicast and need IGMP
snooping to prevent flooding and
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 06:52:07AM +1100, Karl Auer wrote:
Not disagreeing, I've never met this device, just curious about the
problem and wondering if it is a generic class of problem.
Is this device supposed to be IPv6-capable?
We're using EX switches currently only in L2-only roles,
8 matches
Mail list logo
