@nanog.org] On
Behalf Of Masataka Ohta
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2022 3:56 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: CGNAT scaling cost (was Re: V6 still not supported)
Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG wrote:
> CGNAT cost was very close to 3x compared to routers of the same
> performance.
That sho
Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG wrote:
CGNAT cost was very close to 3x compared to routers of the
same performance.
That should be because you are comparing cost of carrier,
that is telco, grade NAT and consumer grade routers.
Remember the cost of carrier grade datalink of SONET/SDH.
n
the cost.
Eduard
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+vasilenko.eduard=huawei@nanog.org] On
Behalf Of Jared Brown
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2022 6:33 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: CGNAT scaling cost (was Re: V6 still not supported)
An oft-cited driver of IPv6 adoption is
An oft-cited driver of IPv6 adoption is the cost of scaling CGNAT or equivalent
infrastructure for IPv4.
Those of you facing costs for scaling CGNAT, are your per unit costs rising or
declining faster or slower than your IPv4 traffic growth?
I ask because I realize I am not fit to evaluate the
4 matches
Mail list logo
