Re: AW: AW: AW: /27 the new /24

2015-10-09 Thread Mike Hammett
://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: "Jérôme Nicolle" To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 7:10:31 AM Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: /27 the new /24 Hello James, Le 05/10/2015 06:45, James Jun a écrit :

Re: AW: AW: AW: /27 the new /24

2015-10-09 Thread Jérôme Nicolle
Hello James, Le 05/10/2015 06:45, James Jun a écrit : > I'm not aware of any carrier-grade network that operates on these things. With the availability of a 80Gbps model and upcoming updates to the routing process (in RouterOS 7), chances are these boxes will drag much more attention in the next

Re: AW: AW: AW: /27 the new /24

2015-10-04 Thread James Jun
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 08:10:36AM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote: > > People keep thinking I want Level 3 to replace a loaded 6500 with a CCR and > that's simply not what I'm saying at all. The point of rattling off the > newer\smaller hardware was to say that if the site doesn't require 40G\100G,

Re: AW: AW: AW: /27 the new /24

2015-10-03 Thread Mike Hammett
-ix.com - Original Message - From: "Jürgen Jaritsch" To: "Mike Hammett" Cc: "NANOG" Sent: Saturday, October 3, 2015 6:06:59 AM Subject: AW: AW: AW: /27 the new /24 Hi Mike, > but the boxes that have been there for 10 years have more than paid for

AW: AW: AW: /27 the new /24

2015-10-03 Thread Jürgen Jaritsch
Hi Mike, > but the boxes that have been there for 10 years have more than paid for > themselves (unless they're a shitty business). No question about that! But why should they throw them away if they can still print $$$ with these boxes? They have to change nothing till the global routing tabl