Doing a looking glass from the locally connected BGP peer for AS 16843,
they are receiving it, the top path, but showing it received-only, and
they want to use the prepended Path. The rest of L3, outside the local
peer looking glass, i.e. the rest of the planet does not even show this
path ?
I have a prefix that is having an issue with BGP, its all inside of
L3If there is someone that would be willing to assist with L3,
shoot me a e-mail offlist J
Dennis Burgess,
were very odd, all not
reaching their destination and some hopping all over creation before
dying. But if I did traceroute with ICMP it worked fine. Does this
indicate our upstream (Bantel.net) had a BGP issue? Bantel blamed
Hughesnet which is the service they resell. I'm wondering what
fine. I started doing traceroutes and they all were very odd, all not
reaching their destination and some hopping all over creation before
dying. But if I did traceroute with ICMP it worked fine. Does this
indicate our upstream (Bantel.net) had a BGP issue? Bantel blamed
Hughesnet which
hopping all over creation before dying. But if I did traceroute
with ICMP it worked fine. Does this indicate our upstream (Bantel.net) had a
BGP issue? Bantel blamed Hughesnet which is the service they resell. I'm
wondering what kind of problem would let ping work fine but not any of the
other
not reaching
their destination and some hopping all over creation before dying. But if I
did traceroute with ICMP it worked fine. Does this indicate our upstream
(Bantel.net) had a BGP issue? Bantel blamed Hughesnet which is the service
they resell. I'm wondering what kind of problem would
) had a BGP issue? Bantel blamed
Hughesnet which is the service they resell. I'm wondering what kind of problem
would let ping work fine but not any of the other protocols. It also seems odd
that I could traceroute via UDP part way to a destination but then it would
fail if the problem was my
traceroute with
ICMP it worked fine. Does this indicate our upstream (Bantel.net) had a BGP
issue? Bantel blamed Hughesnet which is the service they resell. I'm
wondering what kind of problem would let ping work fine but not any of the
other protocols. It also seems odd that I could traceroute via
over creation before
dying. But if I did traceroute with ICMP it worked fine. Does this
indicate our upstream (Bantel.net) had a BGP issue? Bantel blamed
Hughesnet which is the service they resell. I'm wondering what kind of
problem would let ping work fine but not any of the other protocols
Not quite sure what the issue is, but I suspect Comcast announcements
are not quite right?
Trying to get from Verizon Business to a Comcast address in NH (on
75.15.64.0/18), and it's going through San Jose.
Anyone else having similar issues or suggestions? Opened a ticket with
Comcast, but they
Sorry, my typo. The Net is 75.150.64.0/18
-Original Message-
From: Wallace Keith
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 12:20 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Comcast BGP issue?
Not quite sure what the issue is, but I suspect Comcast announcements
are not quite right?
Trying to get from
Can someone from Cogent responsible for security contact me? I'm seeing
some troubles that appear to originate within Cogent itself.
What I am seeing does not effect global BGP at all, it's some other
area. Thanks in advance ...
Can someone from ATT with BGP configuration access please contact me
off list, the provisioning group has been having trouble turnup our
BGP session on our 2xOC3 to AS7018 since 12AM and now its 4:30AM.
Erik
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo
