ASR1002

Anyone have recommendations on solid IOS XE code for ASR 1002 that's just doing: - BGP - VRF's - Many sub-interfaces and ACL's It shipped with 02.04.02.122-33.XND2.bin Thanks, Kenny

Re: ASR1002

2.10 has been solid on all my clients thus far and supports your below mentioned requirements. Mark Jackson, CCIE #4736 Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse spelling errors On Jan 6, 2010, at 4:36 PM, Kenny Sallee wrote: > Anyone have recommendations on solid IOS XE code for ASR 1002 that's > ju

Re: ASR1002

I would run at least the 2.5 software (XNE). You don't mention if you have RP1 or RP2, if you're doing sw redundancy or hw redundancy or both, etc.. This will also have an impact. I've seen some 'odd' issues with BGP on the ASR1k, so you really do want to track the latest code. It's also recom

Re: ASR1002

ut for the features you've listed above, should be stable enough. After running it since it's release (2.3.2 previously) I've not seen a software crash on any of our ASR1Ks. I run a mix of RP1 and RP2 devices and since this an ASR1002 you'll be after the RP1 code. McDonald O

Re: ASR1002

I'm finding this to be a fascinating thread as I am currently in the process of evaluating some M7i's vs. some ASR1002's. Seems the Jun's have settled into a less reflexive release schedule then the ASRs currently. At some point I'm sure the ASR's release schedule

Re: ASR1002

December. > > 2.4.2 still has a few bugs but for the features you've listed above, should > be stable enough. After running it since it's release (2.3.2 previously) > I've not seen a software crash on any of our ASR1Ks. I run a mix of RP1 and > RP2 devices and since this

Re: ASR1002

HI， Who knows how to unsubscribe the mail list? Thanks a looot! 发件人： Kenny Sallee 发送时间： 2010-01-07 08:36:23 收件人： nanog 抄送： 主题： ASR1002 Anyone have recommendations on solid IOS XE code for ASR 1002 that's just doing: - BGP - VRF's - Many sub-interfaces and ACL&#x

Re: ASR1002

> Who knows how to unsubscribe the mail list? look at the headers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help:

Re: ASR1002

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 05:20:59PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > > Who knows how to unsubscribe the mail list? > > look at the headers i still read most of my mail with mutt, but in my experience, many "modern" interfaces (gmail/thunderrbird/etc) don't make it intuative to find and/or read the heade

Re: ASR1002

On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Jim Mercer wrote: i still read most of my mail with mutt, but in my experience, many "modern" interfaces (gmail/thunderrbird/etc) don't make it intuative to find and/or read the headers. In gmail you click "show details" and then there is a "unsubscribe from this mailing

Re: ASR1002

Inline (and diverse) replies, as it's more of a rant, but slightly relevant to the list ops if not the OP topic: 1 - On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 15:50 +0800, NetYourLife2007 wrote (well, at least his mailer declared itself to be...): > Mailer: > Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 22 [cn] Kenny's mail client may be

OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002

for days now, i've been trying to remember a quotation, which i vaguely seem to remember popping up in trn/nn or some USENET newsreader of old, along the lines of: "the telephone, once commonly available in cities, " or something like that. ring a bell for anyone? -- Jim Mercerj..

Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002

On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 11:00 -0500, Jim Mercer wrote: > for days now, i've been trying to remember a quotation, which i vaguely seem > to remember popping up in trn/nn or some USENET newsreader of old, along > the lines of: > > "the telephone, once commonly available in cities, " > > or someth

Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002

On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 17:42 -0800, Bill Stewart wrote: > Could the comment actually have been about pay telephones, which were > once common in cities? > Good point Bill, which, if so, would place the comment at or about the start of the cellfone introduction. @Jim, maybe it's more a telco/2600

Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 08:30:52AM +, gordon b slater wrote: > On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 17:42 -0800, Bill Stewart wrote: > > Could the comment actually have been about pay telephones, which were > > once common in cities? > > > > Good point Bill, which, if so, would place the comment at or about

Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002

On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 03:35 -0500, Jim Mercer wrote: > "The telephone, for those of you who have forgotten, was a commonly used > communications technology in the days before electronic mail. > They're still easy to find in most large cities." -- Nathaniel Borenstein Oh, the irony. A quote from M

Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002

> "The telephone, for those of you who have forgotten, was a commonly used > communications technology in the days before electronic mail. > They're still easy to find in most large cities." -- Nathaniel Borenstein > > i'm guessing this is before the mobile phone explosion. Good old one. It's fun

Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:01:50 CST, Jorge Amodio said: > Ohh yeah, now we can send sort of a telegram with multiple fonts and > colors almost from anywhere... At least it doesn't do BLINK ;) pgpAPxTQSvjnu.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002

Hello Valdis , On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:01:50 CST, Jorge Amodio said: Ohh yeah, now we can send sort of a telegram with multiple fonts and colors almost from anywhere... At least it doesn't do BLINK ;) Are we really sure of

Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:01:50 -0600 Jorge Amodio wrote: > > "The telephone, for those of you who have forgotten, was a commonly used > > communications technology in the days before electronic mail. > > They're still easy to find in most large cities." -- Nathaniel Borenstein > > > > i'm guessing

Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002

> It's funny how we circle around with technology, folks are dumping > their phone land lines and adopting wireless/mobile that required a > substantial technology leap and investment and now we are using the > mobile phone to "text" an incompressible dialect worse than the early > teletype/telex d

Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002

On 21/01/2010 07:25, Randy Bush wrote: >> It's funny how we circle around with technology, folks are dumping >> their phone land lines and adopting wireless/mobile that required a >> substantial technology leap and investment and now we are using the >> mobile phone to "text" an incompressible dial

Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002

gordon b slater wrote: On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 11:00 -0500, Jim Mercer wrote: for days now, i've been trying to remember a quotation, which i vaguely seem "the telephone, once commonly available in cities, " ring a bell for anyone? Maybe it was a Gopher thing? This newfangled Googly-thing f

Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:52 AM, wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:01:50 CST, Jorge Amodio said: >> Ohh yeah, now we can send sort of a telegram with multiple fonts and >> colors almost from anywhere... > At least it doesn't do BLINK ;) Oh SMS/MMS do a few things that make blink tags look utter

RE: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002

> James Hess [mailto:mysi...@gmail.com] > Saturday, April 17, 2010 4:27 PM > > Oh SMS/MMS do a few things that make blink tags look utterly > benign... > http://www.dreamfabric.com/sms/alert.html > > May be possible to send as a flash message that immediately displays > blinking, and that dep