On 18 Aug 2015, at 20:48, J. Oquendo wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, Blake Dunlap wrote:
>
>> Since no one else has mentioned it, I'll dive on that fire.
>>
>> Be careful when setting up a multi-tenant security solution that you
>> are not accidentally selling "DoS as a Service" to your clients.
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, Blake Dunlap wrote:
> Since no one else has mentioned it, I'll dive on that fire.
>
> Be careful when setting up a multi-tenant security solution that you
> are not accidentally selling "DoS as a Service" to your clients. State
> is evil, and state sharing with other targets
Since no one else has mentioned it, I'll dive on that fire.
Be careful when setting up a multi-tenant security solution that you
are not accidentally selling "DoS as a Service" to your clients. State
is evil, and state sharing with other targets is dangerous. Target
sharing with other targets that
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Ramy Hashish
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We are planning to implement a multi-tenant FW/UTM and start providing
> security as a service, I would like to hear if anybody had experience on
> this, and if there are any recommendations for the UTM's vendor.
>
Check Point
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:27 AM, alvin nanog
wrote:
>
> hi
>
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Ramy Hashish
>> wrote:
>>
>> We are planning to implement a multi-tenant FW/UTM and start providing
>> security as a service, I would like to hear if anybody had experience on
>
> that'd be a good th
of course checkpoint.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Rakesh M wrote:
> Have a look below Ramy pdf
>
> https://www.sophos.com/en-us/medialibrary/PDFs/partners/sophos_complete_security_msps_dsna.pdf?la=en
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Ramy Hashish
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Rakesh and C
Have a look below Ramy pdf
https://www.sophos.com/en-us/medialibrary/PDFs/partners/sophos_complete_security_msps_dsna.pdf?la=en
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Ramy Hashish
wrote:
> Thank you Rakesh and Colin.
>
> I just want to amend something, "FW as a service" rather than "security as
>
one vm per sophos utm per customer
works well even with low ram as well
Colin
> On 17 Aug 2015, at 08:14, Andrew Jones wrote:
>
> Is there a multi-tennant capable UTM from Sophos? Or are you using a vm
> instance per customer?
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> On 17.08.2015 16:47, Colin Johnston wrote:
Thank you Rakesh and Colin.
I just want to amend something, "FW as a service" rather than "security as
a service".
Are you sure sophos has such a solution?
Thanks,
Ramy
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Colin Johnston
wrote:
> sophos utm works great :)
>
> Colin
>
> > On 17 Aug 2015, at 05:56
hi
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Ramy Hashish
> wrote:
>
> We are planning to implement a multi-tenant FW/UTM and start providing
> security as a service, I would like to hear if anybody had experience on
that'd be a good thing ... but ...
> this, and if there are any recommendations f
Is there a multi-tennant capable UTM from Sophos? Or are you using a vm
instance per customer?
Thanks,
Andrew
On 17.08.2015 16:47, Colin Johnston wrote:
sophos utm works great :)
Colin
On 17 Aug 2015, at 05:56, Rakesh M wrote:
I have seen one of our customers using Sophos and they are
rel
sophos utm works great :)
Colin
> On 17 Aug 2015, at 05:56, Rakesh M wrote:
>
> I have seen one of our customers using Sophos and they are relatively happy
> about it. Not directly experienced though.
>
> Thanks
> Rakesh
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Ramy Hashish
> wrote:
>
>> Hello
I have seen one of our customers using Sophos and they are relatively happy
about it. Not directly experienced though.
Thanks
Rakesh
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Ramy Hashish
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We are planning to implement a multi-tenant FW/UTM and start providing
> security as a serv
Hello All,
We are planning to implement a multi-tenant FW/UTM and start providing
security as a service, I would like to hear if anybody had experience on
this, and if there are any recommendations for the UTM's vendor.
People/customers here are more familiar with the Fortigate, however, we
need
14 matches
Mail list logo
