On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:14:43 +0200, Jeroen Massar said:
> On 2011-Jun-01 18:36, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> > On the other hand, if you have a firewall you need to disable in order
> > for it to get valid IPv6 results, you don't actually have a working IPv6
> > configuration, do you?
>
> The
On 2011-Jun-01 18:36, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:54:28 EDT, Atticus said:
>> Disable the firewall and try again or all results are worthless.
That is quite what I noted, the thing is that apparently the delay for
clicking 'ok' is taken into account for the measurements
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:54:28 EDT, Atticus said:
> Disable the firewall and try again or all results are worthless.
On the other hand, if you have a firewall you need to disable in order
for it to get valid IPv6 results, you don't actually have a working IPv6
configuration, do you?
pgpvDOdEnbuYr
Disable the firewall and try again or all results are worthless.
On 2011-Jun-01 13:18, Tim Chown wrote:
>
> On 31 May 2011, at 22:31, Voll, Toivo wrote:
>
>>
>> Netalyzr (http://n3.netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/analysis) finds no
>> issues with my IPv6 status, but alerts me to the fact (since
>> confirmed by switching to IE) that Google Chrome defaults to IPv4
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
