On Saturday, July 9, 2016, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Jimmy Hess > wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:04 PM, >
> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > Blockchain-based replacement for RPKI involving encoding of
> > IP address registry registrations assigned to a Networ
How'd namecoin work out? .bit taking over the internet?
/kc
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 05:39:17PM -0400, Christopher Morrow said:
>On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:04 PM, wrote:
>> > Hi,
>>
>> Blockchain-based replacement for RPKI involvi
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:04 PM, wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Blockchain-based replacement for RPKI involving encoding of
> IP address registry registrations assigned to a Network operator's
> specified Org ID wallet, And LOAs for propagating the an
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:04 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
Blockchain-based replacement for RPKI involving encoding of
IP address registry registrations assigned to a Network operator's
specified Org ID wallet, And LOAs for propagating the announcement
of a prefix by using Colored coins automatically
Hi,
> This is pretty O/T for this list, isn't it?
not if he's using his routers ASICs to do it! ;-)
(or maybe its related to the bitcoin network traffic volumes...but
thats too logical...)
alan
This is pretty O/T for this list, isn't it?
On Jul 9, 2016 12:15 PM, "John Levine" wrote:
> At about 16:46 UTC block 420001 showed up on the Bitcoin blockchain,
> so the mining reward per block dropped from 25 to 12.5 btc.
>
> Depending on whom you believe, nothing will change, or most of the
> m
At about 16:46 UTC block 420001 showed up on the Bitcoin blockchain,
so the mining reward per block dropped from 25 to 12.5 btc.
Depending on whom you believe, nothing will change, or most of the
miners will go offline, or something else. My blockchain client saw
420002 was over 25 minutes after
7 matches
Mail list logo
