Mark Andrews writes:
> The [func] below are bug fixes / security fixes.
Umh, using a very relaxed definition maybe...
I was very happy to see this feature added in 9.9.8, and I can certainly
agree that it is security related. But I hardly think it is suitable
for the strict "no new features" p
On 11/16/15 4:55 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> This action by red hat is nice from a stability perspective but
> infuriates many standards derived folks like ISC/BIND and NTP amongst
> others as a version number means something to them.
>
> This dialogue is typically broken from both sides as expecta
This action by red hat is nice from a stability perspective but infuriates many
standards derived folks like ISC/BIND and NTP amongst others as a version
number means something to them.
This dialogue is typically broken from both sides as expectations are different
and bug reports get lost bet
In message , Alan Buxey
writes:
> >
> No. CentOS follows RedHat. They backport fixes to older versions rather
> than put the new version out. It appears that have aversion to new
> feature and just want to put the fixes onto the older versions. So that
> 9.9.4 probably has 60% of the changes
No. CentOS follows RedHat. They backport fixes to older versions rather than
put the new version out. It appears that have aversion to new feature and just
want to put the fixes onto the older versions. So that 9.9.4 probably has 60%
of the changes that the diff of 9.9.4 has to 9.9.8 . This
In message <20151116161939.ga3...@lboro.ac.uk>, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk writes:
> Hi,
>
> > Just a heads up, even the latest CentOS 7 package has the wrong IPv4 and v6
> > address.
>
> whilst the new H-ROOT is alive now, the official switch-over date is 1st
> December 2015
> and the old address
Hi,
> Just a heads up, even the latest CentOS 7 package has the wrong IPv4 and v6
> address.
whilst the new H-ROOT is alive now, the official switch-over date is 1st
December 2015
and the old address will be available for 6 months after thatso if any BIND
package
comes out AFTER 1st Decembe
12:39 PM
> > To: nanog@nanog.org
> > Subject: Advance notice - H-root address change on December 1, 2015
> >
> >
> > This is advance notice that there is a scheduled change to the IP
> addresses
> > for one of the authorities listed for the DNS root zone and the .A
Friendly reminder...
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Kash, Howard M
CIV USARMY RDECOM
> ARL (US)
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 12:39 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Advance notice - H-root address change o
This is advance notice that there is a scheduled change to the IP addresses
for one of the authorities listed for the DNS root zone and the .ARPA TLD.
The change is to H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET, which is administered by the U.S. Army
Research Laboratory.
The new IPv4 address for this authority is 198.9
10 matches
Mail list logo
