On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Stefan Fouant wrote:
Completely agree on the disturbing observation of the increase in
rate-limiting as a primary mitigation mechanism for dealing with DDoS. I've
seen more and more people using this as a mitigation strategy, against my
advice. For anyone interested in
Pekka Savola wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Stefan Fouant wrote:
Completely agree on the disturbing observation of the increase in
rate-limiting as a primary mitigation mechanism for dealing with
DDoS. I've
seen more and more people using this as a mitigation strategy, against my
advice. For
On Jan 21, 2010, at 4:34 AM, Pekka Savola wrote:
Thanks to Arbor for collecting the report and your observations.
One thing I found extremely strange is that almost 50% report they use
BCP38/Strict uRPF at peering edge, yet only about 33% use it in customer
direction. (Figure 13, p20)
On Jan 20, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
I'm wondering if you can clarify why 'Figure 1' only goes up to 2008 and
states in key findings This year, providers reported a peak rate of only 49
Gbps. I happen to personally recall looking at ATLAS sometime last year
and seeing an
On Jan 22, 2010, at 8:08 AM, Danny McPherson wrote:
Yep, I think this is simply an artifact of a larger respondent pool
size, with many smaller respondents being represented.
Correct, as noted in the text, the change in survey demographics appears to be
the cause of this shift.
[Apologies for any duplication if you've seen this notification on other lists.]
We've just posted the 2009 Worldwide Infrastructure Security Report for
download at this URL:
http://www.arbornetworks.com/report
This year's WWISR is based upon the broadest set of survey data collected by
-Original Message-
From: Dobbins, Roland [mailto:rdobb...@arbor.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:17 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: 2009 Worldwide Infrastructure Security Report available for
download.
[Apologies for any duplication if you've seen this notification on
other
7 matches
Mail list logo
