rrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Luke Guillory therefore does
> not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
> message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. .
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Beh
y errors or omissions in the contents of this
> message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. .
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Keenan Singh
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:09 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
>
Keenan
> On 11 Jan 2017, at 15:10, Luke Guillory wrote:
>
> Netflix won’t even begin talks for their cache if you're not doing a minimum
> of 5Gbps.
Outside of the US I believe it is less based on presentations I have seen in
Africa.
> They also require massive uploads to the cache often, th
gt; and
>>> less effective. We are currently looking at any way we can save on
>>> Bandwidth or to be more Efficient with the Bandwidth we currently have.
>> We
>>> do have a Layer 2 Circuit between the Island and Miami, I am seeing there
>>> are WAN Acce
only option?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Kuhnke"
To: "nanog@nanog.org list"
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 3:23:58 PM
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Savings
The challenge
Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Hicks"
To: "Keenan Singh"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 2:55:05 PM
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Savings
I don't know the the Car
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:08:45PM -0500, Keenan Singh wrote:
> We are currently looking at any way we can save on
> Bandwidth or to be more Efficient with the Bandwidth we currently have.
Measure what you're doing in as much detail as you can. Slice-and-dice
it by source, destination, time-of-da
The problem with the local cache[s] is the bandwidth cost of populating the
cache and keeping it coherent can be greater than the bandwidth saved. From
your description, I would expect this to be the case so a local cache will
not help. Rule of thumb is if your downstream traffic is not at least
3g
of Compress and decompress the Traffic before it goes over the Layer 2, I
> have never used this before, has any one here used anything like this, what
> results would I be able to expect for ISP Traffic?
>
> If not any ideas on Bandwidth Savings, or being more Efficient with want
>> with most services now moving to HTTPS the cache is proving to be less
> >> and
> >>> less effective. We are currently looking at any way we can save on
> >>> Bandwidth or to be more Efficient with the Bandwidth we currently have.
> >> We
&
sort
>>> of Compress and decompress the Traffic before it goes over the Layer 2, I
>>> have never used this before, has any one here used anything like this,
>> what
>>> results would I be able to expect for ISP Traffic?
>>>
>>> If not any ideas on Bandwidth Savings, or being more Efficient with want
>> we
>>> currently.
>>>
>>> Many thanks for any Help
>>>
>>> Keenan
>>>
>>
ors where they would put a Server on either end and sort
> > of Compress and decompress the Traffic before it goes over the Layer 2, I
> > have never used this before, has any one here used anything like this,
> what
> > results would I be able to expect for ISP Traffic?
>
> have never used this before, has any one here used anything like this, what
> results would I be able to expect for ISP Traffic?
>
> If not any ideas on Bandwidth Savings, or being more Efficient with want we
> currently.
>
> Many thanks for any Help
>
> Keenan
>
ubject: Re: Bandwidth Savings
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 23:08:45 -0500, Keenan Singh said:
> do have a Layer 2 Circuit between the Island and Miami, I am seeing
> there are WAN Accelerators where they would put a Server on either end
> and sort of Compress and decompress the Traffic before it goes
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 23:08:45 -0500, Keenan Singh said:
> do have a Layer 2 Circuit between the Island and Miami, I am seeing there
> are WAN Accelerators where they would put a Server on either end and sort
> of Compress and decompress the Traffic before it goes over the Layer 2, I
> have never us
sult of
e-mail transmission. .
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Keenan Singh
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:09 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Bandwidth Savings
Hi Guys
We are an ISP in the Caribbean, and are faced with extremely high B
thing like this, what
> results would I be able to expect for ISP Traffic?
>
> If not any ideas on Bandwidth Savings, or being more Efficient with want we
> currently.
>
> Many thanks for any Help
>
> Keenan
have never used this before, has any one here used anything like this, what
results would I be able to expect for ISP Traffic?
If not any ideas on Bandwidth Savings, or being more Efficient with want we
currently.
Many thanks for any Help
Keenan
18 matches
Mail list logo
